Thread: Hillary Clinton Just Uttered the DUMBEST Words Ever, and She’s Going to Regret Them

Mad World News

Hillary Clinton Just Uttered the DUMBEST Words Ever, and She’s Going to Regret Them
http://madworldnews.com/hillary-clinton-dumbest-words/
Democrats have no understanding of how the world really works.



Hillary Clinton Just Uttered the DUMBEST Words Ever, and She’s Going to...
People say stupid things, but a lot of the times it’s unintentional, unless you’re a liberal Democrat. Perhaps that’s why Hillary Clinton made one...
madworldnews.com

Hillary Clinton Just Uttered the DUMBEST Words Ever, and She’s Going to Regret Them

in News, Politics / by Sean Brown / on October 25, 2014 at 2:30 pm /
People say stupid things, but a lot of the times it’s unintentional, unless you’re a liberal Democrat. Perhaps that’s why Hillary Clinton made one of the most idiotic statements regarding job creation we’ve likely ever heard.
According to the Washington Free Beacon, while speaking at a Democratic rally in Massachusetts recently, Clinton made a horrible attempt at attacking “trickle-down economics” that resulted in her uttering a ridiculously stupid statement — Corporations and businesses don’t create jobs.
“Don’t let anybody tell you that raising the minimum wage will kill jobs, they always say that,” Clinton began, showing her support for increasing the minimum wage.
That’s how she led into her idiotic suggestion that the very entities that employ people aren’t responsible for the creation of the positions in which people are employed.
“Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs,” she said, before trying to discredit the very economic model that propelled America into having the world’s largest economy.
It’s this type of ideological rhetoric that has caused irreparable damage to our nation. Clinton’s been involved in business her entire life and knows what she said is completely false, yet she’s willing to continue to echo such talking points in order to pander to people who are completely ignorant of how the economy works.
It’s time to clean the cat box in Washington, and we can start by ensuring another Clinton never steps foot in the Oval Office as our commander-in-chief. We can start by sharing this story with everyone we know so they can see the lengths in which she’s willing to go in order to deceive people into voting for her party now and possibly for her in 2016.
Check out the full clip below, courtesy of the Free Beacon, then let us know what you think of her idiotic statement:

- Don’t forget to “like” me on Facebook and follow me on Twitter! -


http://madworldnews.com/hillary-clinton-dumbest-words/

Hillary Clinton: "Don't Let Anybody Tell You Corporations Create Jobs"

HILLARY CLINTON: Don't let anybody tell you that its corporations and businesses that create jobs. You know that old theory, trickle-down economics. That has been tried, that has failed. It has failed rather spectacularly. One of the things my husband says when people ask him what he brought to Washington, he says I brought arithmetic.



http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...eate_jobs.html

Would be nice if someone in media ask Ms. Clinton who does produce jobs, the Democrats just cannot drop the socialism dream, wake up America, freedom vs socialism/communism your choice.

Conservative Daily

Bwa-ha-ha-ha...



Jon Lovitz and the Rest of Twitter Respond to Hillary's 'Businesses Don't Create Jobs' Nonsense
Lovitz and others rightly tee off on an absurd statement from the former SecState and Senator...
ijreview.com|By Michael Hausam

Article and tweets at the page link:

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/10/1924...jobs-nonsense/

Hillary Clinton: Don’t Let Anybody Tell You That It’s Corporations and Businesses That Create Jobs

By Michael Hausam (20 hours ago) | Business, Editor's Choice, Markets, Politics



On Friday at a rally for Martha Coakley in Boston, Hillary Clinton made a couple of statements that are worth some additional examination. And a bit of mocking along with it. She said:

Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs.
You know, that old theory, trickle-down economics, that has been tried, that has failed. It has failed rather spectacularly.
You know, one of the things my husband says when people say ‘Well, what did you bring to Washington?’ he said, ‘Well, I brought arithmetic.”

First of all, and most obviously, if business don’t create jobs, who does? Unfortunately, she didn’t give an answer to that question, but presumably her answer would include some sort of reference to governmental influence or activity.
But let’s take a look at public versus private sector job creation in the United States. First, let’s look at the volume of public sector jobs and their creation:





As we can see, the government’s share of job creation in the United States is paltry: we’re talking somewhere between 1 and 2 million by president, if any at all.
Private job creation, on the other hand, is more on the order of tens of millions potentially, depending on if America has a president who “gets it”:






If Americans ever wants to have a president who “gets it” in the Oval Office again, they would be well-advised to keep a close eye on Hillary Clinton’s statements for further anti-business hostility.
This could very well be Hillary Clinton’s “you didn’t build that” moment, and Americans should take that as being forewarned that another four years of Obamanomics could be right around the corner.

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/10/1923...s-create-jobs/

The Townhall.com Presidential Straw Poll

Is this the next "you didn't build that"?

The Insanity of Hillarynomics: The Ridiculous Comments On Job Creation Every Voter Should See
hotair.com

Hillarynomics: Businesses don’t create jobs

posted at 10:01 am on October 25, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

If you have a job right now, don’t thank the company that hired you or the investors that created the company. According to Hillary Clinton, they didn’t build that. At first arguing that hiking the minimum wage would not cost jobs, the presumed Democratic presidential frontrunner then extended those thoughts in a very peculiar way:

At a Democratic rally in Massachusetts, Hillary Clinton’s attempt to attack “trickle-down economics,” resulted in a spectacularly odd statement. …
She went on to state that businesses and corporations are not the job creators of America. “Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs,” the former Secretary of State said.

