Thread: MSNBC Is Bush Relevant Can He Recover

whether there has been a legitimate sea change.

How I wish that could be true. And how I wish you didn't feel the need to add the "Im not holding my breath part".

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

whether there has been a legitimate sea change.

How I wish that could be true. And how I wish you didn't feel the need to add the "Im not holding my breath part".

Once bitten, twice shy...

I have only a few more questions and then I'll be finished. Thank you.

#1. Is Dick Cheney getting pulled into the Scooter Libby case?

#2. If President Bush had to pick another VP who do you think that would be?

#3. Could most all of this NAU and the massive illegal immigration be coming at the "command" of the VP and some other hidden forces?

#4. Is there any chance that President Bush is or has been being coerced to do as he has done regarding the borders?

#5. I keep getting the feeling that although he has gone along with all of this obviously, that there seems to be a few times that I have sensed or thought that he is not totally for all of this....as though he could switch gears on this open borders and amnesty scheme. (Again, I have heard at least one person say that they have also had that thought or sense a few times themself). What do you think about that?

End of LegalUSCitizen's Questionaire. I'm just searching for answers to many questions that I have tonight. Thank you.

Oops!! One more!!

#6. If he is being coerced, could, would or does he possibly have the ability to fight back? In other words, if he is being coerced, is there any hope for us?

one more???? Little bitty one....

7. Who and where might these hidden rulers be??

Done and thank you again.

The NACC is a group that is put into power to make sure the NAU is done. So the president is more or less a governer of a state of the NAU. He can't really get out of it now. Also I feel that he is trying to crack down on the illigals to clean it up...Same as Mexico, once done so, then it will be easlier to merge the countries. NO I don't think Chaney has anything to do with it. But any leader that we elect most likely gets a talken to.

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

I have only a few more questions and then I'll be finished. Thank you.

#1. Is Dick Cheney getting pulled into the Scooter Libby case?

Probably not in any meaningful way, but who knows?

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

#2. If President Bush had to pick another VP who do you think that would be?

I'd say Condoleeza Rice. Bolton may be another good choice just to rile the Dems.

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

#3. Could most all of this NAU and the massive illegal immigration be coming at the "command" of the VP and some other hidden forces?

You over-estimate the power of Dick Cheney. The NAU is most likely being directed by international banking interests. The explanation for that statement is probably longer than you want to hear in this thread.

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

#4. Is there any chance that President Bush is or has been being coherced to do as he has done regarding the borders?

I have explained before that raising the debt ceiling cannot occur without additional collateral. Because the economy was facing a downturn in its Clintonian hangover, the only way to increase the debt ceiling was to increase the collateralized chattel. There weren't enough actual Americans being born to provide the required increase in human chattel, so a massive influx of foreigners was the only quick fix. At least that's my theory as to at least one reason for the policy.

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

#5. I keep getting the feeling that although he has gone along with all of this obviously, that there seems to be a few times that I have sensed or thought that he is not totally for all of this....as though he could switch gears on this open borders and amnesty scheme. (Again, I have heard at least one person say that they have also had that thought or sense a few times themself). What do you think about that?

See above. Other Presidents have been killed for crossing the banks (see: Lincoln, Kennedy). I'm not sure that Bush has that sort of courage or even that he's not knowingly complicit. If Bush is to surprise us and change course, I would expect the change to come very late in the administration and be VERY major, encompassing immigration, the debt system, the war, and many other issues simultaneously. If I can see that, THEY can see that. There is a mechanism for dealing with such possibilities from lame duck Presidents, who are the only ones likely to start considering crossing their puppetmasters. Do you know what it is? Think about all of the recent two-term Presidents. Do you see anything in common? Each of them has been weighed down with a debilitating scandal at the end of his second term. Let's work backward.

Clinton faced impeachment.
Reagan was mired in Iran-Contra.
Nixon had Watergate.
LBJ didn't need to be controlled because his predecessor...
JFK was assassinated in his second term.
Eisenhower was debilitated with a series of suspicious strokes and heart attacks, then gave the "Military Industrial Complex" speech on his way out the door.

Get it?

I would expect some crazy fireworks at the end of this administration because Bush is a stubborn guy who just may get it in his head to do things his way and not let any scandal or cratered approval ratings deter him. Unless of course he is completely complicit with the "plan," which is entirely possible.

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

End of LegalUSCitizen's Questionaire. I'm just searching for answers to many questions that I have tonight. Thank you.

Well, I don't know how satisfying those answers were, but I'll bet you won't get any of them from any other poster here.

Thank you so much, Crocket. That is just what I needed to know. The truth and the possibilities. I have to think about all of this, but initially it appears to me that we have had presidents who have tried to fight back for us. I will try to maintain very skeptical hope, but to at least have hope. Thank you again.

Crocket, I noticed you didn't list Bush Sr. Is this because he has been wholeheatedly for a one world order? If past presidents have had bad things happen to them, and if Bush 1 was fully aware of this stealth agenda, why would he want to bring his son into the middle of such a dasdardly plot? He really believes in this and wants his son to finish what he started?

I don't know Kate, but it does make me wonder if it has anything to do with George Bush Sr. breaking down into tears when discussing his son some time ago. (maybe 3, 4 months ago on TV).

God Help us. We must try not to worry too much, I guess and just do the best that we can. It's good that we have each other to go through our country's problems together.

Because of the NACC now controling our three countries now, The presidents are no more then governers of there states(nations). That is why Mexico seems to be using there army over there to clean it, and Bush is trying to clean it a little here. They went to sell this right down are throat.