Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    35,138

    OBAMA’S TRADE AGREEMENT LEAKS AS REPUBLICANS COWER

    OBAMA’S TRADE AGREEMENT LEAKS AS REPUBLICANS COWER

    Jacquelyn Martin/AP

    by BEN SHAPIRO
    4 Jun 2015


    On Thursday, Wikileaks released new information about the international trade deal being negotiated by the Obama administration in secret and with the approval of many top Congressional Republicans.

    According to the documents released regarding the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA), which involves the United States, the European Union, and 23 other countries, the draft TISA would require all signatories to allow suppliers to keep private information of customers outside their territory. In other words, if a Pakistani company does business in the United States, that company would not be required to keep American customer information in the U.S. and could instead store that information in Pakistan. Leftists are particularly exorcised about one proposal from Turkey that would allow health tourism to foreign countries, reimbursed by home countries’ health insurance plans.

    Speaker of the House Rep. John Boehner (R-OH)
    supports giving President Obama Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), also known as fast-track authority, to negotiate trade agreements that would then be handed over to Congress for an up-or-down vote without any amendments allowed. Boehner explained to The Hill:

    This is not about the president; frankly, it’s about the country. It’s why I’ve worked with the president on a number of trade agreements over the course of his tenure and my tenure as Speaker.
    The idea behind fast-track authority is that the president will not feel free to negotiate, and no one will negotiate with him, if any agreement is subjected to the prospect that a negotiated agreement could be renegotiated by a third party – namely, Congress. But this is a particularly odd argument, because it assumes that the president wants to give away more than is in the United States’ interest to give away. After all, the president can use the possibility of Congressional wrangling as a leverage point in negotiations: “How can I go back to Congress with this proposal? You know they’ll simply amend it. If you give me X, however, then I can fairly assure you that we’ll get this deal done.” Congress provides a convenient and useful “bad cop” for any president hoping to negotiate an international agreement.

    Unless Congress doesn’t want to play bad cop. And that’s a matter of trust that changes from time-to-time. That’s why Congress should never grant TPA – it should always provide a check on the president in terms of his power to negotiate unilaterally. The executive branch should always carry in the back of its mind the fact that the legislature has final approval over any treaty, and that Congress won’t be forced to accept a crap sandwich in which it likes some material but not other material.

    Congressional Republicans, however, seem to prefer the crap sandwich approach, just as they preferred the omnibus approach to budgeting that resulted in full funding for Obamacare and Obama’s executive amnesty. By giving Obama the authority to negotiate a trade agreement unilaterally, and tying their own hands by exclusively allowing an up-or-down vote, Congress avoids culpability. They can always claim that they had no power to amend the treaty, and that they had to vote for it because it contained so much good material.

    And herein lies the problem with the current structure of America’s executive-led government. Congress always has incentive to pass the buck to the executive; the executive always has the incentive to maximize its own power. TPA is just the latest example of that Congressional abdication in action, even if that abdication is in the service of a generally good cause like free trade.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...blicans-cower/


  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    52,380
    And herein lies the problem with the current structure of America’s executive-led government. Congress always has incentive to pass the buck to the executive; the executive always has the incentive to maximize its own power. TPA is just the latest example of that Congressional abdication in action, even if that abdication is in the service of a generally good cause like free trade.
    Free trade is NOT a "generally good cause". It is always a bad cause for the higher developed country. It's always a sell out of a nation like ours. That's why we have trade laws, that's why we were a protectionist nation, not an isolationist nation, but a protectionist nation that regulates imports and assesses tariffs to ensure our nation with a high standard of living isn't robbed of producers, jobs and incomes that meet our standards and serve as our economic foundation by imports that don't.
    Last edited by Judy; 06-05-2015 at 05:50 PM.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    3,185
    This particular Congress is making it pretty clear that they will work for 21 days just to come in and argue budget matters, but they are quite afraid of making decisions and accepting responsibility. I really did not think it was possible to become less responsible that the last, but this republican Congress is treading now very close to it.

    I do not apologize for voting against my entire delegation. bot my Senators have poor NumbersUSA grades, but that is no surprise.

    Cruz embarrassed himself, myself, and the entire state of Texas not showing any support for a fellow official busy burying his son. How crass can republicans be? I felt it for Joe, I faced the same from "everyday republicans" not for a few days, but for many years. Someone best put a muzzle on Cruz, he is not endearing republicans to Americans.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-17-2015, 03:21 AM
  2. Another Trade Agreement!?
    By kathyet2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-30-2014, 09:22 AM
  3. No Trade Agreement Fast Track for Obama's Next Power Grab
    By HAPPY2BME in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-16-2013, 01:56 PM
  4. TPP Trade Agreement a "Top Priority" for Second Obama Administration
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-21-2013, 09:09 PM
  5. Republicans Need Not Cower to the Center
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-20-2008, 12:12 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •