Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member CountFloyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Occupied Territories, Alta Mexico
    Posts
    3,008

    Now Dubai Eyes a Key Defense Contractor

    Now Dubai Eyes a Key Defense Contractor

    BY ELI LAKE - Staff Reporter of the Sun
    April 12, 2006
    URL: http://www.nysun.com/article/30831

    CAIRO, Egypt - A confidential Treasury Department review of a United Arab Emirates firm's pending purchase of the British-based contractor that makes components for a tank used by the U.S. Army is expected to go to the White House as soon as this week, according to administration officials.

    The proposed $1.2 billion deal is almost identical to Dubai Ports World's takeover of the British firm that operated American ports from Miami to New York. But in this case, the proposed buyer, Dubai International Capital, would gain control of a British company, Doncasters Group Limited, that builds the specialized turbine fan blades for the M-1 Abrams Tank, and is also a key contractor in the development of the new stealth joint strike fighter airplane.

    The ruler of Dubai, Sheik Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Makhtoum, owns the majority stake in Dubai International Capital.

    A British business publication, Business Online, reported last week that the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States will conclude in its review that the deal poses no threat to national security, a move that would normally clear the way for its approval.

    President Bush has 15 days after that date to object to the proposed deal. A Treasury Department spokesman yesterday said he could not comment on the confidential review.

    The Dubai International Capital proposal has all the makings of an even more intense political fight than the scuttled ports deal, which ended only when Dubai Ports World agreed to sell the American ports facilities to American "entities."

    Already, the Doncasters deal has attracted scrutiny from the ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Ike Skelton of Missouri and his colleague on that panel, Rep. John Barrow, a Democrat of Georgia.

    In an interview yesterday, Mr. Barrow said,"I am not against foreigners investing in this country as long as we don't sell them something we are not supposed to sell them. But I am concerned about selling off our national security infrastructure. We are selling off the military industrial complex bit by bit."

    Mr. Barrow said he was particularly angry at the White House and Treasury Department for failing to give him straight answers about the deal, considering one of Doncasters's plants is in his district in Rincon, Ga. He and Mr. Skelton will be touring that plant today and will hold a press conference on the deal.

    "We have been pestering them about this, trying to get some person to understand this for more than a month. Today I had my first conversation. I asked to speak to the treasury secretary. I ended up talking to an assistant secretary at Treasury who does not know when the investigation will finish or whether a recommendation has been made," he said.

    Mr. Barrow added, "I don't think it's politicizing the process to know what the hell is going on.It would not be caught up in the politics of the moment if we had a meaningful process over the years."

    Mr. Barrow introduced legislation in March that would require the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States to notify relevant members of Congress of their decisions to approve or reject foreign investments that may impact national security. The legislation would also move the committee to the Department of Homeland Security.

    Mr. Barrow said yesterday that he is far less concerned about allies like Britain investing in America's defense industry than countries like the United Arab Emirates.

    "The UAE just doesn't have Great Britain's track record as an ally in the war on terror," he said."[Dubai] had some of their nationals they could not account for take part in 9/11. Some of their financial institutions were complicit in the 9/11 plans.Their ports have been conduits for alarming shipments to Iran, and they were one of three governments to recognize the Taliban."

    Nonetheless, the Bush administration and former intelligence officers have given the Emirates high marks for their work in the global war on terror.

    They have cited the UAE's intelligence service's cooperation with the CIA in providing bank records and financial intelligence on possible terrorist front companies and business closely linked with Iran.

    The UAE also allows the U.S. Navy to dock most of its ships patrolling the Persian Gulf.
    It's like hell vomited and the Bush administration appeared.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,377
    Forgive me, I didn't read the entire story - but I am bothered by this President's close ties with Dubai.

    This President's financial backers in one of his failed businesses was a Dubai official or ruling family member - dont' know their structure.

    Also, even now Neil Bush's newst venture, a software company, is being backed financially by Dubai.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member CountFloyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Occupied Territories, Alta Mexico
    Posts
    3,008
    The Bush family has strong ties and business connections in both the Middle East and Mexico.
    It's like hell vomited and the Bush administration appeared.

  4. #4
    Senior Member crazybird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Joliet, Il
    Posts
    10,175
    They just don't stop pushing the agenda do they.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member Mamie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    2,587
    what's the difference in this and the other proposal? they're still selling out to foreigners . . .

    can somebody please tell me why we need with the federal government? it was to "provide for our common defense and general welfare" and protect us against invasion -- it has done neither . . .


    TO: Bush, Kerry, Kennedy and McCain, and others,

    WE THE PEOPLE have decided to give to 'undocumented' immigrants the properties of their supporters including all real estate, automobiles, health care benefits, retirement benefits, etc.. WE THE PEOPLE have decided to keep what is by law ours.
    "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it" George Santayana "Deo Vindice"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •