Thread: Disgusting Anchor Baby Video

Originally Posted by BrightNail

what school is that? And why is that school not being shut down for their obvious tratorious behaviour?

The school is in Santa Ana California. The 79% of the residents in Santa Ana speak NO English at all. It use to be a beautiful city in the 1950's. It's in Orange County CA. This is an important area. Orange County use to be known for being conservative. It's also an area that Loretta Sanchez and her sister influence.

FROM THAT LINK.......

Anchor Baby Power

La Voz de Aztlan has produced a video in honor of the millions of babies that have been born as US citizens to Mexican undocumented parents. These babies are destined to transform America. The nativist CNN reporter Lou Dobbs estimates that there are over 200,000 "Anchor Babies" born every a year whereas George Putnam, a radio reporter, says the figure is closer to 300,000. La Voz de Aztlan believes that the number is approximately 500,000 "Anchor Babies" born every year.

How many young, unmarried girls?
How many the result of rape by men who have no respect for women?
How many of them are on welfare?

Ron Paul supporters need to listen close. You will be disappointed in what he will really do. From what I hear is that he will not deport any illegal and will allow visa workers. He will take away the welfare but that's it. You need to see where he stands from his past and his voting history is a clue.

Originally Posted by Once_A_Democrat

Ron Paul supporters need to listen close. You will be disappointed in what he will really do. From what I hear is that he will not deport any illegal and will allow visa workers. He will take away the welfare but that's it. You need to see where he stands from his past and his voting history is a clue.

need to listen. I don't follow. From his site, and various interviews he has given it seems clear to me. In his debate he clearly and flatly stated "No Amnesty"... so, I am not sure what you are insinuating...

I think Ron Paul has the right of it... That Judge wouldn't of been able to turn that law over in Hazeltown. The judge said it was the federal jurisdiction, BUT Ron Paul says the cities/states will have their OWN SAY!

SO, all these cities/states passing laws and having them overturned would not happen... because those laws would be controlled by the local jurisdiction. To me, you have hundreds of battles going on right now that are being overturned because judges are interpreting who is in jurisdiction.. well, with Ron Paul, the cities and states are... SO THESE TOWNS WILL BE ABLE TO ENFORCE THE LAWS THEY WRITE!

What do you think?

Watch this video http://youtube.com/watch?v=Zc1XAQc8hS8

BrightNail wrote:

well, with Ron Paul, the cities and states are... SO THESE TOWNS WILL BE ABLE TO ENFORCE THE LAWS THEY WRITE!

Not good enough, because more cities will also write more sanctuary laws - there will be more in-state tuition - more state driver's licenses - city welfare, etc.. The only reason some cities haven't already written more laws favorable to illegal immigrants is because they know it's against our federal immigration laws. Unfortunately, it's a two-way street. Giving states and cities the power to write laws that are counter-productive to federal law would be a serious mistake. Are you saying this is what Ron Paul wants?

With that said, I see nothing wrong with writing laws that actually aid in enforcing federal law. To do so only enforces what federal law has already mandated, not counter the law.

Originally Posted by MW

BrightNail wrote:

well, with Ron Paul, the cities and states are... SO THESE TOWNS WILL BE ABLE TO ENFORCE THE LAWS THEY WRITE!

Not good enough, because more cities will also write more sanctuary laws - there will be more in-state tuition - more state driver's licenses - city welfare, etc.. The only reason some cities haven't already written more laws favorable to illegal immigrants is because they know it's against our federal immigration laws. Unfortunately, it's a two-way street. Giving states and cities the power to write laws that are counter-productive to federal law would be a serious mistake. Are you saying this is what Ron Paul wants?

With that said, I see nothing wrong with writing laws that actually aid in enforcing federal law. To do so only enforces what federal law has already mandated, not counter the law.

uhmmm.. Ron Paul specifically states that ANY BENEFITS.. be it school, welfare, etc.. SHOULD NOT be available to illegal immigrants. I think the juristiction lies in the fact that to "welfare" these people IS in violation of federal law becasue of the infringement on the american taxpayer.. BUT the enforcement is rather on a local level. I don't think its a matter of passing laws in "favor" of.. because in that case, some states could be "commuinist" or "socialist" and pass laws that are unamerican. No. I think the idea is for LOCAL and STATES offices to enforce laws.

Now, I could be wrong - but from what I am understanding is that places like "sanctuary" cities would be overturned because that is in viiolation of the law and ANY city/state can enforce it and to not is Unconstitutional....

you understand. In others words, instead of fed mircomanaging everything... the states/cities have more control to enforce laws..

"No welfare for illegal aliens. Americans have welcomed immigrants who seek opportunity, work hard, and play by the rules. But taxpayers should not pay for illegal immigrants who use hospitals, clinics, schools, roads, and social services. "

Originally Posted by Once_A_Democrat

Ron Paul supporters need to listen close. You will be disappointed in what he will really do. From what I hear is that he will not deport any illegal and will allow visa workers. He will take away the welfare but that's it. You need to see where he stands from his past and his voting history is a clue.

And how does Mitt Romney feel about this? Fred Thompson? What is with the constant attacks on Ron Paul?

should be an interesting race

At 1st I turned it off because of the silly song. But I turned it back on and watched the rest. It looks like Mexican children are being taught at an early age, the art of shouting and "banging" pretend drums, to get attention at protests. It's too bad that they are learning the "early stages" of criminal behavior handed down to them by their illegal parents.