Thread: Lists of basic links

The basics about illegal aliens and illegal immigration.

http://www.alipac.us

http://www.numbersusa.com

Roy Beck's "gumball" video on overpopulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7WJeqxuOfQ

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... beck&hl=en

http://www.vdare.com

http://www.frostywooldridge.com/

http://www.capsweb.org

Mr. Obama is disqualified for the office of President,
not being a "natural born citizen,"
as required by the U.S. Constitution, Art. II, § 1.

Pat Boone asks, "Where is the Birth Certificate?"
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=102330

"Debunking the Obamatoids" by Lynn Stuter
http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter146.htm

"Obama Presidential Eligibility - An Introductory Primer" by Stephen Tonchen
(Birthers who consider Mr. Obama's birthplace to be of vital importance are not agreed upon Leo Donofrio's view in Section 18.
There is room for both opinions, as Mr. Obama is vulnerable on both flanks. Infighting about which is valid is counter-productive.)
http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

Mario Apuzzo, Esq., attorney for Kerchner v. Obama
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

Philip J. Berg, Esq., attorney for Hollister v. Obama a/k/a Soetoro, Berg v. Obama, and Berg as Relator v. Obama
http://www.obamacrimes.info/

Leo Donofrio, Esq., on natural born citizenship
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., attorney for Keyes v. Obama
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/

"Dr. Ron Polarik" debunks the COLB forgery presented by DailyKos and FactCheck
http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/2008/11/22/obamas_born_conspiracy
_obamas_bogus_birth_certificate_exposed%21.thtml

Pamela Gellar on "Obama's Birth Certificate Forgery"
A few have declared the forensics expert a fraud, but, except for - maybe - one or two details, his analysis is sound.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atla ... usive.html

The ALIPAC thread on Barack Obama's Constitutional ineligibility
http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-137238-.html
This thread includes a summary of reasons why the DailyKos / FactCheck "Certification" is a forgery.
http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-137238-days ... -1403.html

Mr. Obama is disqualified for the office of President,
not being a "natural born citizen,"
as required by the U.S. Constitution, Art. II, § 1.

There has been no proof offered one way or another. Therefore, this really isn't immigration related.

Originally Posted by MW

Mr. Obama is disqualified for the office of President,
not being a "natural born citizen,"
as required by the U.S. Constitution, Art. II, § 1.

There has been no proof offered one way or another. Therefore, this really isn't immigration related.

Although I'll be the first to fight for your right to your opinion, I totally disagree. Any man who spends millions to safeguard his BC from public eyes..any President who disarms all Navy personnel attending the Naval Academy Grad ceremony, thus breaking a 200-year old tradition..

A President in the White House who is not qualified is an imposter and his questionable agenda directly affects illegal immigration. I will say no more.

Rockfish wrote:

A President in the White House who is not qualified is an imposter

Look, I personally find Obama to be a dispicable man, however, my opinion, just like yours, has absolutely no relevance to his qualifications. It's unfortunate, but to date no one has been able to prove, beyond a resonable doubt, that he's not qualified.

Rockfish, where are you getting this information about disarmament and spending millions protecting his BC?

Originally Posted by MW

Rockfish wrote:

A President in the White House who is not qualified is an imposter

Look, I personally find Obama to be a dispicable man, however, my opinion, just like yours, has absolutely no relevance to his qualifications. It's unfortunate, but to date no one has been able to prove, beyond a resonable doubt, that he's not qualified.

I'm with MW on this one. I don't like Obama either, but ALL of the suits brought against him have zero proof. In my opinion, it's mostly sore losers that want Republican control again.

Originally Posted by vortex

Rockfish, where are you getting this information about disarmament and spending millions protecting his BC?

I read it here, but here's link that clears the air. I was fooled like many others out there. Had to look this up since you guys were leary about what I posted. Turns out yer right, I'm wrong..I stand corrected. But sure damn glad this didn't happen. Would have been a lot of mad people in the Navy..

A recent report claiming that graduating midshipmen were told not to wear their ceremonial swords has made the rounds on the internet.

SOF has contacted the Naval Acadaney’s Public Affairs Office, which denied the report.

UPDATE:

The Naval Academy’s press office provided additional comments, reprinted below:

Unfortunately, this article is extremely misleading. Midshipmen are not required to have swords as part of their normal uniform issue unless they are Brigade Officers, and then they are issued temporary swords for parades and other ceremonial events.

Officers may add the sword and wear it at ceremonial events such as change of commands, weddings, etc. as designated. They are not, nor have they ever been worn by Midshipmen at graduation.

Many parents give swords to graduates to be worn with their officer uniform after commissioning, but they along with many other items are routinely banned from being carried into the graduation ceremony for obvious security reasons.

I sincerely hope that this explains the issue.

http://www.sofmag.com/wp/2009/06/the...my-graduation/

By the way, Barack spent hundreds of thousands to keep from having to show his BC, not millions, but who knows for sure. I read it here where he did spend millions, but it is estimated in the six--figures, according to an article that I just read.

Originally Posted by MW

Rockfish wrote:

A President in the White House who is not qualified is an imposter

Look, I personally find Obama to be a dispicable man, however, my opinion, just like yours, has absolutely no relevance to his qualifications. It's unfortunate, but to date no one has been able to prove, beyond a resonable doubt, that he's not qualified.

Yea, as long as the courts find that people suing have no standing..what's that about? It's BS is what it is.