FreedomFirst,
Thanks for your comments. I've read more since reading the dismissal, including Leo's post, Phil's post on the RightSideOfLife, and your posts, and have decided to simmer down and not continue to over-react. I think I was emotionally too involved with the Orly, Kreep, and Carter drama, and ignored my own counsel of reason, logic, and common sense.
At any rate, it would seem that the quo warranto action still leads the path to glory. Leo's comments include:
[ed. you appear to be too emotionally involved to see the plain legal truth. So calm down and hear me out - the federal quo warranto statute in section 3502 requires that any "third person" go to the DOJ to request the AG bring a quo warranto. Orly did that and no such quo warranto was brought. Hence, her request was refused.
She was then entitled to proceed to section 3503 of the quo warranto statute and approach the court by verified (sworn under oath) petition requesting leave to issue a writ of quo warranto to the President on behalf of her clients. Such a complaint however cannot be based upon unproved allegations, but rather each fact complained of must be sworn to under oath. Under 3503, an "interested person" does not need the permission of the DOJ and such a person can go straight to the DC District Court.
3503 WAS NOT USED. IT WAS IGNORED.
There's no reason why it can't be used right now. Got it?]
BTW, Leo's comments were not directed to me.
