Thread: Leader Of The Free World?

Originally Posted by thedude

I've heard the president of the US be referred to as the "Leader of the free world" for my whole life. I think it may have started after WWII ... ?

Glad to hear I'm not the only one who recalls this.

I guess no one bothered to read my post......I found the explanation for the "Leader of the Free World" label........but yes, it's been a term used for ages and also has never been used to refer to the US or our President(s) exclusively.

I agree with all of the Above... but he is Neither

Leader of America (or) Leader of the Free World

In stead of a Commander ~n~ Chief

We have a Corrupt Idiot at the Helm

Amen Airbornsapper7. And also to Tinybob you are Right. The head of state,president or whatever one chooses to call him should never let the leader of another country and its government interfere with our government policies or other wise and not say a word about it. Mexico has been doing this and nothing has been said to them about it. It makes me wonder if our government as a whole is afraid to speak up for America,its people and policies. This should never be tolerated by any government of any country. But it is happening here and our elected powers that be tolerate it as if nothing has happened. This just goes to show that our government is WEAK,FEEBLE AND JUST PLAIN DON'T GIVE A D---.

I think Bush really must be the AntiChrist.

He is crazy

I think Ron Paul is leader of the remaining free world, which is getting pretty small.