Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Corporations Grow Nervous About Participating in Republican Convention

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

    Corporations Grow Nervous About Participating in Republican Convention

    More blackmail from "Activists groups". Like the others, they are all Democrat organizations.....
    Corporations Grow Nervous About Participating in Republican Convention




    The Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla., in 2012.
    DAMON WINTER / THE NEW YORK TIMES

    By JONATHAN MARTIN and MAGGIE HABERMAN


    MARCH 30, 2016

    Some of the country’s best-known corporations are nervously grappling with what role they should play at the Republican National Convention, given the likely nomination of Donald J. Trump, whose divisive candidacy has alienated many women, blacks and Hispanics.

    An array of activist groups is organizing a campaign to pressure the companies to refuse to sponsor the gathering, which many of the corporations have done for the Republican and the Democratic Parties for decades.

    The pressure is emerging as some businesses and trade groups are privately debating whether to scale back their participation, according to interviews with more than a dozen lobbyists, consultants and fund-raisers directly involved in the conversations.
    Apple, Google and Walmart are among the companies assessing their plans for the convention, which will be held July 18 to 21 in Cleveland.

    In addition to Mr. Trump’s divisive politics, there is the possibility that protests, or even violence, will become a focus of attention at the convention. Mr. Trump has suggested that there will be “riots” if he is not chosen as the party’s nominee, and the city of Cleveland recently sought bids for about 2,000 sets of riot gear for its police force.

    A reduction in support from major corporations would be worrisome for Cleveland, which celebrated the awarding of the convention last year as a symbol of the city’s rebirth. The host committee is seeking to raise about $64 million for the event.
    “I have talked to several people at companies who have said, ‘I’ve always gone to the convention, I’ve always participated at some level, but this year we’re not putting it in our budget, we’re not going, we’re not going to sponsor any of the events going on,’ ” said Carla Eudy, a Republican fund-raising consultant.

    Walmart, which contributed $150,000 to the Republican convention in 2012, has yet to commit to contributing this year. “We haven’t made any decisions,” said Dan Bartlett, executive vice president of corporate affairs at Walmart, who emphasized that even before Mr. Trump’s rise, the company had been discussing reducing its involvement.

    Apple and Google declined to comment.

    Coca-Cola has declined to match the $660,000 it gave for the 2012 Republican convention, donating only $75,000 for this year and indicating that it does not plan to provide more.

    Kent Landers, a Coca-Cola spokesman, declined to explain the reduction in support. But officials at the company are trying to quietly defuse a campaign organized by the civil rights advocacy group Color of Change, which says it has collected more than 100,000 signatures on a petition demanding that Coca-Cola and other companies decline to sponsor the convention. Donating to the event, the petition states, is akin to endorsing Mr. Trump’s “hateful and racist rhetoric.”

    “These companies have a choice right now, a history-making choice,” said Rashad Robinson, the executive director of Color of Change. “Do they want riots brought to us by Coca-Cola?”

    The situation is especially delicate for Coca-Cola, which is based in Atlanta and has devoted significant resources for decades to appeal to minority groups.

    In the company’s Washington office, executives have been locked in conversations about how to handle the convention, according to two people directly involved in the discussions. In addition to donating cash, the beverage giant usually provides in-kind contributions, including sodas and other drinks.

    In a statement, Mr. Landers, the Coca-Cola spokesman, said the company had also provided $75,000 to the 2016 Democratic convention, adding, “The Coca-Cola Company is a nonpartisan business and does not endorse presidential candidates or nominees, nor do we endorse any specific party.”

    Emily Lauer, a spokeswoman for the Cleveland 2016 Host Committee, played down any concerns about fund-raising. She said corporations and other donors had already pledged $54 million of the $64 million needed.

    But a senior Republican official with direct knowledge of convention fund-raising said there was growing worry inside the party about whether donors would follow through with their pledges if Mr. Trump became the nominee.


    Graphic | 2016 Delegate Count and Primary Results The 2016 primaries and caucuses have begun. See results and upcoming primary dates.


    Asked how much of the $54 million the committee had in hand, Ms. Lauer said, “the majority.” The State of Ohio, the City of Cleveland and Cuyahoga County are contributing generously, she said, along with local businesses.

    But the question of what to do about the Republican convention is more complex for businesses than simply deciding whether to contribute to the host committee: They are also grappling with whether they should send their executives, whether they can just quietly give to ancillary events benefiting other Republicans, and even whether they ought to have their names removed from the off-site concerts that are often convention favorites.

    The issue is a touchy one for American businesses, which until now have largely avoided the delicate choice between possibly offending Mr. Trump’s passionate followers by distancing themselves from him, or angering the equally vocal constituencies opposed to his candidacy.

    “These are Maalox months for everyone,” said Bruce Haynes, a public-relations consultant at Purple Strategies, a Virginia-based bipartisan communications firm. “If this is going to look like 1968, there will be people that say, ‘That’s not where I want my product placement,’ ” he added, referring to clashes between the police and protesters at the Democratic convention in Chicago.

    The Color of Change campaign is now being joined by Hispanic, Muslim and women’s rights organizations. While Coke has been the focus of the convention push so far, the advocacy groups have also been in contact with Google, Cisco and AT&T and said the companies would be targeted if they did not withdraw their contributions and vow to give no more.

    Nita Chaudhary, a founder and executive director of UltraViolet, a women’s rights group, noted that many Republican governors had felt pressure from businesses over gay rights, as companies “compete with one another to be the most socially progressive.”

    She added, “Well, there’s no greater threat to women and people of color in this country than Donald Trump.”
    Representatives from Cisco and AT&T issued statements pointing to their technological support for both parties’ conventions in the past. They indicated that they would offer the same in-kind assistance this year, while emphasizing that their support was aimed at benefiting the democratic process. They declined to comment further.

    Color of Change has been effective in putting pressure on image-conscious companies. After the killing in Florida of an unarmed black teenager, Trayvon Martin, in 2012, for example, it helped persuade corporations like Coca-Cola, McDonald’s and Pepsi to leave the American Legislative Exchange Council, a conservative organization that promoted the “Stand Your Ground” gun laws that became divisive after Mr. Martin’s death.

    In a letter sent to Coca-Cola last month, Color of Change implored the company to withdraw its support for the Republican convention, saying the move would be “a sign of corporate leadership.”

    That letter was followed by a provocative online petition with an image of a Coca-Cola bottle labeled “Share a Coke with the K.K.K.,” an apparent reference to Mr. Trump having initially declined to disavow support from the former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke.

    The push by Color of Change got the attention of the Coca-Cola executives, who quietly reached out to Mr. Robinson, the group’s executive director, and, in a series of previously undisclosed telephone calls and email exchanges, sought to mollify the activist group.

    “We walked them through what a public campaign would look like,” Mr. Robinson recalled, explaining that he described possible protests outside Coca-Cola headquarters and in Cleveland against the company.

    Coca-Cola has not sought a refund of the $75,000 it gave to the Republican convention, nor has it agreed to refuse to make in-kind contributions.

    Other companies are hoping to avoid the controversy altogether. Some trade groups, including ones representing airlines and broadcasters, say they are planning to take a smaller role at both parties’ conventions this year.

    In addition to the strong feelings Mr. Trump generates, there are fears that fewer elected officials, to whom sponsors like to gain access at conventions, might attend if Mr. Trump is the nominee.

    The question of corporate involvement is not the only challenge. For the first time since the Nixon era, federal funds will not be provided to defray the cost of the conventions, putting a greater burden on the parties to raise money.

    Conventions are unwieldy productions that often exceed their budgets. In 2012, Mitt Romney’s national finance team helped raise money to cover the costs of the Republican convention in Tampa, Fla., and in 2004, when the Republican Party had its convention in New York, Michael R. Bloomberg, then the mayor, wrote a personal check to cover the host committee’s $2 million shortfall.

    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/03/31...ogle.com/&_r=0

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    This may be a stupid question, but I'll ask it anyway. Why is our convention dependent on corporations? Bernie Sanders raised $44 million in 1 month from on-line donations from his supporters. Can't the Republican Party raise $64 million every four years from our registered voters to pay for our convention without the political drama and sidekicks of corporate donations?

    Corporate donations to the Republican Convention makes absolutely no sense. If the people of the Republican Party don't care enough about our nomination process to fund the convention necessary to nominate our candidate, then we have a very serious problem with the convention process itself.

    The idea of Priebus or anyone else from the RNC having to dance around the offices of corporate America like someone from Club for Growth with their hands out for money to pay for our convention is embarrassing.

    The rules should bar these types of donations to pay for the convention. I'm sure the companies mean well, (right ....), but we need to find another way to pay for our convention. It's the Fox Watching the Hen House which never turns out well, if you get my drift.

    So it's time for the Establishment to start digging into their own pockets and putting their own money where their mouths sure seem to be. And that includes you Mitt Romney and Charlie Sykes.
    Last edited by Judy; 04-03-2016 at 02:00 PM.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. Republican Convention Rules
    By JohnDoe2 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-24-2016, 06:20 PM
  2. Republican Convention: I am snow blind
    By JohnDoe2 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-06-2008, 02:17 PM
  3. Schedule for the Republican National Convention
    By zeezil in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-31-2008, 08:57 AM
  4. Hold a Counter Republican Convention.
    By APACHEWHOKNOWS in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-06-2008, 05:43 PM
  5. Republican McCain says he's nervous but looks ahead
    By Skippy in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-03-2008, 11:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •