Thread: EU/US Merger: New Global Order By Stealth

Few notice huge shift towards globalization as frothing masses distracted by climate change debate

In a sweeping move that has garnered surprisingly little attention this week the United States and the European Union have signed up to a new transatlantic economic partnership that will see regulatory standards "harmonized" and will lay the basis for a merging of the US and EU into one single market, a huge step on the path to a new globalized world order.

The BBC reported from the Summit in Washington on Monday:

The two sides agreed to set up an "economic council" to push ahead with regulatory convergence in nearly 40 areas, including intellectual property, financial services, business takeovers and the motor industry.
Skipping over what the fall out from a single Western market will be, the BBC simply announced "The aim is to increase trade and lower costs." before moving swiftly on to analyse what this means in terms of global warming.

While the masses are being whipped up into a never ending frenzy over climate change at every given opportunity, hardcore political actions that will affect the lives of everyone on the planet in the here and now are being skated over with little or no attention being paid to them.

The proponents and architects of a one world order have worked long and hard behind the scenes for a long time pushing a gradual erosion of national sovereignty via a harmonization of all areas of life, economic, social, cultural and environmental.

Such harmonization and elimination of diversity is the only way to maximize the profit of the few at the expense of the many, while maintaining tight controls over society as a whole in order for a long continuation of that status quo.

The global corporate elite are the only ones who will benefit from essentially wiping out the free market and eliminating economic competition across nations.

The EU has long been used as a tool for such harmonizing globalization and has now reached the point at which it has become a supranational federal government for Europe. Over the years, what was originally sold as a simple free trade treaty has slowly been built from the bottom up into an all encompassing monolithic authority over the entire region.

The areas it now seeks to dominate also include public health, social policy, transport, justice, agriculture, fisheries, energy, economic and social cohesion, the environment, internal and external trade, and consumer protection.

It has recently been highlighted that European globalists such as Britain's Tony Blair and Germany's Angela Merkel are seeking to implement by stealth areas of the EU constitution regardless of its blanket rejection by voters. Senior British Cabinet sources have warned that they are also pushing hard for Brussels to be given a full-time unelected president, who would serve a five year term and speak as the voice of Europe on the world stage.

It is commonly accepted that reforms to strengthen the European Parliament, scheduled to be implemented before 2009, could undermine the ability of member states to opt out of EU laws, as Britain does at present, effectively ending national sovereignty.

In their important history of the EU, The Great Deception, British authors Christopher Booker and Richard North, concluded that the 27 member nations now entangled in the union have ceded their sovereignty in a carefully planned stealth operation. They grudgingly credit european globalists with accomplishing "a slow-motion coup d’etat: the most spectacular coup d’etat in history."

The authors of The Great Deception summarized the effect of the Treaty of Rome: "Thus did the central deception of the whole story become established. From now on, the real agenda, political integration, was to be deliberately concealed under the guise of economic integration. Building Europe was to be presented as a matter of trade and jobs."

In addition dissidents and outcasts such as Vladimir Bukovksy have warned that an elite plan has long existed whereby the EU would be hijacked and transformed into a Soviet style Socialist superstate that would eliminate the individual nation state's power and create a governing body with no accountability or direct representation.

In 2003 the BBC uncovered incredible archived documents which confirmed that both the EU and its single currency, the Euro, were the brainchild of the secretive Bilderberg Group. Some 50 years BEFORE the implementation of the European single currency, Bilderberg, now infamous as the secret elite hand behind world events, had drawn up the plans.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let us help you reach a huge audience of potential customers. Help support the website and take advantage of low advertising rates. Click here for more info.
Find out the true story behind government sponsored terror, 7/7, Gladio and 9/11, get Terror Storm!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition to the EU, an agenda for a North American Union is now beyond doubt and is well on course according to the internal policy documents of its unelected legislators, the Council on Foreign Relations.

The CFR's North American Union mirrors Bilderberg's European Union. In the CFR's document, Building a North American Community, mention is given to the Bilderberg group in a recommendation that private bodies be formed to direct policy between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The document states:

"To ensure a regular injection of creative energy into the various efforts related to North American integration, the three governments should appoint an independent body of advisers. This body should be composed of eminent persons from outside government, appointed to staggered multiyear terms to ensure their independence. Their mandate would be to engage in creative exploration of new ideas from a North American perspective and to provide a public voice for North America. A complementary approach would be to establish private bodies that would meet regularly or annually to buttress North American relationships, along the lines of the Bilderberg..."
Very much like the EU, provisions for a NAU such as NAFTA and GATT were sold at their inception as free trade agreements. As time has progressed we have witnessed the birth of the "Security and Prosperity Partnership", a treaty, which seems to be a little more than a simple economic agreement, between leaders of the US, Mexico and Canada that has been agreed without Congressional oversight.

A Canadian report has described the SPP as "an international framework for trilateral and bilateral cooperation in North America" that is "not a formal international treaty" or "an overarching binding legal agreement." But what is an "international framework" that commits U.S. officials from various federal agencies to working with officials of two other countries? Why is such a process not subjected to congressional scrutiny and approval?

Last September we reported that Journalist Jerome Corsi had received the first documents pertaining to a FOIA request asking for full disclosure of the SPP office in its activities towards creating a Pan American Union.

The documents show that a wide range of US administrative law is being re-written in stealth under this program to "integrate" and "harmonize" with administrative law in Mexico and Canada, just as has become commonplace within the EU.

The documents contain references to upwards of 13 working groups within an entire organized infrastructure that has drawn from officials within most areas of administrative government including U.S. departments of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Health and Human Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

Corsi also reported that at a recent high-level confab in Banff, an assistant U.S. secretary of state, Thomas A. Shannon , chaired a panel that featured a presentation by Prof. Robert Pastor, author of a book promoting the development of a North American union as a regional government and the adoption of the amero as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar and the peso.

Just a conspiracy theory? Not according to Steve Previs of Jefferies International who stated on CNBC, "I think one thing for people who are dollar based need to focus on is the Amero, that's the one thing that nobody is talking about that I think is going to have a big impact... on everybody's life in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico..."



A global crash, predicted by former World Bank chief economist and nobel prize winner Joseph Stiglitz, and a totally devalued dollar that can barely rival the peso are greasing the skids for a single North American currency. This spells disaster for all Americans who wish to maintain their standard of living and not find themselves barefoot on the street in a bread queue.

The decline of the economy in the US is being caused by the very predatory globalist policies of the IMF and World Bank that are still presented to us as the solution for economic turmoil. These two globalist vampires have drained the third world dry, and are now focusing their attention on enslaving the developed world.

The single currency and a 'new economic order' is a major step on the road to global governance. Europe already has its own strong single currency, while the dollar's days seem to be numbered. When money is being printed by a private corporation is it any surprise to see a push for a merger with other countries' currencies?

Talk has long been of a global currency by 2018 if plans go accordingly. A 1988 famous cover of The Economist emphasized this, depicting a phoenix standing atop burning paper money symbolizing its rise out of their destruction, with the words "Get ready for a world currency" next to it.

The article carried in The Economist, titled "Get Ready for the Phoenix," stated that, "THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency."

The article went on to state that sovereignty will be lost with the advent of the new currency, but that trends towards globalization are already doing away with it anyway.

"The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate - and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate- would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world."
"Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes," the article concludes.

In 2004 Robert Mundell, the Nobel-prize winning economist often credited with paving the way to the European single currency, called for a global currency.

In an interview with French paper Libération, Mundell said: "With the emergence of the euro and its instability against the dollar, Europe, the United States and the Asian powers should come together and create a new international monetary system."

In 2006 the scandal-ridden and highly secretive Bank For International Settlements, considered to be the world's top central banking policy, released a policy paper that called for the end of national currencies in favor of a global model of currency formats.

The BIS is a branch of the of the Bretton-Woods International Financial architecture and closely allied with the Bilderberg Group. It is controlled by an inner elite that represents all the world's major central banking institutions. John Maynard Keynes, perhaps the most influential economist of all time, wanted it closed down as it was used to launder money for the Nazis in World War II.

It appears we are now seeing the slow realization of a gloabal economic system with a single currency.

The end game of such regionalizing harmonization is of course a global government.

It has long been recognized that an instant world government would be roundly rejected by the masses and that a stepping stone agenda, a stealth implementation of a new global order is the key to its success.

Writing in the April 1974 issue of Foreign Affairs, the flagship publication of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Richard N. Gardner , who has held a number of State Department posts, argued against what he called "instant world government." Instead, he wrote, "the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."

