Thread: Andrew Breitbart died of "natural causes"???

Originally Posted by artclam

I don't see it at all unusual for the coroner to rule the death natural. Mr. Breitbart was under a doctor's care for heart problems. It is SOP for the death of someone under a doctor's care to be natural. The doctor signing the death certificate has a lot of do with the decision. I'm guessing the doctor who signed the certificate in this case is Mr Breitbart's doctor. If he is satisfied that the death is natural it is hard for the coroner to disagree. Does anyone know who signed the death certificate? Has the death certificate been made public?

However, the possibility of murder should be considered whenever there is a death of a controversial public figure. This does not mean concocting a conspiracy theory. It only takes a single person to perform a murder.

The coroner's office has not ruled Breitbart's death to be natural causes yet.

The Los Angeles Times ran headline claiming Natural Causes after Andrew Breitbart's attorney said they were thinking it was natural causes but would not know until the autopsy and coroner's report were complete.

We have a situation here where a liberal pro illegal alien invasion newspaper and some others are trying to claim NATURAL CAUSES before that can be known by anyone. That is creating a lot of suspicion.

W

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

The coroner's office has not ruled Breitbart's death to be natural causes yet.

The Los Angeles Times ran headline claiming Natural Causes after Andrew Breitbart's attorney said they were thinking it was natural causes but would not know until the autopsy and coroner's report were complete.

We have a situation here where a liberal pro illegal alien invasion newspaper and some others are trying to claim NATURAL CAUSES before that can be known by anyone. That is creating a lot of suspicion.

W

I agree they created the suspicion by deciding to print immediately that it was natural causes when they do not normally do that and natural cause cannot be established that quick.
I think this is a very informative thread.

Andrew Breitbart's medical history was certainly predictive of a heart attack. However, his last interview was with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who had just announced the results of his Cold Case Posse investigation of Mr. Obama's fraudulent, forged birth documents and Selective Service registration. That final contact provides probable cause to investigate whether he was assassinated before he could broadcast that interview. I hope and pray that before he died, he passed along that interview to Sean Hannity (or Stephen Bannon, or Michael Savage), even though Sean Hannity has been gagged (with rare exceptions) about the Obama Constitutional ineligibility issue ever since his first mention of it.

Pastor James David Manning insists on an impartial investigation of Andrew Breitbart's death to search out a possible murder, rather than to just accept without question his heart trouble as the cause of his death. He is "convinced that we're gonna find that there's been foul play." But to accuse, "they've gone to murder," without evidence, is uncalled for, IMO.

There would certainly be motive for murder;
is not also suspicion of murder reasonable, and an investigation justifiable as well?

May Andrew Breitbart indeed rest in peace. But his blood may be crying out from the ground.

Originally Posted by Pastor James David Manning

If Breitbart has been whacked, we shouldn't allow it! And we should not rest until we have determined the absolute truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the stomp-down truth. We should not rest! If they have whacked him...

If we, one of us were whacked, Breitbart would risk his life, limb, and everything that he is, to discover the truth, and he would use tactics that he has been known to use so proficiently to gather that truth. If one of us were whacked, Breitbart would come to our aid! He would investigate! And we need to come to the aid of Andrew Breitbart, one and all!

And those of you who have never made any public statements or never supported in any way the removal of this fraudulent, and the exposure of this fraudulent Barack Obama, this radical, this Mus|im...

We should not allow the death of Andrew Breitbart to go unchallenged!

We allowed Terry Lakin to be prosecuted, court martialed, and sent to a dungeon in Fort Leavenworth.
We allowed Walter Francis Fitzpatrick to be beaten and sent to a dungeon in Monroe County.
We've allowed Sgt. Moran to be drugged and medicated and drummed out of the Air Force.
We've allowed this, but enough is enough! Enough is enough! We will not stand by now that they've gone to murder!

My friends, I'm calling on you everywhere, one and all, one and all, that we should not allow the death of our colleague to go uninvestigated!
Rise up, America. Rise up, and unite. And demand that we get the truth about Andrew Breitbart and why he's left us so suddenly.
And I'm convinced that we're gonna find that there's been foul play.
He would do it for you; I'm going to do it for him.

I'm James David Manning... and don't you ever forget it! Don't you ever forget it!
I'm a servant of the most high God! Don't you ever forget it!

Breitbart's Death Needs to be Investigated - YouTube , beginning at 13:17 .

Andrew Breitbart's last
interview was with Sheriff Joe Arpaio,
immediately after his press conference
about the findings of his Cold Case
Posse investigation into the fraudulent,
fabricated Barack Obama LFBC and
Selective Service registration form.

The obvious motive to assassinate Breitbart
before he could inform his large audience of
the results of the Cold Case Posse investi-
gation is, at the very least, probable cause to
independently VERIFY the coroner's findings
if/when he does rule AB died of natural causes.

In the meantime, doesn't it seem very odd -
even suspicious - that the media proclaimed
the cause of death the way that they did -
BEFORE the coroner examined the body?

atlah.org/2012/03/03/can-you-hear-me-andrew-breitbart/

The real "unfounded conspiracy" is the foregone
conclusion reported by the Lamestream Media,
that Andrew Breitbart died of natural causes.
There is NO EVIDENCE on which to base ANY
CONCLUSION until a medical examination isdone.

Meanwhile, the LSM are peddling and pushing
that same old, "Move along, nothing to see here."
It's obvious that the LSM are actively attempting
to sweep AB's cause of death under the rug, at
the same time that they are attempting to sweep
the Arpaio Report on the results of
the Cold Case Posse investigation under the rug.

Im thinking we should hear some initial autopsy reports very soon. If not, the silence will be deafening.
W

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

Im thinking we should hear some initial autopsy reports very soon. If not, the silence will be deafening.
W

An autopsy was completed Friday, and the tests are expected to take several weeks. . .
@ Andrew Breitbart: Coroner wants to 'cover all the bases'
http://www.alipac.us/f9/andrew-breit...l-bases-252090

RELATED

One thing that may quell the talk of a conspiracy: Breitbart's father-in-law told the Associated Press that he had suffered heart problems in 2010.

@ http://www.alipac.us/f19/andrew-brei...galore-252041/

RELATED

http://www.alipac.us/f9/george-w-bus...causes-252275/