It’s actually a total non-sequitur. “Trickle-down economics” has to do with expanding investment, which actually worked spectacularly in the 1980s, but it’s not a theory on which the entire concept of job creation relies. One can criticize “trickle-down economics” without offering the entirely vapid argument that corporations and businesses don’t create jobs. They don’t get created by book tours, after all. The tens of millions that Hillary Clinton collects from publishers and speeches pay for a handful of staff jobs at the Clinton Foundation, perhaps, but that same cash turned into investment would create jobs that actually produce goods and services in a market, which then create secondary jobs, and so on.
Besides, Hillary’s argument here is entirely divorced from reality and actual data. The miminum-wage bill for which Hillary Clinton voted passed in 2007 and took effect in stages, beginning that summer. In June 2007, the Household Survey of the BLS showed that the US economy had 146.063 million jobs in June 2007, just before the increase took place. Last month’s data showed that the US economy had 146.6 million jobs — an increase of less than 500,000 in over 7 years, not “millions of jobs” as Hillary claims here. In fact, the 146.6 million is the highest it’s ever gotten since the passage of that law. In the same period, the civilian workforce participation rate has gone from 66% to 62.7%. On a population basis, there are a lot fewer people working after the last minimum wage hike, not more, and wages are actually down, not up.
Compare this to the “trickle-down” era of the Reagan presidency. When Reagan took office in January 1981, the US economy had 99.995 million jobs and the participation rate was 63.9%. By the end of his presidency in January 1989, the US economy had grown more than 16 million jobs (116.708 million total) and the participation rate had leaped to 66.5%. That covers nearly the same length of time since the last minimum wage hike (96 months vs 89 months), but both include about five years of technical economic recovery.
Obviously there were other factors in play here, so lets focus on something more directly affected by minimum-wage hikes — teen unemployment, which is where minimum-wage hikes have the most impact. When Reagan took office, teen unemployment was 19.1%, but it dropped to 16.4% by the end of his presidency. In June 2007, it was at a similar level, 16.3%. Today it’s 20%, and has been bouncing in 2014 between 19% and 21%. Don’t forget that these figures are more than five years into a supposed recovery.
It’s not easy to get economics this wrong in such a short space of time. At some point, Democrats are going to have to come to grips with the fact that their front-runner is not just a lousy campaigner, but perhaps just as incompetent as the President from which they’re all attempting to run away at the moment.

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/10/2...campaign=straw

Rush Limbaugh

Even Karl Marx knew who created jobs. He just hated them. But even Karl freaking Marx knew who created jobs. Saul Alinsky knew. That's why he hated 'em. Saul Alinsky knew who created jobs. But the Clintons are out there now with a new one. The job creators are actually not the job creators.



Clinton Shifts Left: “Don’t Let Anybody Tell You” That “Businesses Create Jobs”
Clinton Shifts Left: “Don’t Let Anybody Tell You” That “Businesses Create Jobs” (October 24, 2014)
youtube.com



Clinton Shifts Left: “Don’t Let Anybody Tell You” That “Businesses Create Jobs”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyUoCiWsTfI

Monday, 27 Oct 2014 03:37 PM
By Bill Hoffmann

Hillary Clinton is attempting to transform herself into Sen. Elizabeth Warren in a bid to bolster her Democratic base of support in the 2016 presidential race, says Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee.

"If you look at what she's trying to emulate, she's trying to be Elizabeth Warren. It's pretty obvious, and she's trying really hard," Priebus said Monday on "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.

The outspoken GOP leader tore into remarks made by Clinton at a Democratic rally in Massachusetts, in which the former secretary of state defended raising the minimum wage.

"Don't let anybody tell you that raising the minimum wage will kill jobs. They always say that,'' Clinton said. "Don't let anybody tell you that it's corporations and businesses that create jobs."

"She's trying too hard, and she's not really good at this stuff . . . She is bordering on becoming a caricature of someone from the outside looking in," Priebus said.
Special: The One Thing You Should Do for Your Prostate Every Morning

"I don't know if she was a little off script on that particular moment, but it clearly wasn't natural and it was certainly awkward. If it was serious, then she doesn't understand capitalism and democracy in a way that business and jobs operate."

Priebus said Clinton is showing more and more that she's "not that good" in politics.

"If she was smart, which I know she is, but if she was careful politically, what she should be doing is she should say it's not just one guy in the corner office that creates the jobs, it's a whole team of people that work hard every day, punch a clock, go to work and make this place tick," he said.

"I get that message, I understand that message, but the way she did it just honestly shows that she is not ready for prime time."

Priebus said Clinton's national press tour for her memoir "Hard Choices" earlier this year was a key example.

"If you look at her book rollout, it was a disaster. She talks off the cuff, it doesn't work. She makes one mistake after the next."

That's why, Priebus said, Clinton is the perfect Democratic candidate from a Republican point of view.

"Put yourself in my shoes, and your job was you need to raise a lot of money, recruit a lot of volunteers and unify the Republican Party, and there's a lot of opinion within our party . . . You'd want nothing more than Hillary Clinton to be the nominee of the Democrat Party," he said.

"I'm telling you it's not just something that I say to make people chuckle, it's the truth. There'd be no one you would want more to run against than Hillary Clinton."

Priebus said that Warren, of Massachusetts, who is considered the closest Democratic competition to Clinton, is now "the hottest commodity" within the party.

"She's the person that all of these candidates want to be with. Hillary Clinton is a large figure politically in our system, but she doesn't create the groundswell of enthusiasm in a Democratic side of the vote," he said.

"There's something that the Democrats are lacking right now, it's enthusiasm," Priebus said.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/Re.../27/id/603374/