Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040

    Fed court lays ground rules in immigrant court case

    Fed court lays ground rules in immigrant court case

    Posted: Sunday, August 31, 2014 5:52 pm
    EMMA PEREZ-TREVIÑO | STAFF WRITER

    Conservative activist Orly Taitz and a U.S. government attorney have their work cut out for them in appearing before a federal judge in Brownsville.

    Taitz, the California attorney and dentist who in court documents filed in Brownsville’s federal court accuses President Barack Obama and others of treason, racketeering and trafficking undocumented immigrants to provide cheap labor for their donors, will have to rein in the rhetoric, and specify her alleged causes of action.

    “This is not a forum to resolve political issues,” U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen said in a hearing last week as he laid out the ground rules for the parties to the lawsuit.

    The hearing was held on Taitz’s request for a temporary restraining order against Obama, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell and the U.S. Border Patrol’s Rio Grande Valley Sector.


    “We’re not here to resolve any kind of immigration crisis, political questions, or border security issues. That’s not why we’re here,” Hanen said.


    The judge also said that no one is to call his chambers for anything, and also referred to a motion that Taitz had filed, but suggested that a courtesy copy that was provided had been longer, and that this would constitute ex-parte communications, which are not permitted.


    Hanen said that the question before the court is if the government has a policy that is directly injuring an individual, does that individual have standing to bring a lawsuit.


    U.S. government attorney Colin A. Kisor argued that the government could not be sued for injunctive relief without a waiver of sovereign immunity, but also that the federal court — Hanen — didn’t have jurisdiction.


    Hanen said he was stunned that Kisor would suggest that if a government program, theoretically, would lead to injuring people, that no one would have a remedy in a court.


    Taitz filed the request for an emergency stay in federal court July 14, seeking to stop Obama, Johnson, Burwell and the U.S. Border Patrol from “dumping” immigrants in other states. She is asking that they be either immediately deported or held in quarantine for two months because, she says, they spread epidemics of scabies, tuberculosis, measles, whooping cough, swine flu, dengue fever, Ebola virus and lice.


    She also alleges that some immigrants who have entered the country illegally pose a threat to national security and safety.


    In her court filings, Taitz referred to an order Hanen entered in December 2013 in an unrelated case, United States of America vs.

    Mirtha Veronica Nava-Martinez, who was convicted of attempting to smuggle a 10-year-old girl from El Salvador.


    Court records show that the girl’s mother Salmeron Santos, an immigrant illegally in the country, admitted that she had hired smugglers to transfer her child from El Salvador to Virginia and paid a $6,000 advance for the service. DHS delivered the child to her mother.


    “This court is quite concerned with the apparent policy of the Department of Homeland Security ... of completing the criminal mission of individuals who are violating the border security of the United States ... The DHS, instead of enforcing our border security laws, actually assisted the criminal conspiracy in achieving its illegal goals,” Hanen wrote in his order.


    At Wednesday’s hearing, Hanen directly and in posing questions to government witnesses voiced similar concerns. The witnesses called were U.S. Border Patrol Chief Kevin Oaks of the Rio Grande Valley Sector in Edinburg, Deputy Field Office Director Alfredo Fierro with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enforcement and Removal Operations, and Teresa M. Brooks, supervisory field program specialist-South Texas, Division of Children’s Services, Office of Refugee Resettlement within the HSS department.


    Hanen said that releasing a child to a sponsor who the government knows also is in the country illegally, and with a criminal record in some cases, and with the expectation that they would appear at an immigration court hearing defied common sense.


    At the end of the approximately four-hour hearing, Hanen denied Taitz’s request for a temporary restraining order, but gave her until Sept. 12 to file an amended complaint. The government’s response would be due Oct. 3. Hanen set an injunction hearing for Oct. 29.


    For the upcoming hearing, Taitz wants to call several Border Patrol agents based in California to testify, and Hanen said that since Taitz also is from California, he had thought that perhaps the case should be transferred to California, but he noted that the allegations had occurred here.

    http://www.themonitor.com/news/local...7a43b2370.html

    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    California Dentist Sues Obama Administration to Stop Transportation of Illegal Aliens

    by Ildefonso Ortiz 1 Nov 2014

    BROWNSVILLE, Texas – The possible spread of Ebola and other diseases has become a focal point in a federal trial where a controversial California dentist is suing the U.S. government in an effort to stop immigration authorities from moving detained aliens out of border areas.

    During a hearing on Tuesday, U.S District Judge Andrew Hannen heard from various witnesses including epidemiologists, border patrol officials, and others on the lawsuit that was originally filed in July by Orly Taitz.

    Following the testimony, Hannen said he would take all the facts into consideration and issue a ruling in the near future.

    The original suit filed by Taitz in July, and obtained by Breitbart Texas, sought to halt the transportation of illegal aliens who carried disease or had criminal records. However, in the most recent amendment to the lawsuit, Taitz added the issue of Ebola citing the current administration negligent response to the threat.

    According to Taitz’s lawsuit President Barack Obama’s administration and his supporters have sought to open the borders in order to bring cheap labor into the country. Taitz claimed that the Obama signed the “Deferred Action for Children Arrivals” knowing that it would act as a magnet for additional immigrants to enter the country illegally thus causing the summer border surge in South Texas.

    That surge brought a series of diseases such as scabies, tuberculosis, and measles. In August, Hannen denied Taitz’s request for an injunction and gave her until September to file an amendment. Taitz did, now mentioning Enterovirus 68 and Ebola while asking not only for the travel injunction but for a travel ban from countries with Ebola.

    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-T...of-Border-Area
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. COURT RULES FOR HOBBY LOBBY IN HHS MANDATE CASE, SUPREME COURT NEXT?
    By Newmexican in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-19-2013, 10:33 PM
  2. Supreme Court Rules Against EPA in Idaho Wetlands Case
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-14-2012, 03:18 PM
  3. High Court Rules Narrowly in Voting Rights Case
    By Texas2step in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-22-2009, 04:53 PM
  4. Sup Court rules against gov in immigration I.D. theft case
    By ShockedinCalifornia in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 05-11-2009, 10:20 PM
  5. High Court Rules Aqainst Bush In Guantanamo Case
    By ruthiela in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-29-2006, 10:43 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •