Thread: HUNTER WINS NEVADA REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY ENDORSEMENT

Originally Posted by usanevada

Because it carries very little weight

Nevada will go Romney ,

At least thats what a conglomerate of polls say

Of course the polls got it wrong for Obama a couple days ago

Little by little the polls mean nothing more and more. Last night a poll taker even said this.

Sippy wrote:

This is sweet! I'll bet MW is doing flips around the house right now!

Nope, I'm still furious that he has been eliminated from the SC debate!

usanevada wrote:

Because it carries very little weight

Nevada will go Romney ,

At least thats what a conglomerate of polls say

Of course the polls got it wrong for Obama a couple days ago

We know you're have a love relationship with Romney, however, that is no reason to cut on Hunter simply because he received an endorsement that you felt should have went to your fair haired boy.

Hunter has a strong message that resonates, even if you fail to recognize it.

Originally Posted by Balboa

Originally Posted by usanevada

Because it carries very little weight

Nevada will go Romney ,

At least thats what a conglomerate of polls say

Of course the polls got it wrong for Obama a couple days ago

Little by little the polls mean nothing more and more. Last night a poll taker even said this.

Yes, but it also comes to a point where you need to be "realistic" as well----which is why Tom Tancredo withdrew when he did!!

Originally Posted by MW

Sippy wrote:

This is sweet! I'll bet MW is doing flips around the house right now!

Nope, I'm still furious that he has been eliminated from the SC debate!

usanevada wrote:

[quote:3c0at4bp]Because it carries very little weight

Nevada will go Romney ,

At least thats what a conglomerate of polls say

Of course the polls got it wrong for Obama a couple days ago

We know you're have a love relationship with Romney, however, that is no reason to cut on Hunter simply because he received an endorsement that you felt should have went to your fair haired boy. [/quote:3c0at4bp]

At this point it doesn't really matter

The media boys of choice are Huck and McCain

So neither of us is going to win this one

I really do like Hunter though , weather you believe it or not

Bren wrote:

Yes, but it also comes to a point where you need to be "realistic" as well----which is why Tom Tancredo withdrew when he did!!

Why do you Romney folks insist on polluting every Hunter thread? Heck, I don't care much for Ron Paul, but at least I'm selective in the threads I jump in.

I won't speak to why Tancredo dropped out (he was my 2nd choice), however, you need to realize that Hunter has more fight in him than Tancredo did. Hunter actually thinks he can win and has thought that ever since jumping in the race. Not to take anything from Tancredo, but it is no secret that he publicly announced that he was mainly in the race to bring attention to immigration, not necessarily for the win.

usanevada wrote:

At this point it doesn't really matter

The media boys of choice are Huck and McCain

So neither of us is going to win this one

Speak for yourself. I won't give up until Hunter has announced a withdrawal or is sitting in the White House.

Look, I know the odds are extremely long (close to impossible) but I'm not giving up. If you feel as strongly about Romney as I do Hunter, you won't either.

Originally Posted by Bren4824

Originally Posted by Balboa

Originally Posted by usanevada

Because it carries very little weight

Nevada will go Romney ,

At least thats what a conglomerate of polls say

Of course the polls got it wrong for Obama a couple days ago

Little by little the polls mean nothing more and more. Last night a poll taker even said this.

Yes, but it also comes to a point where you need to be "realistic" as well----which is why Tom Tancredo withdrew when he did!!

And??!!

The Nevada Republican Assembly held a Presidential Endorsing Convention on Sunday Jan 6, 2008, choosing Congressman Duncan Hunter with their endorsement.

Unlike the media, obviously the Nevada Republican Assembly still thinks Duncan Hunter is a viable candidate. They wouldn't have endorsed him if they thought otherwise.

Once again, Hunter is my #2, but this is great news.

It means the media didn't control this - that's really great news.

I, too, I still angered they are excluding him from SC. They have no right to exclude anyone this early in the game. They are silencing a message they don't want out.

Also, if we end up having someone the media likes as a Rep candidate, it won't matter - we could close our eyes as we will be voting for The Agenda.

nntrixie wrote:

I, too, I still angered they are excluding him from SC. They have no right to exclude anyone this early in the game. They are silencing a message they don't want out.

You're right, and it's not only the immigration they're attempting silence. MSM and the CFR basically support and encourage the same agenda. It's also Hunter's position against the China trade deal, NAFTA, CAFTA, and the WTO that has them concerned.