Thread: Ron Paul on the Issues

The current view of the 2012 presidential election, based on HuffPost Pollster charts and analysis.

Updated Thursday, Oct. 11 6:16 pm ET
Obama 275 Electoral Votes <---- Ooooh Poop
Romney 206 Electoral Votes <---- Ooooh Poop

270 electoral votes needed to win

Obama vs. Romney Electoral Map

Obama vs Romney

Last Updated: 10/11

State	Pollster	Poll Date	Obama	Romney
Ohio	Rasmussen Reports	10/10-10/10	48%	47%
National	Monmouth/SurveyUSA/Braun	10/8-10/10	46%	47%
National	Rasmussen Tracking	10/8-10/10	48%	47%
Nevada	PPP	10/8-10/10	51%	47%
Montana	PPP	10/8-10/10	41%	52%
Ohio	Gravis Marketing	10/6-10/10	45%	46%
National	Gallup Tracking	10/4-10/10	47%	48%
North Carolina	Rasmussen Reports	10/9-10/9	48%	51%
Wisconsin	CBS/NYT/Quinnipiac	10/9-10/9	50%	47%
New Hampshire	Rasmussen Reports	10/9-10/9	48%	48%
Wisconsin	Rasmussen Reports	10/9-10/9	51%	49%
Pennsylvania	Rasmussen Reports	10/9-10/9	51%	46%
Ohio	NBC/WSJ/Marist	10/7-10/9	51%	45%
Florida	NBC/WSJ/Marist	10/7-10/9	48%	47%
Virginia	NBC/WSJ/Marist	10/7-10/9	47%	48%

More Obama vs Romney »

Rasmussen Tracking »

Gallup Tracking »


Battleground States: Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania.

General Election? Read the Karl Rove Playbook

Presidential Polls for 2012 Election - Latest Political National Polls

Ron Paul Refuses to Endorse Romney



Similar/Related Articles

1. Ron Paul: “I Don’t Fully Endorse Romney For President”
2. Lew Rockwell: Ron Paul will NOT Endorse Mitt Romney
3. Huntsman to drop out, endorse Romney
4. Tom Woods: Ron, Don’t Endorse Mitt Romney
5. Ron Paul “I Run Against All 3 Because They Are Very Similar… They All Endorse Preemptive War”
6. Ron Paul Refuses to Concede Maine: Official
7. “VP” Rand Paul and the Imaginary Romney/Paul Connection
8. Ron Paul: No Coordination With Romney
9. Santorum, Romney in virtual tie, with Ron Paul in third
10. Romney Slate Blown Over by Ron Paul in Massachusetts
11. As Santorum and Romney battle, Paul slams both as liberal
12. It’s Romney vs. Ron Paul in Maine Caucuses

Rand Paul Slams Romney Foreign Policy

October 11, 2012 by Sam Rolley

UPI

Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) criticized Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney on foreign policy in a column Wednesday published by CNN.

Romney, who got the Senator’s endorsement to the dismay of Ron Paul supporters earlier in the campaign, has been heavily critical of President Barack Obama’s foreign policy in recent weeks and has called for increased defense spending and more Mideast intervention. But the younger Paul says he cannot support Romney in certain areas of foreign policy.

Here’s an excerpt from the column:

Romney chose to criticize President Obama for seeking to cut a bloated Defense Department and for not being bellicose enough in the Middle East, two assertions with which I cannot agree.

Defense and war spending has grown 137% since 2001. That kind of growth is not sustainable.

Adm. Michael Mullen stated earlier this year that the biggest threat to our national security is our debt.

If debt is our gravest threat, adding to the debt by expanding military spending further threatens our national security.

While I would always stand up for America and preserve our ability to defend ourselves, a less aggressive foreign policy along with an audit of the Pentagon could save tens of billions of dollars each year without sacrificing our defense. To dismiss either idea is to miss the very compromise that will enable us to balance our budget. That compromise would be for conservatives to admit that not every dollar spent on the military is sacred or well-spent and for liberals to admit that not every dollar spent on domestic entitlements and welfare is necessary.

In North Africa and the Middle East, our problem has not been a lack of intervention. In the past 10 years we have fought two full wars there, and bombed or sent troops into several others.

Rand Paul Slams Romney Foreign Policy : Personal Liberty Digest™

Pat Buchanan and (Gasp) Laura Ingraham knock Romney's neocon foreign policy

Pat Buchanan warns ‘the neocons are pushing’ Romney toward the ‘freedom agenda’

Daily Caller: On Monday, Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney offered his foreign policy vision in a speech at the Virginia Military Institute. But that speech, according to conservative commentator Pat Buchanan, was a little too close to the “neocon” agenda for comfort.

In an appearance on Laura Ingraham’s radio show on Tuesday, Buchanan, the author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?,” said Romney ought to distance himself from former President George W. Bush’s hawkish record on foreign policy, which came to define neoconservative ideology.

Video: Pat Buchanan warns ‘the neocons are pushing’ Romney toward the ‘freedom agenda’ | The Daily Caller


Article continues: Pat Buchanan warns ‘the neocons are pushing’ Romney toward the ‘freedom agenda’ | The Daily Caller

GOP now ironically begging Ron Paul supporters for help

Elections 2012
October 9, 2012
By: Jeffrey Phelps

It wasn't long ago that the GOP establishment and the mainstream media hated Ron Paul, his supporters and everything they stand for...original conservative American values. Why then is VP candidate Paul Ryan and the GOP now begging for their support? Credits: Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

The Houston Chronicle posted their weekly report on Saturday detailing their top 10 most popular articles of the week. Third most popular was an article describing GOP Vice Presidential candidate Paul Ryan's plea to Ron Paul supporters, begging for their support, just weeks after the GOP and the media egregiously shunned Paul supporters at the national convention and throughout the entire 2012 nomination process.

Potentially hoping the vast majority of Ron Paul's supporters have already forgotten how badly they were treated during the election season, by the GOP establishment, in almost every state that Paul's supporters had an opportunity to participate, all of the sudden it seems as though Paul's supporters are important enough to the Republicans that they feel it necessary to now start begging for support.



Mere weeks ago the long-standing attitude by both the establishment and its media was that Ron Paul and his supporters were nothing but a nuisance, wanting nothing to do with anything associated with Ron Paul. They wouldn't let him speak at the national convention, even though he was one of the only two candidates left standing and he was literally forced to walk the convention floor for support like a petty, third-rate peasant. The convention staff did everything in their power to discredit and literally, illegally disqualify duly and legally elected Ron Paul delegates from participating in the process and coercively manipulated the proceedings so Paul delegates couldn't have any meaningful effect on the outcome, of any aspect, of the convention. Yet, now the Republicans, or at least Paul Ryan, realizes they may not have a chance to win without them.

Since prior to January's Iowa caucus the Republican establishment and its media, on both sides of the aisle, have been acting as if Ron Paul supporters were kooks, nut jobs and conspiracy theorists. Throughout the entire process Paul supporters have had to endure some of the most outrageous claims and character assassinations politics has ever seen. Since the Tea Party movement was adopted by Ron Paul and his supporters in 2007, prior to it being co-opted by the Republican establishment, the world has seen some of the most sadistic and horrific rhetoric and actions ever established to prevent a legitimate candidate from having a fair chance and opportunity in a political process.

Almost every single state that allowed for individuals to participate in a delegate selection process, after that state's initial straw poll (caucus) concluded, so-called GOP “officials” participated in unimaginable rules violations and practices to prevent Ron Paul and his supporters from gaining any momentum or having any success, without any demand for accountability by anyone in the GOP establishment or the mainstream media. Even going to such extremes as submitting fake slates of delegates to the convention floor, subverting or breaking many other rules if Paul's supporters were winning convention battles, physically assaulting supporters, kicking them out of local, regional or state conventions or were even having them arrested to prevent participation. Had the media been honest about the process, been honest about who was winning the polls prior to the beginning of the election season and demanded fairness and integrity throughout the process, it is very likely Ron Paul and his truly educated and conservative values, policies and ideologies would have won out with the conservative American constituency.

Forthcoming journalists like Ben Swann of WXIX Cincinnati and the Conspiracy Examiner, via Examiner.com, carefully and thoroughly documented almost every step of the 2012 GOP nomination process and clearly spelled out an obvious agenda, doing everything it took, both physically and psychologically, to steal the nomination for a pro-establishment candidate, like Mitt Romney, to secure a “choice” for the American people that would not deviate too far from the current direction the establishment, on either side of the aisle, has been speeding toward for decades. All while thoroughly demonizing Ron Paul and his supporters in the media as the antithesis of anything America needs, during the entire process.

To the vast majority of Ron Paul supporters and any other American voter that has done research independent from sources suggested by the typical mainstream talking head, Romney represents almost none of the ideals and policies they would expect to see from a president, especially one claiming to be a conservative. Even Republican establishment gatekeeper Rush Limbaugh has thoroughly detailed the fact that Romney resembles nothing like the typical conservative. That being said, other than very little of the recent rhetoric adopted since Romney began running for president in 2007, his political history, voting record and historical commentary is actually closer to Obama's than any other candidate presented to the American people since Obama himself ran for office four years ago. It's actually quite stunning to see the American people buy into the establishment media's rhetoric about any differences Obama and Romney may have considering just how similar both candidates are.

Both candidates have maintained a belief in socialized medicine, the bailout (TARP) of so-called “too big to fail” global banking cartels (the same institutions that have generally funded both campaigns with massive contributions...Romney's campaign funding vs. Obama's), the continued militarization of the Middle East and North Africa (PNAC) for the continued domination of energy resources in the region and the continued degradation of the Muslim culture, the ultimate invasion of Iran while pushing Israeli-style Iranian nuclear weapons propaganda, the Patriot Act, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that includes the unconstitutional indefinite detention of American citizens, the continued trust in a private Federal Reserve system that has overseen a 98% decrease in the value of the US dollar since its inception in 1913 and any other extremely important policy that isn't discussed in an open forum like presidential debates or on the local or national news.

The vast majority of Ron Paul supporters are fully aware of these circumstances… The very reason they became Ron Paul supporters to begin with. Very few are shaken in any meaningful way by the new GOP request to “fall in line” with the Republican establishment for fear of Romney losing to Obama if they don't add their support to the Republican base. Ron Paul supporters realize there truly is very little difference between Obama and Romney, especially when it comes to the policies that truly matter to the American people. Ron Paul supporters are more concerned about the continued loss of their rights and freedoms and understand that, even if Romney were to win, no significant changes are going to occur.

The common talking points Obama and Romney argue about publicly, Obama-care, abortion, and the way they argue about jobs and the economy are laughable and neither has ever offered any significant ideas of value that would indicate a change from a direction that has seen the epic declines in American education, the value of the US dollar, American living standards, industrialization and the shipping of jobs overseas by both candidates, the quality of food and so many other important aspects that affect the lives of the American people.

Americans have instead witnessed decades of growing obesity rates and the declining overall health of the American people, skyrocketing health care costs, skyrocketing fuel prices, skyrocketing debt that recently surpassed $16 trillion and is well on its way to $17 trillion and climbing, the loss of age-old civil liberties, an ever-growing police state and so many other aspects of an American lifestyle that now seems to be nothing more than a distant memory. Ask either of the two remaining candidates and they will even tell you they are both open gun control advocates and will both likely continue supporting the UN in pushing for the further reduction of gun rights in America, via policies like the UN small arms Treaty, as well.

Absolutely nothing about a neocon like Mitt Romney entices Ron Paul supporters into throwing their support into his corner and by Paul Ryan now openly begging for their support, even after how poorly they've been treated over the past five years by both the GOP and the establishment's mainstream local and national media, it's not only embarrassing that they'd even bring themselves to ask, it also gives credence to just how desperate the Romney campaign and the GOP is for support.

Maybe the GOP establishment and those in the mainstream media that still actually believe Romney represents any real change from the status quo or the current path America has been on for the past few decades should've thought about how important Ron Paul's supporters were to their success, prior to treating them like they were the black plague over the past five years... Not that Libertarian and conservative minded patriots like Ron Paul supporters would have ever backed a quasi-liberal neocon like Romney in the first place. Not even for his quasi-neocon running mate, Paul Ryan.

Subscribe to: Receive automatic updates from the Policy & Issues Examiner!

Visit these related pages:
Examiner Profile
Official Facebook page
Secondary Facebook page
Official Twitter
Alternative Twitter
Alternative website
Official Youtube channel
Klout profile

Suggested by the author:

• Feinberg heads another inside job victim's compensation mediation
• 'The Great Culling' water fluoridation documentary set for Denver premiere
• Ventura announces possible 2016 Presidential run
• Aurora theater shooting court documents blows inside job conspiracy wide open
• How the GOP stole the nomination

GOP now ironically begging Ron Paul supporters for help - National Policy & Issues | Examiner.com

Head Of Security At U.S. Embassy in Yemen Assassinated

Submitted by GBAmerica on Thu, 10/11/2012 - 22:26
Video, TV & Movies

BREAKING! Head Of Security At U.S. Embassy in Yemen Assassinated



BREAKING! Head Of Security At U.S. Embassy in Yemen Assassinated - YouTube

! Head Of Security At U.S. Embassy in Yemen Assassinated | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Revolution

Lindsey Graham Introduces Bill To Commit US Troops to Israel

Submitted by ttj1776 on Thu, 10/11/2012 - 20:44
Daily Paul Liberty Forum

New Senate Push to Pledge Unconditional Support for Israeli Preventive War on Iran

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is planning to press the Senate next month to pledge U.S. troops, money, and political support to Israel should Bibi Netanyahu launch a preventive war on Iran.

Graham claims his effort would merely make explicit that the U.S. has Israel's back. But when your friend is drunk, you don't hand them the keys. If Graham has his way, he will hand Bibi the keys and lend him our car, while the rest of us ride shotgun.

Graham's planned measure would outsource the decision about whether the U.S. goes to war to the Israeli prime minister, pledging that if Bibi decides to act -- regardless of the consequences and our own calculations -- the U.S. will provide money, troops, and political leverage (presumably at the UN and IAEA where there will be a push to shred the sanctions and the Non-Proliferation Treaty).

Those who support the measure will likely claim that a "credible threat" of war must be issued in order to prevent an actual war. But U.S. military leaders understand the difference between a credible threat, which is already very much on the table given the U.S. presence in the Persian Gulf, and outsourcing the decision of whether the U.S. goes to war to Bibi Netanyahu.

More: http://www.huffingtonpost...

Lindsey Graham Introduces Bill To Commit US Troops to Israel | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Revolution

Ron Paul: I'm Trying to Prevent The Collapse of the Dollar

First Re-Election Coming for NDAA Traitors in Congress: How Did Yours Vote?

Submitted by Sue4theBillofrights on Thu, 10/11/2012 - 22:31
Daily Paul Liberty Forum

First Re-Election Coming for NDAA Traitors in Congress: How Did Yours Vote? - Bodybuilding.com Forums
This will be the first time the all representatives who voted for the NDAA 's indefinite military detention of US citizens provisions are up for re-election since the deed. The National Defense
Authorization Act was passed despite enormous outcry.

If your congressman is one of them and unopposed, you can either come up with a write-in candidate in your district or "blank" him. A blank vote is an empty checkbox when you get down to this spot on the ballot. If a district has a high turn-out for the presidential election, but say 70% blanks for an unopposed congressman, it is likely that in the next election that congressman will be in for a serious challenge.

If you don't know who your representative is you can find him here by zip code.

One very powerful thing you can do is get a letter published in your local newspaper about your congressman's vote. You crib this:

Editor,

As we enter the election I would like to remind people that this is the first time our US representatives who passed the NDAA's provisions for the indefinite military detention of US citizens, without charge or trial, have stood for re-election since the law was passed. Congressman Jergoff is one of them.

This is distinctly un-American legislation which goes contrary to our Bill Of Rights. Let this be one of our considerations a the ballot box this November.

Tool for quickly looking up your local newspapers letter-to-editor email:

http://www.winningprogressive.org/le...ditor-campaign

For senators it's simple. If your senator is not one of the following 13, the bastard voted for it:

Cardin (D-MD),
Coburn (R-OK),
Crapo (R-ID),
DeMint (R-SC),
Durbin (D-IL),
Franken (D-MN),
Harkin (D-IA),
Lee (R-UT),
Merkley (D-OR),
Paul (R-KY),
Risch (R-ID),
Sanders (I-VT),
Wyden (D-OR)

In the House the vote was as follows. An "Aye" vote means he approved of NDAA.

