Thread: La raza endorses McCain~ sort of

Here's MY comment...

Our immigration system is NOT broken, the laws that we have had for the last 12 years have simply gone unenforced while Corporate America has lined their pockets at the expense of the American worker. It’s a lot cheaper to pay an illegal half of what an American would get and then sluff off their benefits on the taxpayer.

The facts are clear, and the reprehensible position of NCLR, ADL and SPLC in making this issue about ethnicity when the true issue is sovereignty is indefensible.

Illegal alien is a LEGAL TERM, not ‘hate speech’, and a conversation about illegal aliens and their adverse effects on this nation and it’s citizens is LONG overdue. Do you think we can have that conversation without all your liberal PC getting in the way?

I doubt it…

— Posted by Guy Pinestra

The story is not about bigotry or illegal immigration or open borders. This story is about the first amendment. Ms. Murguia believes that political correctness is more important than the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution. Political correctness is a tool of suppression of debate. She is complaining about the speech of people paid to give their opinions, but these people, and all other people in this country, have a constitutional right to hold and express their opinions, even if they offend all (supposedly) right thinking people in this country.

These are the same arguments advanced in the Ezra Levant case in Canada and they are as specious here as there. If you do not like what someone is saying, turn off the television or persuade them to change their opinion, but do not try to shut them up. You do not have the right to do so. I find it ironic that the head of a civil rights organization believes that depriving others of their civil rights is in any way acceptable.

— Posted by M Christian

This was a great post!

Originally Posted by Mayday

The story is not about bigotry or illegal immigration or open borders. This story is about the first amendment. Ms. Murguia believes that political correctness is more important than the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution. Political correctness is a tool of suppression of debate. She is complaining about the speech of people paid to give their opinions, but these people, and all other people in this country, have a constitutional right to hold and express their opinions, even if they offend all (supposedly) right thinking people in this country.

These are the same arguments advanced in the Ezra Levant case in Canada and they are as specious here as there. If you do not like what someone is saying, turn off the television or persuade them to change their opinion, but do not try to shut them up. You do not have the right to do so. I find it ironic that the head of a civil rights organization believes that depriving others of their civil rights is in any way acceptable.

— Posted by M Christian

This was a great post!

Thats because Ms. Murguia, is like Juan Hernandez , she is the head of a radical racist group (The Race ) who puts her race above the good of the country, the constitution, the rule of Law and America's sovereignty, she puts Mexico first before her own country....that is if she was even born in the United States of America one has to wonder.

la Raza is an openly racist group that spews hate speech against other races on a daily basis.