Thread: ALERT If your Representative is not on this list GET BUSY

Get your house reps to co sign this bill if they are not on the list.
TODAY PEOPLE TODAY WE NEED TO KEEP UP THE PRESSURE ON AND NOT ALLOW THE PRESIDENT SO MUCH POWER.
PERSONALLY I PREFER GOLD OR THE US DOLLAR.What say you people
I know it is off topic but is it really It is all connected.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

H.J.RES.41
Title: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit the President from entering into a treaty or other international agreement that would provide for the United States to adopt as legal tender in the United States a currency issued by an entity other than the United States.
Sponsor: Rep Bachmann, Michele [MN-6] (introduced 3/25/2009) Cosponsors (34)
Latest Major Action: 3/25/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COSPONSORS(34), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]: (Sort: by date)
Rep Akin, W. Todd [MO-2] - 3/25/2009 Rep Bachus, Spencer [AL-6] - 3/30/2009
Rep Bartlett, Roscoe G. [MD-6] - 3/25/2009 Rep Biggert, Judy [IL-13] - 3/25/2009
Rep Blackburn, Marsha [TN-7] - 3/25/2009 Rep Broun, Paul C. [GA-10] - 3/25/2009
Rep Brown, Henry E., Jr. [SC-1] - 3/25/2009 Rep Burton, Dan [IN-5] - 3/25/2009
Rep Conaway, K. Michael [TX-11] - 3/25/2009 Rep Culberson, John Abney [TX-7] - 3/25/2009
Rep Fallin, Mary [OK-5] - 3/25/2009 Rep Fleming, John [LA-4] - 3/25/2009
Rep Foxx, Virginia [NC-5] - 3/25/2009 Rep Franks, Trent [AZ-2] - 4/1/2009
Rep Gingrey, Phil [GA-11] - 3/25/2009 Rep Gohmert, Louie [TX-1] - 3/25/2009
Rep Hensarling, Jeb [TX-5] - 3/25/2009 Rep Hoekstra, Peter [MI-2] - 4/2/2009
Rep Issa, Darrell E. [CA-49] - 3/25/2009 Rep Jones, Walter B., Jr. [NC-3] - 3/25/2009
Rep King, Steve [IA-5] - 3/25/2009 Rep Kirk, Mark Steven [IL-10] - 3/25/2009
Rep Lamborn, Doug [CO-5] - 3/25/2009 Rep Marchant, Kenny [TX-24] - 4/2/2009
Rep McClintock, Tom [CA-4] - 3/25/2009 Rep McCotter, Thaddeus G. [MI-11] - 3/30/2009
Rep Paul, Ron [TX-14] - 3/25/2009 Rep Pitts, Joseph R. [PA-16] - 3/25/2009
Rep Posey, Bill [FL-15] - 3/25/2009 Rep Price, Tom [GA-6] - 3/25/2009
Rep Roe, David P. [TN-1] - 3/25/2009 Rep Shadegg, John B. [AZ-3] - 3/25/2009
Rep Thompson, Glenn [PA-5] - 3/25/2009 Rep Wamp, Zach [TN-3] - 3/25/2009



THOMAS Home | Contact | Accessibility | Legal | FirstGov

ALSO IT IS TIME TO PUSH BACK

Will the Real Secretary Geithner Please Stand Up?
April 3, 2009by Phyllis Schlafly
Does Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner favor replacing the U.S. dollar with a global currency, or doesn't he? Or, as Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) pointedly asked on Sean Hannity's program, "Which Tim Geithner do we believe?"
Let's review the soundbites of the week of March 23.
On Monday, China and Russia urged the world to replace the U.S. dollar as the world's standard with a new currency. This anti-American notion was floated by Zhou Xiaochuan, Governor of Communist China's Central Bank, along with urging an increased role for the International Monetary Fund in order to protect world financial markets from the Federal Reserve printing more dollars.
On Tuesday, during a House Financial Services Committee hearing, Rep. Michele Bachmann asked Treasury Secretary Geithner if he would "categorically renounce the United States moving away from the dollar and going to a global currency" as suggested by China and Russia. He replied "I would, yes."
Rep. Bachmann then asked for confirmation of that reply, and included Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, who was also sitting at the witness table, in her question: "You 'categorically,' and the Federal Reserve chair?" Geithner indicated assent, and Bernanke responded, "I would, also."
On Wednesday, during an appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, banker Doug Smith asked Secretary Geithner about China's proposal to replace the dollar as the world's reserve currency. Geithner responded that "we're actually quite open to that suggestion," adding that we should think of it as "evolutionary" and as "building on the current architecture" of the world's currency rather than moving to global monetary union.
Secretary Geithner spent the rest of the day trying (as bureaucrats would say) to clarify his remarks while the dollar fell sharply in currency trading. On the Sean Hannity program, Rep. Bachmann recited the colloquy and said, "Secretary Geithner has left the option on the table. I want to know which it is. The American people deserve to know."
On Thursday, a United Nations panel of expert economists pressed for a new global currency reserve system made up of dollars, euros, sterling, yen, and others. You can bet that any plan concocted by the UN that mentions "global equity" will involve more transfers of U.S. wealth to other countries.
By the end of the week, Rep. Bachmann had introduced H.J.Res. 41, proposing an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to prohibit the President from entering into a treaty or other international agreement that would provide for the United States to adopt as legal tender a currency issued by any entity other than the United States. She had no trouble attracting co-sponsors.
On the eve of the opening of the G20 Summit in London on April 2, Geithner expanded on his views for "new rules of the game." He said, "Our hope is that we can work with Europe on a global framework, a global infrastructure which has appropriate global oversight, so we don't have a Balkanized system at the global level, like we had at the national level."
It's no wonder that commentators are starting to refer to a possible world currency as the "globo."
Were Geithner's contradictory remarks a gaffe or a political trial balloon? Surely the Obama Administration must know that loose talk about a global currency is not acceptable to the American people.
Ever since President George W. Bush went to Waco in 2005 to meet with Vicente Fox and announced the Security and Prosperity Partnership, the internet and the blogs have been buzzing with speculation about a plan to put the United States into a North American Union along with a common currency already labeled the amero. Government officials and various elites have been issuing impassioned denials that any such plan exists.
But now we have it from our highest financial authority, Secretary Geithner, that a world currency is on the table of international discussions. And he implies that we shouldn't be surprised because it is "evolutionary" in our existing financial "architecture."
That is how the Europeans were tricked into the European Union (EU) by their governments, mostly without any vote by the people. The EU started out as just a trade agreement, but it evolved into a political union that ultimately replaced national currencies with a common currency called the euro.
Wasn't one of Obama's strong selling points in winning the presidency that he would restore foreign friendship for the United States in the post-George W. Bush era? Now, as Obama plans his first presidential trip overseas, he faces world antagonism not only to America and our foreign policy, but especially to our economic system and to Obama's grand design to use trillion-dollar government spending to promote U.S. recovery.
.................................................. .................................................. ..

this is for real folks!!!!! americangal4ever
THIS IS WHERE WE CAN PUSH BACK

yahoo, mine is already there

My Representative is listed. He is running for Governor and a thank you call to those who have signed in support would be a good gesture. Our Senators and Congressmen need to hear from us when they do something positive.

Psalm 139:14