Thread: Lamar Smith's misguided view on immigration

There's a guy who runs for president every four years who has he same gift for mixing fact with fiction. His "campaigning" consists of TV addresses which resemble infomercials. Can't think of his name. Does anybody know?

EDIT: Never mind, it's Lyndon LaRouche.

Originally Posted by escalade

Quote: "WHO THE HELL CARES ABOUT "LATINO" VOTERS"

No one but the politicians running for office that mistakenly think it will secure their vote.

Soon, it is not going to matter whether you are a republican or democrat, as to having a choice as to who you are going to vote for to stop the rape of this country. If you are a direct recipient of losing your job to an illegal alien, you or your loved one or friends are a victim of identify theft by an illegal, a drunk illegal wrecking your car or worse yet killing someone you care about, waiting in the ER with a real emergency, garbage neighborhoods, putting up with routine rudeness in a WalMart by illegals, crowding, shoving, blocking aisles.....the list goes on.

I would bet that all the posters on Alipac are not republicans. They are just simply Americans who want their country restored to some form of civility, fairness and want to coexist with people who love it as much as they do. They do not want their already existing laws compromised....they want them obeyed, and most feel they should not have to march in the streets to have that happen. I will not sell them short......anyone who is a victim of this criminal lawlessness that is being tolerated by this adminstration is going to vote for people who will get it under control....once and for all Fence sitters, sympathizers and pacifists on this issue will not be elected....and that includes RINOS

.

Haven't we made that clear enough (and many times over) within the 8 mo's you've been with ALIPAC ?
I mean.....come on....

Believe Rep. Smith is referring to the article above but may have been posted at different sources with different titles.

~~~


Facts, not insults, on immigration

By Lamar Smith
Ventura County Star
Posted January 4, 2011 at 6:03 p.m.

Re: Ruben Navarrette’s Dec. 30 column, “The high price of bashingâ€

Fact is that 80% of the real American Public want the borders secured, illegals found and deported. What they don't want is DREAM ACT or AMNISTY. The Latino press like the Hispanically Speaking News, constantly flood the Latino community with false ideas that the latino vote nationwide will turn the tide on immigration. Fact is that the more they chant and cry, the more they put the spotlight on places to look for illegals withing our society. DREAM ACT advocates put the spotlight on all these illegal students within our school systems. Start there by pulling out those students. Their own community put the bullseye on them. ICE and local law enforcement need to take advantage and round them up. Sweeps of construction sites and day labor gathering points next. the deportation system needs streemlining also. A one page form would do. Form to have the following...Name Address...Documentation if any.... country of origin...family members here in the USA.... their address....DEPORT yes or no......Judge's signiture and date. 15 minutes and its done. Whats so hard about that?

[quote="stevetheroofer"] alienating an otherwise conservative audience with incendiary rhetoric and bumper sticker slogans.
quote]

Otherwise conservative audience? Huh? So lets get me right.... we want to close the border the conservatives as well that is kind of implied right? So how many of these otherwise "conservative" *latino* voters would support that assuming we still allowed them to stay and get status? Not a single one. They have no interest in closing the border or cutting big government.... its what they breed on. Theres no conservative there, end of story.

Then he goes on to replenshing the American Workforce? I musta missed the note where we were at 0% unemployment because last I saw it was still near 10%. But under the assumption he's wrong and we're still at 10% unemployment.... how would adding 10's of million illegals into the system legally replenish anything rather then create more of a drain? What about these open borders? Wouldn't that create more as well?

The ONLY way to actually use the hispanic workforce to benefit the US in ANY tiny possible way was if we could literally pay them slave wages w/o benefits to bring back manufacturing jobs which would bring back more middle wage jobs as well for the rest. Of course it wouldn't fly inside the US us denying them any social benefits and then paying $5-6 an hour w/o health insurance... noone would fly for that. Of course they would have to get normal American wages and the Unions would step in to make sure they got even more.

There is NO benefit available to keep illegals inside the US or their spawn. deport them all and then lets have a vote to see what Americans think. If we spend this entire next year not doing anything besides removing illegals, securing the border, and denying work and any benefit to them I'm fairly sure with Reps leading that in 2012 a Rep president, senate, house would be a shoe in when people see unemployment drop down to under 6%, see budgets in states getting balanced, and see the federal budget gap close significantly. Hell, even healthcare costs would start on the decline I believe.

Added Rep. Lamar Smith's article to the homepage:
http://www.alipac.us/article-5980--0-0.html

This idiot has been saying this for years...........

Music to my ears, the illegal alien latino is on the endangered species list working illegally in the work force. Mr Smith is in the house! I am so damn angry about the president and his dumacrats favoring illegals over Americans. It is a 100 percent losing strategy that is only alienating American voters.

Immigration enforcement is the way to proceed. We cannot simply continue to allow 1 million illegals to trespass our borders every year. America would be diluted, then dissolved.

One important tool of enforcement that I hope the new Congress addresses soon is how best to fix the 14th Amendment. Not just because it would discourage or prevent 400,000 anchor-babies being born in the US every year. But because these anchor-babies, according to a former Mexican President, should not have any foreign loyalties, but remain loyal to just Mexico.

Frosty Wooldridge wrote an interesting article about how the Mexican Constitution apparently denies US citizenship to anchor-babies born inside the US:

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/337/356/ ... nesty.html

Some interesting paragraphs:

April 4, 1997, President Sedillo of Mexico stated that “We will not tolerate foreign forces dictating and enacting laws on Mexicans. Our contention is that we are not enacting or dictating any laws on the Mexican illegal alien children born by illegal alien females in the US territory. Further, he states that “he was going to use all diplomatic and legal forces at his disposal to….protect Mexicans living in the United States.â€

According to the polling firm Latino Decisions, 71 percent of the votes cast by Latinos in the midterm elections went to Democratic candidates. And with recent census data showing that Hispanics drive population growth in Arizona, Nevada, Texas, Florida and other states, the Republican Party could be capsized by a demographic tidal wave.

Really Rubie? Is that why Dems took a shellacking in this election? 71% of a very small group of ethnocentric voters is nothing compared to a 50-70% of multicultural legal voters. You see the picture now Rubie?