[QUOTEBefore we panic, we should stop and think this could all be a setup to start riots between blacks and whites, Obama supporters and Romney supporters. Who would benefit? Let's be cautious while being prepared. ][/QUOTE]

I agree. I also believe it more hype than substance:

1. Obama grassroots support this year is nothing like 20008. Early voting in Ohio ( I heard on Laura Ingrahmam last week) was about half of 2008, with only a 4 per cent difference between Dems and GOP vice double digit difference in 2008. Indicates low turnout, not to mention Romney's surges in most swing states, among women, and even in California.
2. Conservative black ministers are telling their congregations that Obama is not supporting their core principles, especially with regard to homosexual marriage and abortion.
3. My opinion of the riots in LA, Watts, etc is that they were as much a looting opportunity as they were a method of expressing dissatisfaction with social conditions. Those conditions may have been the spark, but I think the 'all you can carry' syndrome provided the flames.
4. If Obama loses, and I believe he will, then there will be some to try seize the situation to try and justify riots, but I believe most of it will be in the form of flash mobs and will be limited to a relatively small number of urban areas.
5.None of this makes the situation good, but I think it is a more accurate perspective in that there should be no nationwide panic.
6. One thing this all does prove is that Obama does not care about uniting the country or he would be taking affirmative action to quell the spread of riot fever.