In a similar sentiment, former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski pointed to "regionalization" as the key for "globalization" in his address to Gorbechev's State of the World Forum in October 1995: "The precondition for eventual globalization — genuine globalization — is progressive regionalization, because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units."

This week we have witnessed the first steps towards the biggest "cooperative unit" there has ever been with the groundwork being set for a EU-US single market. However, as the CFR would say, amidst the "booming, buzzing confusion" few have noticed.
http://www.infowars.net/articles/may2007/040507EUUS.htm

They are also talking about merging EU and African union together. Also Asean/Asian union to. So the pieces are coming together. This is serious.

Something else that should interest.


United states of Africasummit to focus on United States of Africa plan

ACCRA, May 04 -- African leaders are to meet in Ghana for an African Union summit at the end of next month to discuss ways of working towards a "United States of Africa", the bloc said in a statement Friday.

The summit, from June 25 to July 3, will be devoted to a "grand debate on the union government," the statement said.

"The ultimate goal of the African Union is full political and economic integration leading to the United States of Africa," it said.

The goal of political and economic integration of African countries has existed since the AU began in 2002, but the issue divides the body's 53 members.

The meeting will also see the appointment of new AU commissioners and a new commission president to replace Alpha Oumar Konare who has announced he will step down.

It will also discuss regional conflicts, notably in Darfur and Somalia, where the pan-African body has deployed a vanguard force of around 1,500 Ugandan peacekeepers.

Ghana currently holds the bloc's rotating leadership. President John Kufuor was elected its chairman during a summit in January after member states rejected Sudan's bid for the chair.

The AU, which replaced the Organisation of African Unity in 2002, comprises 53 African territories and aims to promote political, social and economic development as well as security on the continent. - AFP


http://news.africast.com/africastv/arti ... wsID=61876

Considering the fact that the European Union (merger) isn't working out, this should be interesting.

With out our congress we have no chance to stop this and then maybe they can't stop it now, when you read this it almost looks hopeless, or inevitable, the way our currency is losing its value and the debt this country is in, looks to me just what they wanted is almost here.

Fred Thompson was just being interviewed by Hannity and he was saying Bush doesn't get enough credit for securing our borders around the perimeter of the Americas and how he's done so well with free trade. He has got to be a member of CFR. you can almost tell now by listening to them. The other day on csnbc they were talking about money and some guy was making a joke and said keep your eye on the Amero, then laughed.

This article is long but very interesting!

Originally Posted by girlygirl369

Considering the fact that the European Union (merger) isn't working out, this should be interesting.

Not true, they are still pulling ahead with out approval. In plan full and well to pass this in 2009 by cheating or what ever. Then the global government will repaidly come together. SICKING and unfair but true.

Originally Posted by SOSADFORUS

Fred Thompson was just being interviewed by Hannity and he was saying Bush doesn't get enough credit for securing our borders around the perimeter of the Americas and how he's done so well with free trade. He has got to be a member of CFR.

He is.

CREDIT for securing the border???? Done so well with trade???? And watch this clown step into the race and win I liked him a lot better in Days of Thunder and The Hunt for Red October......

I can see it now.....the USA solves the trade imbalence by merging with China into the World Union of Nations. This is getting scary, folks. There seems to be powers at work that are beyond our control. I used to think this was the stuff of conspiracy non-sense.....But its happening, we are living out the pages of Orwell.

Here is some more about the Aka Asian union.

http://www.brunei-online.com/bb/fri/may4h1.htm

Asean's single market vision

By Sonia K
The Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) is looking at becoming an economic community (AEC), in other words a competitive single market and production base, by 2015 and a blueprint for the realisation of AEC was discussed among other key issues related to the economic inputs to the Asean Charter and the future direction of Asean yesterday at the 13th Asean Economic Ministers Retreat meeting here.
The ministers also reviewed the Framework Agreement on Asean Investment Area; roadmap for the Logistics Sector; and status of FTAs with Dialogue Partners.

Gathered at the Empire Hotel and Country Club, the Asean ministers reaffirmed the decision that Asean should intensify its efforts to realise the goal of a competitive single market and production base. In this respect, it was again reiterated at the Retreat that there is a need to ensure timely implementation of commitments agreed to.

According to a media release from the Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Malaysia, the ministers also provided their views on the economic blueprint, which is currently being finalised for submission for the Asean Leaders' consideration at their Summit in November 2007.

The blueprint contains four main elements covering a single market and production base; a highly competitive economic region; a region of equitable economic development; and a region fully integrated into the global economy.

The blueprint will focus on enhancing the competitiveness of the region and ensuring equitable development. The blueprint is a cross-sectoral document covering all economic sectors in Asean including goods, services, investment, labour, transport, telecommunications, agriculture, finance, customs and standards.

Asean ministers also endorsed the Asean roadmap for the Logistics Sector. This document will be signed by the ministers during their meeting in August 2007 in Manila, the Philippines. The roadmap is aimed at strengthening the Asean economic integration through liberalisation and facilitation measures in the area of logistics services, and to support the creation of an integrated Asean logistics environment.

Enhancing the competitiveness of the logistics sector will benefit trade among Asean countries. For instance, Malaysia's exports in 2006 to Asean amounted to RM153.4 billion and imports totalled RM117.2 billion. Malaysia has already eliminated duties on 80 per cent of the products under the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) scheme of the Asean Free Trade Area (AFTA), the press release added.

The revision to the Asean Investment Area (AIA) Agreement has been undertaken to promote greater investor confidence in Asean. The revision is to expand the scope and coverage of the agreement to incorporate new features and provisions in line with current global developments.

"This is being done to continue to sustain FDI flows to the region and also enhance intra-Asean investment. FDI flows to the region in 2005 amounted to US$38.1 billion. Intra-Asean investment amounted to US$2.2 billion," the media release had said.

The ministers also exchanged views on the ongoing FTA negotiations with Dialogue Partners. Malaysia is currently in the process of issuing the Legal Enactment to effect tariff elimination for the FTA in goods between Asean and Korea effective June 1, 2007. This is the second FTA that Asean is implementing after China.



http://www.brunei-online.com/bb/fri/may4h1.htm

US and EU agree 'single market'



The United States and the European Union have signed up to a new transatlantic economic partnership at a summit in Washington.

The pact is designed to boost trade and investment by harmonising regulatory standards, laying the basis for a US-EU single market.

The two sides also signed an Open Skies deal, designed to reduce fares and boost traffic on transatlantic flights.

But little of substance was agreed on climate change.

However, EU leaders were pleased that the US acknowledged human activity was a major cause.

Richest regions

Economics rather than the environment or politics was the focus of the summit, says the BBC's Europe correspondent, Jonny Dymond, from Washington.

The two sides agreed to set up an "economic council" to push ahead with regulatory convergence in nearly 40 areas, including intellectual property, financial services, business takeovers and the motor industry.

The aim is to increase trade and lower costs.

Some reports suggest that incompatible regulations in the world's two richest regions add 10% to the cost of developing and producing new cars.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose country holds the EU's rotating presidency, said last month that if the US and EU could set business norms today, they would "secure the markets of tomorrow".

Since she came to office 18 months ago, she has made repairing damaged relations with the US a top priority.

Emission cuts

The Europeans said they were pleased that the US now officially acknowledged that climate change was happening and that human activity was a major cause of it.

"We agree there's a threat, there's a very serious global threat," said European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso.

"We agree that there is a need to reduce emissions. We agree that we should work together."

But behind the scenes, says our Europe correspondent, officials were saying that not much had changed.

Ms Merkel will try to nudge the US towards a global approach to climate change before a G8 summit Germany is chairing in six weeks' time, says our correspondent.

But the US has consistently rejected the European approach of imposing national limits on greenhouse gas emissions, saying they would harm the international economy.

Visa hope

The Open Skies agreement will take effect on 30 March 2008 and will allow EU carriers to fly to anywhere in the US and vice versa.

The deal promises to lower airfares and widen choice for passengers on both sides of the Atlantic.

The EU hopes to go further and create an "Open Aviation Area" between the two sides "in which investment can flow freely and in which European and US airlines can provide air services without any restriction," said a EU statement.

The EU is also hoping that the US will agree to withdraw its visa requirement for travellers from a number of EU states. http://www.truthabouttrade.org/article.asp?id=7469

This is very very serious, the EU will have a say in our economy. In maybe in much much more. Over time the African and Asian unions will jon. Central Asian union as I call is forming also. Our north american union in truck thing we are trying to stop, is just the start.