Thread: How Bush Has Trashed U.S. Sovereignty

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How Bush has trashed U.S. sovereignty
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The latest escapade of our "faithful" president as he defends a convicted illegal alien rapist-torturer-murderer using international court legal precedent is just one more example of Bush's treasonous bent on destroying this nation.

What are the key elements that define a nation?


Physical boundaries that define a nation (geographical sovereignty) – We have been witnessing Bush's ongoing attempt and determination to erase our national borders.

Fiscal, economic or monetary sovereignty – We have been hearing about Bush's orchestration of the coming "regional currency" that will replace the U.S. dollar with the amero and thereby destroy U.S. fiscal sovereignty.

Social or cultural identity, and the related value ethic – We have seen Bush refuse to close our borders for at least six years, intentionally allowing other non-U.S. aliens to bring their values (or lack of values) into our nation and cause what is quickly becoming a cultural chaos with the eradication of our Judeo-Christian values in certain states or communities in the country – all with Dubya's blessing.

Political sovereignty – Through the SPP/NAU plans that Bush, Fox and Martin all trilaterally agreed to, our own president Bush has openly made himself complicit in the planned dissolving of our political sovereignty as the United States ceases to be a sovereign nation and simply becomes a regional republic of sorts, controlled by a world government.

Legal sovereignty – And now we are seeing our own president's attempt to butcher our legal system by subjugating Texas and U.S. law to either Mexican or international law – all in the name of compassionate justice, I'm sure!
The Democratically controlled Congress (with a few exceptions) is totally in support of Bush's incrementalist schemes to bring this country down and bring about the One World [socialist] Order.

As far as I'm concerned, president Bush makes Clinton's political treason and scandal look like the driven snow.

God help us if America doesn't vote Ron Paul into office as one who vows to restore our country's constitutional government and clean up the globalist mess of the past few administrations.

Eric Embertson




http://www.worldnetdaily.com/letters.asp

Bush has himself in a real bind here.

Treaties are made with a two thirds vote of the Congress. That is the case with Geneva Convention. However, when King George got in the wringer over prisoners and torture, he held that the GC doesn't bind us. We are sovereign. He likely exceeded his authority on that. There are folks out there that want Bush brought on charges of war crimes. He could hang.

Trying to appease Mexico, Bush came out with saying we are bound by GC. We are not sovereign. That would seem to be true since Congress did vote by 2/3 on GC. Now King George is saying we won't go the way Mexico wants. We're sovereign again. Somebody(Gonzales?) told him he was going to hang.

Will the Supreme Court declare itself irrelevant to keep Bush from war crimes charges? It's going to be interesting.

Originally Posted by loservillelabor

Bush has himself in a real bind here.

Treaties are made with a two thirds vote of the Congress. That is the case with Geneva Convention. However, when King George got in the wringer over prisoners and torture, he held that the GC doesn't bind us. We are sovereign. He likely exceeded his authority on that. There are folks out there that want Bush brought on charges of war crimes. He could hang.

Trying to appease Mexico, Bush came out with saying we are bound by GC. We are not sovereign. That would seem to be true since Congress did vote by 2/3 on GC. Now King George is saying we won't go the way Mexico wants. We're sovereign again. Somebody(Gonzales?) told him he was going to hang.

Will the Supreme Court declare itself irrelevant to keep Bush from war crimes charges? It's going to be interesting.

In a land where free speech is supposed to be guaranteed, Is there anybody else here that holds back their thoughts on this administration?

Originally Posted by cayla99

In a land where free speech is supposed to be guaranteed, Is there anybody else here that holds back their thoughts on this administration?

Oh, yes.

Is there anybody else here that holds back their thoughts on this administration?

Cayla, sometimes I do hold back on what I think or want to say, and I pretty much always try to word myself carefully, but yesterday and today I've been pretty outspoken about how I feel about GWB regarding illegal immigration without holding back.

However, I've always thought that he is pretty good about respecting our freedom of speech, that much I'll give him. That doesn't always alleviate my fears though. I hope he doesn't change on that.

But Hellary!! Do you think she will be able to stand the heat that comes from American's freedom of speech?!!!

Oh my gosh, I predict she will NOT be able to handle it IF she were to be president. I BET you anything stories will be flying about what can happen to you if you're too "free" with what you say about "President Hellary"!!

We would be walking on egg shells IF she were president!!

When I first started speaking out I was petrified, quite honestly. But over time I came to see that we are allowed to state our opinions, and I've even heard President Bush say that he believes strongly in our right to express our opinions. (He said it once regarding Cindy Sheehan).

So now I'm not nearly as afraid as I was in the beginning. However, I do refrain from saying real blatant things or calling him names, etc. (although yesterday on a rare occasion I did call him a "moron". )

But overall, I try to express what I believe in the most respectful way that I can. My main goal is to try to "convince them or President Bush" to see and understand just how much we need their action on this. 95% of the time I do refer to him as "Pesident Bush". I just think that what is happening to our country regarding illegal immigration and the lack of enforcement of our laws is just too important to stay quiet.

So that's where I stand regarding being afraid. I hope it makes sense.

Over time I think we've all come to trust President Bush on this one thing at least.....freedom of speech.

I'll tell you who I'm NOT afraid of....vicente fox and felipe calderon! I am NOT afraid of them. I never have been and I never will be!

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

Over time I think we've all come to trust President Bush on this one thing at least.....freedom of speech.

I'll tell you who I'm NOT afraid of....vicente fox and felipe calderon! I am NOT afraid of them. I never have been and I never will be!

I agree with that and with what you said about hitlery. That being said, I sometimes think that I will be told by airport security that I can not fly because I have said something that offended himself.

Everything he touches turns to crap