Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    61,496

    Don't get fooled again: Trump and Congress can learn from Reagan and reform our immig

    Don't get fooled again: Trump and Congress can learn from Reagan and reform our immigration system

    By John Heubusch | Fox News

    Proponents of amnesty for illegal immigrants point to President Reagan as an iconic conservative leader who supported a path to legal status for such individuals in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. If it was good enough for President Reagan, they say, it should be good enough for today’s Republican Party.

    What these armchair historians often fail to say, however, is that President Reagan’s support for amnesty was part of a compromise that his congressional counterparts reneged on. In exchange for amnesty, Congress was supposed to fund and enforce the other half of the deal to make it unlawful to hire or recruit individuals illegally residing in the U.S. The compromise would have required employers to attest to their employees’ immigration status.

    However, no successive Congress since the Reagan years – regardless of which party held the majority – has ever lived up its side of the bargain. Democrats fear uproar from immigrants’ rights groups and organized labor. Republicans fear angering employers who count on cheap immigrant labor to fill low-paying, low-skill jobs.

    While Republican leaders today might emulate President Reagan’s willingness to compromise in the interest of halting the flow of illegal immigration, they would be wise to also learn from his experience. Were President Reagan around to advise Republicans today, he might remind them of the old adage: “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.”

    While it’s possible that President Reagan might still support a compromise today that includes a path to lawful status for immigrants here illegally, it’s a certainty that he would withhold that opportunity until Congress actually acts to dramatically reduce or eliminate the flow of illegal immigration into the U.S.

    A “Reaganesque” immigration reform package for today’s world would blend a willingness to compromise with an application of the lessons learned from 1986. It would prioritize border security before granting amnesty or a path to citizenship.

    Ronald Reagan was a fan of big, bipartisan, blue-ribbon commissions formed to tackle particularly tough issues outside the realm of congressional compromise. Fox example, a signature piece of legislation signed by President Reagan that saved Social Security in 1983 was the direct result of the recommendations of his National Commission on Social Security Reform.

    Such commissions were useful because they took hot potatoes out of the hands of Congress and put them into the hands of a bipartisan group created with the sole aim of finding common ground.

    Creating an immigration commission would be a way for President Trump to reach across the aisle to ensure that whatever agreement is made on immigration is bipartisan and earns enough support to avoid a Senate filibuster.

    As a student of the Reagan presidency who lived through the immigration debates on Capitol Hill during the Reagan years – and speaking for myself, not the Reagan Foundation – I’ve come to believe that a Reaganesque deal on immigration today could be structured around a provision that no amnesty or path to citizenship would be granted until such a blue-ribbon commission certifies that:

    *The border wall President Trump wants to build between the U.S. and Mexico is at least 75 percent complete.
    *The flow of illegal entries by immigrants into the U.S. has reached a specified minimum, reflecting a historic low.
    *At least 75 percent of U.S. employers have adopted an E-Verify type approach to dissuade future illegal immigration.

    Upon achieving the above goals, illegal immigrants on an approved list with no criminal history would be granted amnesty.

    How many immigrants here illegally would make it onto approved list and who would get on it?

    A compromise plan might offer amnesty and an eventual pathway to citizenship for 3.2 million undocumented immigrants – the same number granted the privilege under President Reagan’s reforms in 1986.

    If 3.2 million was appropriate for Reagan, it should be sellable today. Democrats will want to raise that number substantially. Republicans can determine how hard to hold the line to establish a solid bipartisan consensus.

    A blue ribbon commission might have better ideas. But no doubt it could be tasked with prioritizing qualifications – such as military service, “Dreamer” status, special work skills, or something else – for inclusion in the number of immigrants accepted.

    Once the commission certifies to Congress that the border wall is complete, those granted amnesty could legally apply for citizenship. All of those who reside in the U.S. illegally and do not apply for inclusion under the plan or who are not admitted under the cap for amnesty would need to self-deport by a certain date. They should be given enough time to arrange their affairs and safely and expeditiously return to their country of origin.

    Ronald Reagan embodied the idea of a “compassionate conservative” before it was a popular term. As he said in a 1984 debate: “I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and who have lived here, even though some time back they may have entered illegally.” But he also knew the importance of enforcement and of learning from one’s mistakes.

    Though he might support a path to legal status for today’s illegal immigrants, it’s difficult to imagine that President Reagan would repeat the mistakes of the 1986 immigration deal. Today’s Republican leaders who would follow in his footsteps should pursue a plan that puts enforcement first.

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/...on-system.html
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    41,757
    No commission, hiss boo, bad idea. Trump knows what to do and he'll do it. There is no "bipartisanship" on this issue. It's war, ideological, constitutional, financial, economic, political and social. Americans know what needs to be done, that's why they elected Donald Trump our 45th President of the United States, just support him and let him do his job.

  3. #3
    MW
    MW is online now
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    19,802
    Quote Originally Posted by Judy View Post
    No commission, hiss boo, bad idea. Trump knows what to do and he'll do it. There is no "bipartisanship" on this issue. It's war, ideological, constitutional, financial, economic, political and social. Americans know what needs to be done, that's why they elected Donald Trump our 45th President of the United States, just support him and let him do his job.
    I'm not a Trump cheerleader, so I will say this, Trump has been inconsistent on the amnesty issue throughout his campaign and into his presidency. He is too easily influenced by the media and those he has tied himself to (advisers & cabinet members) for us to just sit on our hands and wait for him to take care of everything. We've been lied to and let down too many times in the past to place complete trust in any single politician. We must remain vigilant and continue to push him in the right direction, I'll support him when he's right, but I will certainly let it be known when he does something wrong.

    Faith can be a good thing but 'blind' faith can bite you in the butt!

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttp://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    41,757
    LOL!! You aren't even a Trump Supporter, MW. Why do you want to belittle Trump Supporters as "blind"? Do you really think you're smarter than we are? LOL!!! With "conservatives" like you, we'd all be waking up every morning to Madam President.

Similar Threads

  1. Don’t be fooled by media — Trump is in it to win it
    By lorrie in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-17-2016, 10:29 PM
  2. Asian-Americans in Congress Urge Obama to Reform Immig.
    By Texas2step in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-23-2009, 06:34 PM
  3. 'Immig. Rights Groups' from SW Press Congress on Reform
    By Texas2step in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-20-2008, 04:37 PM
  4. Congress Kills Fence, Proving Comp. Immig. Reform a Sham
    By zeezil in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-11-2008, 06:35 AM
  5. Don't Be Fooled By Fake Immigration Reform
    By Brian503a in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-22-2005, 01:48 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •