Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #11
    Senior Member johnwk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    2,516
    Edwin Kneedler makes crap up, re-writes history for judge in Arizona SB-1070 case!


    SEE: Judge doubts constitutionality of a portion of Arizona's immigration law


    "The ultimate authority for enforcing (immigration laws) vests in the United States," said Edwin Kneedler, the deputy solicitor general. "The framers were very concerned that one member of the union could embroil the nation in a controversy."


    Mr. Kneedler is correct that the founding fathers were concerned that one member of the union could embroil the nation in a controversy. But he made crap up when implying, that because a potential controversy may erupt over immigration “The ultimate authority for enforcing (immigration laws) vests in the United States," This is flat wrong and re-writing historical fact.


    Now let us look at the irrefutable facts. The truth is, the word “immigrationâ€

  2. #12
    Senior Member johnwk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    2,516
    Why is Arizona not challenging the federal government’s interfering in Arizona’s reserved policing powers which have never been relinquished to the federal government, and are constitutionally protected under the Tenth Amendment?

    Without this power being challenged by Arizona, its almost as if the whole case is a set up, a contrivance, to enlarge, by an opinion of the court, the federal government’s power!


    The big lie in this whole thing begins with the assumption the federal government has been granted exclusive power over “immigrationâ€

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •