Thread: Need rapid activist reasearch help on amnesty vote and goodlatte bill

House GOP postpones key immigration vote

House defeats one GOP immigration bill, delays vote on second plan

By: Jamie Dupree
Updated: Jun 21, 2018 - 3:01 PM

List of Republicans that voted against Goodlatte Bill.



Read the rest at
https://www.alipac.us/f12/list-repub...ond-pl-359815/

Updated: 6:50 p.m.: House Republicans are delaying a vote on a ‘compromise’ immigration package until next week, Speaker Paul Ryan told lawmakers.

A vote had been set for Thursday, but GOP leaders announced earlier that it would take place on Friday. Republicans now plan to modify the bill again in a bid to win 218 votes next week.

Originally Posted by Newmexican

House defeats one GOP immigration bill, delays vote on second plan

By: Jamie Dupree
Updated: Jun 21, 2018 - 3:01 PM

List of Republicans that voted against Goodlatte Bill.



Read the rest at
https://www.alipac.us/f12/list-repub...ond-pl-359815/

I suspect a few of these folks had planned on voting against both bills. A few that immediately come to mind are Gohmert, Gosar, King (IA), and maybe Rohrabacher.

Originally Posted by JohnDoe2

Updated: 6:50 p.m.: House Republicans are delaying a vote on a ‘compromise’ immigration package until next week, Speaker Paul Ryan told lawmakers.

A vote had been set for Thursday, but GOP leaders announced earlier that it would take place on Friday. Republicans now plan to modify the bill again in a bid to win 218 votes next week.

Now it's time for the corrupt backroom deals, promises, and arm twisting.

Under our immigration law, no court has jurisdiction to hear any attack on the validity of an order of removal! Why are we waiting to repatriate them and why running up an enormous bill, burdening U.S. taxpayers to pay judges to hear more than 600,000 backlogged cases! Absent the court’s jurisdiction, any decision a judge made or might make are void, not merely voidable. They must be expunged from the record. Without jurisdiction of the court, they are of no force or effect—as if they never happened. Here’s the law:

Sec. 235.1 (a)(D) Inspection. (emph. added)


(D) Limit on collateral attacks.-In any action brought against an alien under section 275(a) or section 276, the court shall not have jurisdiction to hear any claim attacking the validity of an order of removal entered under subparagraph (A)(i) or (B)(iii).


INA: ACT 275 - ENTRY OF ALIEN AT IMPROPER TIME OR PLACE; MISREPRESENTATION AND CONCEALMENT OF FACTS


Sec. 275. [8 U.S.C. 1325]


(a) Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or b oth, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.


INA: ACT 276 - REENTRY OF REMOVED ALIEN
Sec. 276. [8 U.S.C. 1326]

(a) Subject to subsection (b) any alien who- ,

(1)has been denied admission, excluded, deported, or removed, or has departed the United States while an order of exclusion, deportation, or removal is outstanding, and thereafter

(2) enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in, the United States, unless (A) prior to his reembarkation at a place outside the United States or his application for admission from foreign contiguous territory, the Attorney General has expressly consented to such alien's reapplying for admission; or (B) with respect to an alien previously denied admission and removed , unless such alien shall establish that he was not required to obtain such advance consent under this or any prior Act, shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.



On February 20, 2017, DHS secretary John Kelly published a memo stating that DHS would expand expedited removal, with no court hearing, to any apprehended immigrant who was not inspected by an immigration officer at the U.S. border and who cannot prove that he or she has been continuously present in the U.S. for more than two years. (I have the link to this memorandum, but it would likely break and I’m not sure if shortened links are allowed here. If allowed, I would be glad to post it using TinyUrl or similar.)

The law cited above is unambiguous: no court has jurisdiction to hear an attack against the validity of an order of removal.

"The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently held that a void order is void at all times, does not have to be reversed or vacated by a judge, cannot be made valid by any judge, nor does it gain validity by the passage of time. The order is void ab initio” see Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348, 41 S.Ct. 116 (1920).

Purge court records! Expunge previous void decisions immediately, dismiss with prejudice every scheduled hearing to which the law applies, and send the families home so they can be together.

The Cruz-Feinstein Immigration Bill

House GOP Plans Wednesday Vote on Compromise Immigration Bill

E-VERIFY, Guest Workers not in bill for Wed. vote

(Activist instructions and meme to share posted below this release)

Today's Amnesty Bill HR 6136 Would Silence 1.8 Million Trump Voters

For National Release | June 27, 2018

Call and help rally others to join us on the phones by e-mail and on (FACEBOOK HERE) .. (TWITTER HERE) .. (GAB HERE) .. (ALIPAC HERE)



https://www.alipac.us/f8/todays-amne...voters-359994/