Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree4Likes
  • 2 Post By Judy
  • 2 Post By Scott-in-FL

Thread: How does Trump get to 270?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member lorrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Redondo Beach, California
    Posts
    6,765

    How does Trump get to 270?

    October 27, 2016, 05:22 pm

    How does Trump get to 270?




    Donald Trump has a realistic, if difficult, path to 265 electoral votes. It’s getting to 270 that looks improbable.

    Trump is in a tight race with Hillary Clinton in Florida and Ohio, the two swing states that are perennial battlegrounds in the White House race.

    If he wins both, plus the rest of the states won by 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney, he would have 253 electoral votes.That won’t be easy.

    The most difficult battles for Trump to reach even that threshold are in North Carolina and Florida. In both states, a majority of polls show Trump trailing.

    North Carolina, especially, is a difficult target for Trump this year, and one Clinton is focused on putting in her column.

    Still, neither candidate can count on a victory there yet.

    It Trump wins all of those states, plus Iowa and Nevada, both won by President Obama in 2012, he would reach 265 electoral votes.

    Winning Iowa and Nevada wouldn’t be a huge stretch for Trump. In fact, both are probably easier targets for him to hit than either North Carolina or Florida.
    Trump has been ahead in Iowa for much of the presidential race, and he and Clinton are in a dead heat in Nevada.

    But even if Trump pulled out wins in all four of those states, he would be five votes short of 270, the magic number needed to win the presidency.

    Trump also has to make sure his lead doesn’t erode with losses in Arizona, Georgia or Utah. All three of those states have been safe for Republicans, but all are battlegrounds this year. A loss in any of the three would doom Trump.

    Charlie Cook, one of the most respected election analysts in the country, is so certain of a Trump defeat that he says it is a “done deal.”
    The Trump campaign sees 2016 as a “change election,” according to a senior campaign source.

    His team is banking that pollsters are misreading the electorate on a gargantuan scale. They point to the Brexit referendum this June, when polls failed by 4 percentage points to predict that Britain would vote to exit the European Union.

    “Path very well defined,” the campaign source added, laying out the target states detailed above. “Not about strategy now, only execution.”

    Trump’s strategists privately accept he’s behind, despite their bullish rhetoric. But they insist they still believe he’ll win. And that’s what they’re telling the boss when he asks.

    If Trump can win Nevada and get to 265, the Republican’s strategists hope he can pick up one vote in Maine’s second congressional district.

    Maine doles out two electoral votes to the statewide winner and then one each to the winners of a liberal congressional district and a conservative one, meaning Trump can add one to his score by winning in the rural parts of the state.

    That would get Trump to 266 electoral votes — still four short of a win.

    Trump's strategists are targeting some combination of states where Clinton is seen as the favorite to get them over the top. These states include New
    Hampshire, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Wins in more than one of these states could also offset a loss somewhere else.

    On paper, New Hampshire seems like the best bet for Trump.

    He cruised to a victory in the state’s primary, and voters there backed President George W. Bush for president in 2004. The state’s primarily white population resembles other states where Trump has been strong.

    Yet Trump is behind Clinton in the RealClearPolitics average of polls in New Hampshire by 6.5 percentage points. The Republican has done poorly with college-educated voters, who make up a higher proportion of the electorate in New Hampshire than Ohio. It’s one reason why Trump could be having more trouble there.

    Pennsylvania has long been a target of the Trump campaign and previous GOP presidential candidates. Like Michigan, it hasn’t voted for a GOP candidate in a presidential election since 1988.

    Clinton so far has had a durable lead in the Keystone State, suggesting Trump is unlikely to break this pattern.

    Trump has also been consistently behind Clinton in Michigan and Wisconsin, which hasn’t voted for a Republican candidate for president since 1984.

    Monmouth University pollster Patrick Murray described Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin as “almost completely off the map” for Trump, pointing to long-standing Clinton leads in all three states.

    The last two GOP presidential candidates hoped to win Virginia — where Obama broke a losing streak for Democrats in 2008. Yet Trump has all but given up on Virginia, where Clinton has a 7.2-point lead in the RealClearPolitics average.

