Thread: Media Polling Fully Exposed -About That NBC/ WSJ Clinton +11 Point Poll

Media Polling Fully Exposed – About That NBC/WSJ Clinton +11 Point Poll….

Posted on October 11, 2016 by sundance


The Real Battle, is The Battle For Your Mind

Researchers and political analysts frequent CTH because we bring you hard, factual, and fully cited research enabling you to make up your own mind about the headlines.
What you are about to read (and see) below is a fully cited example of something we have discussed frequently, but withheld until today, so the oppositional forces cannot change strategies in their attempts to manipulate your mind.
It is now time to lay all media polling naked for you to grasp. Everything below is fully cited so you can fact-check it for yourself. However, we present this with a disclaimer: the entities exposed will industriously work to change their approach from this day forth.

You have probably seen the latest example of the media claiming a released presidential poll from NBC and The Wall Street Journal as an example of Hillary Clinton expanding to an 11 point lead in the weekend following the “controversial” leaked tape of Donald Trump.
The claim is complete and utter nonsense. Here’s the proof.


We begin with a google search showing hundreds of media citations referencing the NBC/WSJ Poll:

And here’s the NBC link to the poll, and the NBC Link to the pdf of the poll, and the NBC Poll itself in a scribed pdf:
here’s the NBC link to the poll, and the NBC Link to the pdf of the poll, and the NBC Poll itself in a scribed pdf:

View this document on Scribd
Transparently the poll is manipulated with: a) a small sample (500); and b) the following ideological make-up:



♦ Republican and Republican leaners 36%
♦ Democrat and Democrat leaners 43%
♦ Independents 12%
By itself that ideological snapshot is silly. Nationally the party registration is roughly 27% (R), 32% (D), and 40% (I) – SEE HERE – However, the polling sample is the least of the issues for this deconstruction.
Arguing about the construct or methodology of the poll is typically what most people do when they are refuting a media poll. That aspect alone is not the big story.



Look at the polling organization:

Do you see: Hart Research Associates/Public Opinion Strategies?

Hart Research Associates is headed up by Peter D Hart (founder), and Geoff Garin (President) – SEE HERE
Now look at what role Geoff Garin, Hart Research Associate President, is currently occupying (link here):

OK, so Mr. Geoff Garin, the President of Hart Research and Associates”, is currently working as “a strategic adviser for Priorities USA in support of Hillary Clinton’s election“. Gee, I wonder why the media never tells us that part?


See the issue?
Wait, we’re not even close to finished. It gets better.
Let’s take a look at the recent financial connection between, Geoff Garin, Hart Research Associates and Hillary Clinton’s Priorities USA Super-PAC.
For that information we turn to FEC filings -HERE-. What do they indicate?

On Page #118 of the September 2016 (most recent) filing we find a payment for $178,500(screen grab above)
On Page #92 of the same September 2016 (most recent) filing, we find another payment for $42,000 (screen grab below)

♦ $220,500.00 in the month of September alone paid by Hillary Clinton’s Priorities USA Super-PAC to Hart Research Associates.
♦ The President of Hart Research Associates, Geoff Garin, is working for Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
♦ NBC (S Burke) and The WSJ (Murdoch) contact Geoff Garin (Hart Research Associates) for the post-debate poll data they will use on the day following the debate.
♦ Hart Research Associates provides a small national poll sample (500) result, with skewed party internals, showing Hillary Clinton +11 points.
Do you see now how “media polling” works, and why we advise to ignore it?
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...l/#more-123009

Related:

http://www.alipac.us/f9/trump-looks-...-abyss-338454/

October 11, 2016


The 11-point lead for Hillary in WSJ-NBC poll sure looks like psy-ops



By Thomas Lifson


The NeverTrumps got a huge boost when the first poll out after the infamous bawdy tapes showed an 11 point lead for Hillary a month before the election. That is an insurmountable margin, we have been instructed. And barring a smoking gun Wikileaks revelation (it would have to be something really big, something on the order of video of Hillary biting the heads off kittens), it probably is.


The Mainstream media touted this poll endlessly.



Unless, of course, the poll was pure psy-ops. Which, thanks to some research by Sundance of Conservative Treehouse, it now strongly resembles. The poll was the product of Hart Research Associates/Public Opinion Strategies, which it just so happens, is headed by


Mr. Geoff Garin, [who is] the President of Hart Research and Associates”, [and] is currently working as “a strategic adviser for Priorities USA in support of Hillary Clinton’s election“. But, as Sundance writes, “it gets better.”

Let’s take a look at the recent financial connection between, Geoff Garin, Hart Research Associates and Hillary Clinton’s Priorities USA Super-PAC.
For that information we turn to FEC filings -HERE-. What do they indicate?

On Page #118 of the September 2016 (most recent) filing we find a payment for $178,500 (screen grab above)
On Page #92 of the same September 2016 (most recent) filing, we find another payment for $42,000 (screen grab below)

♦ $220,500.00 in the month of September alone paid by Hillary Clinton’s Priorities USA Super-PAC to Hart Research Associates.
♦ The President of Hart Research Associates, Geoff Garin, is working for Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
♦ NBC (S Burke) and The WSJ (Murdoch) contact Geoff Garin (Hart Research Associates) for the post-debate poll data they will use on the day following the debate.
♦ Hart Research Associates provides a small national poll sample (500) result, with skewed party internals, showing Hillary Clinton +11 points.

Having lived through the pre-election polling showing Romney had a chance to beat Obama, I hesitate to charge pollsters in general with bias toward Democrats. That said, polling is the product of the Infotainment industry, which overwhelmingly backs the Democrats. And this poll, produced by a propaganda outfit, stinks.


http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...ke_psyops.html

Excellent finds GeorgiaPeach....thank you.