Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree5Likes
  • 3 Post By MW
  • 1 Post By Judy
  • 1 Post By JohnDoe2

Thread: Change: DoJ No Longer Sharing Lawsuit Payouts With Activist Groups

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    MW
    MW is online now
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    19,843

    Change: DoJ No Longer Sharing Lawsuit Payouts With Activist Groups

    Change: DoJ No Longer Sharing Lawsuit Payouts With Activist Groups

    ED MORRISSEYPosted at 8:41 pm on June 7, 2017



    An important — and expensive — incentive for legal action involving the Department of Justice will come to an abrupt end. The DoJ announced this morning that it would end the practice of crafting settlements to lawsuits that resulted in significant financial awards to activists groups, a practice that had flourished in Barack Obama’s administration. A memo from Attorney General Jeff Sessions rejects this policy, saying any punitive and restorative damages collected in lawsuits should go to American taxpayers:


    In a memo sent to 94 U.S. attorneys’ offices early Wednesday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said he would end the practice that allowed companies to meet settlement burdens by giving money to groups that were neither victims nor parties to the case.

    Sessions said the money should, instead, go to the Treasury Department or victims.

    “When the federal government settles a case against a corporate wrongdoer, any settlement funds should go first to the victims and then to the American people—not to bankroll third-party special interest groups or the political friends of whoever is in power,” Sessions said in a statement.


    While the practice existed before the Obama administration, it flourished under Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch. The DoJ would pursue a case against a big-pocketed defendant, and then push them into a settlement that suddenly included contributions to any number of Democratic Party interest groups. Not only was this an inappropriate politicization of the DoJ and of attorney-client interests, it was also a big incentive to sue people so as to pay off constituencies. The DoJ’s announcement called it a “slush fund,” but it operated more like a shakedown.


    In another sense, CEI’s Ted Frank testified two years ago, this amounts to a usurpation of Congress’ power of the purse. The executive branch used this mechanism to spend billions on outside groups without Congressional authorization by laundering it through lawsuits:

    When the Justice Department negotiates settlements that send money to third parties instead of to the United States Treasury or to the primary victims of the challenged conduct without legislative authority, they violate separation of powers by effectively using executive-branch enforcement authority to create legislative spending power. The spending may evade laws and regulations limiting or controlling federal spending, or create or fund programs that Congress never would have agreed to spend. …

    If the Justice Department cannot take money from the U.S. Treasury to fund new programs and third parties without Congressional approval, it should not be able to ignore those checks on its power by structuring litigation settlements to bypass the Treasury and have defendants to spend that money on the executive branch’s preferred priorities—priorities that might never be authorized by Congress.

    Second, the de facto slush fund created by such Justice Department settlements evades Congressional oversight; neither courts nor the Justice Department are well situated to ensure that cy pres is effectively or efficiently used, and there is no evidence that the Justice Department has ever performed that oversight function itself.

    Third, such settlements create a conflict of interest that permits Justice Department officials to reward cronies and political allies at the expense of taxpayers. For example, Professor Richard Epstein criticized a Bush administration settlement with Bristol-Myers Squibb requiring them to endow a chair of ethics at the District of New Jersey U.S. Attorney’s alma mater, Seton Hall Law School; Investors Business Daily criticized the recent Bank of America settlement32 as a “raft of political payoffs to Obama constituency groups.


    Congress should have intervened long ago to put an end to this end-run, but Republicans have already been working on a statutory prohibition on this practice in the current session. The House Judiciary Committee still has that legislation on its docket, and it’s not clear if this will have any impact on the passion to pursue this reform, but it shouldn’t. Sessions changed policy to eliminate this back-door political financing of friendly activists by administrations, but that will only last as long as this administration, or maybe even this AG.

    Now that the practice has been suspended, it’s up to Congress to defend its separation-of-powers status and impose laws that will prevent this corruption from a later revival …. by presidents of either party, and for any constituencies.

    http://hotair.com/archives/2017/06/07/change-doj-no-longer-sharing-lawsuit-payouts-activist-groups/?utm_source=hadaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign= nl
    Judy, artist and Jean like this.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttp://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    41,757
    YIPPEE!!!! No more payouts to the ACLU!!
    MW likes this.

  3. #3
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    81,543
    Judy likes this.
    NO AMNESTY

    DON'T REWARD THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS

    BY GIVING THEM CITIZENSHIP


    Sign in and post comments.

  4. #4
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    59,590
    This is such refreshing and wonderful news! W
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5
    MW
    MW is online now
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    19,843
    Quote Originally Posted by ALIPAC View Post
    This is such refreshing and wonderful news! W
    You're right, it is.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttp://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,377
    No more pay outs to LaRaza, and others.

    Now we need to try to get the supposed Republican congress to stop the regular government hand outs to these groups.

Similar Threads

  1. Chick-fil-A no longer will fund traditional-marriage groups
    By Newmexican in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-20-2012, 03:50 PM
  2. Climate change no longer scary in Europe
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-22-2010, 10:16 PM
  3. ACTIVIST GROUPS HARBORING CRIMINAL ALIENS FROM ICE IN NYC!
    By ICEstorm in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-19-2009, 03:01 PM
  4. PA-Immigrant groups decry fingerprint sharing policy
    By FedUpinFarmersBranch in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-21-2009, 12:42 PM
  5. Longtime activist pushes for change
    By loservillelabor in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-30-2006, 05:03 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •