Thread: Laura Ingraham: Huckabee Is A "Big Loser" On Immig

Originally Posted by usanevada

Originally Posted by PinestrawGuys

Originally Posted by usanevada

Hillary only needs one term to grant amnesty , after that there is no way we will ever win an election and overturn the amnesty she will grant

The part you people are not getting is there are 30 million illegals here and they are chaffing to get the vote , they will guarantee a socialist open borders wacko keeps the presidency and they will keep it socialist/dem because the dems will open the floodgates to the 3rd world and YOU will be paying for it

Now by all means "stick to your guns" and support someone with 5% of the total vote

What you're not 'getting' is that a CFR candidate, REGARDLESS of the party they belong to, will do the CFR's BIDDING. You got 2 choices, Hunter or Paul. Period.

I've seen like 35 years of elections and such
Nobody polling 2-5% has a chance , I don't care if you agree with the polls or not
Paul or Hunter won't win period , no matter how much you believe in them

In that case we're pretty much screwed REGARDLESS, aren't we...

Originally Posted by usanevada

I've seen like 35 years of elections and such
Nobody polling 2-5% has a chance , I don't care if you agree with the polls or not
Paul or Hunter won't win period , no matter how much you believe in them

Isn't there something to be said for the 2-5% given to a stray candidate losing the election for one of the top tier candidates? Wouldn't that make them look at the issues that stray candidate is pushing for?

You have to look at it from another angle, said candidate might not win, but he may influence politics with his 2 to 5% votes.

Its a fine line to walk. If I feel that one of the major amnesty players is close to winning in the primaries I will not vote Hunter, if there is room I will. Time will tell.