H.R. 1540: National Defense Authorization Act for ... (On the Conference Report) -- GovTrack.us

Vote Party Representative District

Alaska

Aye R Young, Donald “Don” AK

Alabama

Aye R Bonner, Jo AL 1st

Aye R Roby, Martha AL 2nd

Aye R Rogers, Michael “Mike” AL 3rd

Aye R Aderholt, Robert AL 4th

Aye R Brooks, Mo AL 5th

Aye R Bachus, Spencer AL 6th

Aye D Sewell, Terri AL 7th



Arkansas

Aye R Crawford, Rick AR 1st

Aye R Griffin, Tim AR 2nd

Aye R Womack, Steve AR 3rd

Aye D Ross, Mike AR 4th



Arizona

No R Gosar, Paul AZ 1st

Aye R Franks, Trent AZ 2nd

Aye R Quayle, Ben AZ 3rd

Aye D Pastor, Edward “Ed” AZ 4th

No R Schweikert, David AZ 5th

No R Flake, Jeff AZ 6th

No D Grijalva, Raul AZ 7th

No Vote D Giffords, Gabrielle AZ 8th



California

No D Thompson, Michael “Mike” CA 1st

Aye R Herger, Walter “Wally” CA 2nd

Aye R Lungren, Daniel CA 3rd

No R McClintock, Tom CA 4th

No D Matsui, Doris CA 5th

No D Woolsey, Lynn CA 6th

No D Miller, George CA 7th

Aye D Pelosi, Nancy CA 8th

No D Lee, Barbara CA 9th

Aye D Garamendi, John CA 10th

Aye D McNerney, Jerry CA 11th

No D Speier, Jackie CA 12th

No D Stark, Fortney “Pete” CA 13th

No D Eshoo, Anna CA 14th

No D Honda, Michael “Mike” CA 15th

No D Lofgren, Zoe CA 16th

No D Farr, Sam CA 17th

Aye D Cardoza, Dennis CA 18th

Aye R Denham, Jeff CA 19th

Aye D Costa, Jim CA 20th

Aye R Nunes, Devin CA 21st

Aye R McCarthy, Kevin CA 22nd

Aye D Capps, Lois CA 23rd

Aye R Gallegly, Elton CA 24th

Aye R McKeon, Howard “Buck” CA 25th

Aye R Dreier, David CA 26th

Aye D Sherman, Brad CA 27th

Aye D Berman, Howard CA 28th

Aye D Schiff, Adam CA 29th

Aye D Waxman, Henry CA 30th

No D Becerra, Xavier CA 31st

No D Chu, Judy CA 32nd

No D Bass, Karen CA 33rd

No D Roybal-Allard, Lucille CA 34th

No D Waters, Maxine CA 35th

No D Hahn, Janice CA 36th

Aye D Richardson, Laura CA 37th

No D Napolitano, Grace CA 38th

Aye D Sánchez, Linda CA 39th

No R Royce, Edward “Ed” CA 40th

Aye R Lewis, Jerry CA 41st

Aye R Miller, Gary CA 42nd

Aye D Baca, Joe CA 43rd

Aye R Calvert, Ken CA 44th

Aye R Bono Mack, Mary CA 45th

No R Rohrabacher, Dana CA 46th

No Vote D Sanchez, Loretta CA 47th

No R Campbell, John CA 48th

Aye R Issa, Darrell CA 49th

Aye R Bilbray, Brian CA 50th

No Vote D Filner, Bob CA 51st

Aye R Hunter, Duncan CA 52nd

Aye D Davis, Susan CA 53rd



Colorado

No D DeGette, Diana CO 1st

No D Polis, Jared CO 2nd

No R Tipton, Scott CO 3rd

Aye R Gardner, Cory CO 4th

Aye R Lamborn, Doug CO 5th

No R Coffman, Mike CO 6th

Aye D Perlmutter, Ed CO 7th



Connecticut

Aye D Larson, John CT 1st

Aye D Courtney, Joe CT 2nd

No D DeLauro, Rosa CT 3rd

Aye D Himes, James CT 4th

No D Murphy, Christopher CT 5th



Delaware

Aye D Carney, John DE



Florida

Aye R Miller, Jeff FL 1st

Aye R Southerland, Steve FL 2nd

Aye D Brown, Corrine FL 3rd

Aye R Crenshaw, Ander FL 4th

Aye R Nugent, Richard FL 5th

Aye R Stearns, Clifford “Cliff” FL 6th

Aye R Mica, John FL 7th

Aye R Webster, Daniel FL 8th

Aye R Bilirakis, Gus FL 9th

No Vote R Young, Bill FL 10th

Aye D Castor, Kathy FL 11th

Aye R Ross, Dennis FL 12th

Aye R Buchanan, Vern FL 13th

No R Mack, Connie FL 14th

No R Posey, Bill FL 15th

Aye R Rooney, Thomas FL 16th

Aye D Wilson, Frederica FL 17th

Aye R Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana FL 18th

Aye D Deutch, Ted FL 19th

Aye D Wasserman Schultz, Debbie FL 20th

No Vote R Diaz-Balart, Mario FL 21st

Aye R West, Allen FL 22nd

No D Hastings, Alcee FL 23rd

Aye R Adams, Sandy FL 24th

Aye R Rivera, David FL 25th



Georgia

Aye R Kingston, Jack GA 1st

Aye D Bishop, Sanford GA 2nd

Aye R Westmoreland, Lynn GA 3rd

No D Johnson, Henry “Hank” GA 4th

No D Lewis, John GA 5th

Aye R Price, Tom GA 6th

No R Woodall, Rob GA 7th

Aye R Scott, Austin GA 8th

No R Graves, Tom GA 9th

Aye R Broun, Paul GA 10th

Aye R Gingrey, John “Phil” GA 11th

Aye D Barrow, John GA 12th

Aye D Scott, David GA 13th



Hawaii

Aye D Hanabusa, Colleen HI 1st

Aye D Hirono, Mazie HI 2nd



Iowa

No D Braley, Bruce IA 1st

Aye D Loebsack, David IA 2nd

Aye D Boswell, Leonard IA 3rd

Aye R Latham, Thomas “Tom” IA 4th

Aye R King, Steve IA 5th



Idaho

No R Labrador, Raúl ID 1st

No R Simpson, Michael “Mike” ID 2nd



Illinois

No D Rush, Bobby IL 1st

No D Jackson, Jesse IL 2nd

Aye D Lipinski, Daniel IL 3rd

No Vote D Gutiérrez, Luis IL 4th

No D Quigley, Mike IL 5th

Aye R Roskam, Peter IL 6th

No D Davis, Danny IL 7th

No R Walsh, Joe IL 8th

No D Schakowsky, Janice “Jan” IL 9th

Aye R Dold, Bob IL 10th

Aye R Kinzinger, Adam IL 11th

No D Costello, Jerry IL 12th

Aye R Biggert, Judy IL 13th

Aye R Hultgren, Randy IL 14th

Vote Party Representative District

No R Johnson, Timothy IL 15th

Aye R Manzullo, Donald IL 16th

Aye R Schilling, Robert “Bobby” IL 17th

Aye R Schock, Aaron IL 18th

Aye R Shimkus, John IL 19th



Indiana

Aye D Visclosky, Peter IN 1st

Aye D Donnelly, Joe IN 2nd

No R Stutzman, Marlin IN 3rd

No R Rokita, Todd IN 4th

No R Burton, Dan IN 5th

No R Pence, Mike IN 6th

No D Carson, André IN 7th

No R Bucshon, Larry IN 8th

Aye R Young, Todd IN 9th



Kansas

No R Huelskamp, Tim KS 1st

Aye R Jenkins, Lynn KS 2nd

Aye R Yoder, Kevin KS 3rd

Aye R Pompeo, Mike KS 4th



Kentucky

Aye R Whitfield, Edward “Ed” KY 1st

Aye R Guthrie, Brett KY 2nd

No D Yarmuth, John KY 3rd

Aye R Davis, Geoff KY 4th

Aye R Rogers, Harold “Hal” KY 5th

Aye D Chandler, Ben KY 6th



Louisiana

Aye R Scalise, Steve LA 1st

No D Richmond, Cedric LA 2nd

Aye R Landry, Jeff LA 3rd

Aye R Fleming, John LA 4th

Aye R Alexander, Rodney LA 5th

Aye R Cassidy, Bill LA 6th

Aye R Boustany, Charles LA 7th



Massachusetts

No D Olver, John MA 1st

No D Neal, Richard MA 2nd

No D McGovern, James “Jim” MA 3rd

No D Frank, Barney MA 4th

Aye D Tsongas, Niki MA 5th

No D Tierney, John MA 6th

No D Markey, Edward “Ed” MA 7th

No D Capuano, Michael MA 8th

No Vote D Lynch, Stephen MA 9th

Aye D Keating, William MA 10th



Maryland

No R Harris, Andy MD 1st

Aye D Ruppersberger, Dutch MD 2nd

No D Sarbanes, John MD 3rd

No D Edwards, Donna MD 4th

Aye D Hoyer, Steny MD 5th

Aye R Bartlett, Roscoe MD 6th

No D Cummings, Elijah MD 7th

No D Van Hollen, Christopher “Chris” MD 8th



Maine

No D Pingree, Chellie ME 1st

No D Michaud, Michael ME 2nd



Michigan

Aye R Benishek, Dan MI 1st

No R Huizenga, Bill MI 2nd

No R Amash, Justin MI 3rd

Aye R Camp, David “Dave” MI 4th

Aye D Kildee, Dale MI 5th

Aye R Upton, Frederick “Fred” MI 6th

No R Walberg, Timothy MI 7th

Aye R Rogers, Michael “Mike” MI 8th

No D Peters, Gary MI 9th

Aye R Miller, Candice MI 10th

Aye R McCotter, Thaddeus “Thad” MI 11th

Aye D Levin, Sander MI 12th

No D Clarke, Hansen MI 13th

No D Conyers, John MI 14th

Aye D Dingell, John MI 15th



Minnesota

Aye D Walz, Timothy MN 1st

Aye R Kline, John MN 2nd

Aye R Paulsen, Erik MN 3rd

No D McCollum, Betty MN 4th

No D Ellison, Keith MN 5th

No Vote R Bachmann, Michele MN 6th

Aye D Peterson, Collin MN 7th

Aye R Cravaack, Chip MN 8th



Missouri

No D Clay, William MO 1st

Aye R Akin, Todd MO 2nd

Aye D Carnahan, Russ MO 3rd

Aye R Hartzler, Vicky MO 4th

No D Cleaver, Emanuel MO 5th

Aye R Graves, Samuel “Sam” MO 6th

Aye R Long, Billy MO 7th

Aye R Emerson, Jo Ann MO 8th

Aye R Luetkemeyer, Blaine MO 9th



Mississippi

Aye R Nunnelee, Alan MS 1st

No D Thompson, Bennie MS 2nd

Aye R Harper, Gregg MS 3rd

Aye R Palazzo, Steven MS 4th



Montana

Aye R Rehberg, Dennis “Denny” MT



North Carolina

Aye D Butterfield, George “G.K.” NC 1st

Aye R Ellmers, Renee NC 2nd

No R Jones, Walter NC 3rd

No D Price, David NC 4th

Aye R Foxx, Virginia NC 5th

No Vote R Coble, Howard NC 6th

Aye D McIntyre, Mike NC 7th

Aye D Kissell, Larry NC 8th

No Vote R Myrick, Sue NC 9th

Aye R McHenry, Patrick NC 10th

Aye D Shuler, Heath NC 11th

No D Watt, Melvin “Mel” NC 12th

No D Miller, Bradley “Brad” NC 13th



North Dakota

Aye R Berg, Rick ND



Nebraska

Aye R Fortenberry, Jeffrey NE 1st

Aye R Terry, Lee NE 2nd

Aye R Smith, Adrian NE 3rd



New Hampshire

Aye R Guinta, Frank NH 1st

Aye R Bass, Charles “Charlie” NH 2nd





MORE...

H.R. 1540: National Defense Authorization Act for ... (On the Conference Report) -- GovTrack.us


Ron Paul Refuses to Endorse Romney - CNBC 10/11/2012 - YouTube