    Two senior sources in Trump’s operation confirmed the Trump campaign puts Virginia in a “maybe column” with targets such as Minnesota, New Mexico and Washington. Minnesota and Wisconsin, at least, would be longer shots for any Republican presidential nominee.

    “It's a heavy lift,” the senior campaign source acknowledged, before arguing that Clinton also faces a difficult path to 270.

    “But it is for her also. They are just as nervous because she is not a closer.

    “And we have the best closer in the world,” the source added. “And she wants to take a nap.”

    In reality, however, Trump has the much tougher path to 270, assuming polls are reasonably accurate.

    In fact, Liam Donovan, a former aide to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, argues a Trump win would depend on a “huge systemic failure.”

    “Trump isn't going to thread the needle,” he said. “If he wins, it's because everything we know is wrong.”

    If everything pollsters are doing is wrong, Donovan said, it’s possible a whole host of states could go to Trump. But that’s not to say he’s arguing that possibility is likely.

    “For instance, Pennsylvania doesn't flip without a uniform swing that would bring Colorado and Nevada and Wisconsin and New Hampshire with it,” he said. “So it seems like boom or bust from my standpoint, with almost metaphysical certitude on bust.”

    http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...ump-get-to-270

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,660
    I think people need to focus on voting, voting for their country, our borders, our trade, our jobs, and improvements in education, health care, military, infrastructure, incomes, inner cities, rural America and peace. If Americans do that, regardless of what state they live in, they will vote for Donald Trump.

    Some say this is a "referendum" on Trump. Others say this is a "referendum on Hillary.

    This election is actually a "referendum" on the people of the United States. Either we are a nation that will defend our nation and citizens, or we're not. If we are still The Americans dedicated to our country and fellow citizens, then Trump will win. If we have already lost our nation and sold out our citizens, then Hillary will win.

    I still believe in the American People, so I believe Trump will win.

    You know since it's World Series time, I wanted to mention something. It's illegal to bet on games when you're a player. Right? And that is to protect the integrity of the game, same with all sports.

    Yet, we allow our politicians and media personnel to bet on our elections. They brag about it, they talk about it, they write about it, they play it up as if this is some fun game to them. If you've bet money on an election, how will you report the news about that election? If you've bet money on an election, how will you choose your endorsements as a politician?

    Election betting should be banned. It should be illegal. How could something as obvious as this not be mentioned or criticized in this election by anyone so far except me??!!!

    Wake Up America! You're being sold out in every possible way. You don't even have the basic fundamental legal protections that you'd have at a baseball game.

    CLEAN IT UP!!

    DRAIN THE SWAMP!!

    VOTE TRUMP!!!!
    posylady and Beezer like this.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    265
    What's it with college educated not going for Trump? White collar jobs are not safe and have been disappearing. Don't they perceive some type of threat with Hillary's policies, such as increased immigration and her fondness for outsourcing companies. I don't get it.

    Most people I talk to or someone else tells me about are voting for Trump. There was only one female Hillary supporter.

    I hope with all my heart, that Trump wins.
    Judy and Beezer like this.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,660
    I'm college educated and I'm ALL IN for Trump and have been since he announced. So I don't get the "college educated" not voting for Trump, I suspect it's a BIG LIE. I think they choose those pollees based on whether they're members of NEA perhaps??!! NEA members who are "college educated" are opposed to Trump. I read yesterday that 96% of US Department of Justice is opposed to Trump so maybe they're trolling those people or they're polling media employees, 96% of them are opposed to Trump.

    As a college educated person it makes no sense to me that college educated would be against Trump. I mean i don't understand how any American Citizen can be against Trump. Maybe people are lying in their interviews and telling the polling companies they have college degrees when they really don't. When the polls are rigged by the media reporting the news, anything is possible if not probable.

    It's a sad time in our country to see institutions that we always supported with our money and hearts are actually traitors betraying our trust.
    Last edited by Judy; 10-28-2016 at 02:39 AM.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. Latinos for Trump Founder: Media Ignoring Trump’s Immigration Plan, ‘Going Nuts’ Over
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-02-2016, 04:20 PM
  2. Trump’s New Campaign Manager Will Let Trump Be Trump
    By Judy in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-19-2016, 08:10 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-21-2016, 04:39 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-26-2016, 10:16 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-31-2015, 03:07 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •