Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #11
    Senior Member Kiara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    2,393
    This should be a sticky so it keeps getting attention.

  2. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3,757
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiara
    This should be a sticky so it keeps getting attention.
    I agree

    I just don't hear any of the budget hawks talking about these race based groups

  3. #13
    Senior Member roundabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,445
    Justthefacts wrote,
    I just don't hear any of the budget hawks talking about these race based groups
    Once you wrap your brain around the concept, which is a complete reversal of common sense, and realize that there is no money unless there is debt, then you will see things in a different light. It takes a bit to leave the farm and dive down the rabbit hole, but it makes more sense the farther down into the hole you go.

    You will not see much as far as budget cuts go. Even if there are cuts, there will be increases in other more obscure and unnoticed areas.

    This was the lesson(?)(manufacture the problem, and then present the solution) from the Great Depression.

    Debt provides money for farther progress. Without debt there is no money.

    Not only are the immigrants and illegals viewed as potential voters but moreso are seen as potential debtors, and all that are around them, support services, etc. and that is more important. They will also invest in Wall Street and then the investment bankers, and then the corporations can continue to buy the world, one legislator at a time if need be.

    Economic empowerment of a community is actually agreeing to indentured servitude, under the system of debt based money.

    So any destructive forces in society are seen as good in such a system based on debt, because destruction requires re-building, which incurs more debt. Destruction need not be just phsyical objects, roads, houses, etc. but can be based on other less tangible yet expensive infastrutures, ie, groups, societal issues that warrant expense, etc, etc,.........

    There is more to it, inflation and interest,............but, enough said.

    JMO

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •