Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,714

    Obamnesty First, Security Second?

    Immigration: The president tells a border state U.S. senator that if we beef up border protection Democrats will lose the bargaining chip for comprehensive immigration reform. Forget national sovereignty — sue Arizona!

    As the Obama administration prepares to sue the state of Arizona to block its copycat enforcement of federal immigration law, Arizona Republican Sen. Jon Kyl reveals that in a private meeting President Obama put his party's agenda above the nation's sovereignty.

    Last Friday, Kyl told the audience at a North Tempe Tea Party town hall meeting:

    "I met with the president in the Oval Office (regarding securing the southern border with Mexico)," Kyl said, "just the two of us . .. here's what the president said. 'The problem is,' he said, 'If we secure the border, then you all won't have any reason to support comprehensive immigration reform.'"

    If we secure the border? The nation's security is a bargaining chip for politically motivated legislation with political consequences?

    Every nation has a right to protect its borders, and our commander in chief has a duty to protect ours. Refusal to do so for political reasons is unconscionable. Our border states should not remain exposed to the escalating violence of a Mexican drug war that has already claimed the life of one Arizona rancher.

    The murderers of Robert Krentz escaped to a protected pronghorn antelope area that the Interior Department of Secretary Ken Salazar had placed off limits to U.S. border patrol agents in order to protect endangered species.

    So unserious is the administration about protecting the border that it has placed off limits some 4.3 million acres of wilderness area that has become both a haven and a highway for illegal aliens, drug smugglers, human traffickers and potential terrorists.


    Arizona is now the kidnapping capital of the United States, and Phoenix has the second-largest kidnapping problem in the world, just behind Mexico City. Claremont Institute fellows William J. Bennett and Seth Leibsohn, writing in National Review, report that someone is kidnapped every 35 hours in Phoenix.

    According to the Maricopa County Attorney's Office, kidnapping in Arizona increased 402% between 2004 and 2008, with almost 70% of the kidnapping cases submitted for prosecution involving illegal immigrants.

    This is part of a much bigger crime picture. The Center for Immigration Studies reports that while illegal aliens make up 9% of the Arizona population, they are responsible for 22% of the felonies in the state and they constitute 11% of the state prison population.

    Instead of securing the border, the Obama administration is preparing to sue Arizona for doing the feds' job by passing SB 1070, which mimics existing federal law.

    The irony here is that the Department of Homeland Security has Memorandums of Agreement (MOAs) with around 70 state and local law enforcement agencies to participate in program 287(g) partnerships to enforce federal law.

    Nine of these jurisdictions are in Arizona and all of the agreements were inked while Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano was Arizona governor. Last October, Napolitano said these "agreements promote public safety by prioritizing the identification and removal of dangerous criminal aliens and ensure consistency and stronger federal oversight of state and local immigration law enforcement efforts across the nation."

    Under these agreements, local law enforcement is trained and authorized to enforce federal immigration laws by arresting criminal illegal aliens. Nationwide the program has ID'd and processed for removal more than 110,000 criminal aliens since January 2006.

    The Obama administration wants to sue Arizona for doing what it authorized Arizona to do. No court should allow that.

    In a statement issued Friday after it was confirmed the administration was preparing to sue, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer called Obama's decision "outrageous" but "not surprising."

    "Our federal government should be using its legal resources to fight illegal immigration, not the law-abiding citizens of Arizona," Arizona's governor said. We concur.

    President Obama's words to Sen. Kyl seem to indicate a willingness to hold the American people hostage to a political agenda and should be roundly condemned. We need to plug the hole on our southern border first.
    http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysi ... cond-.aspx

  2. #2
    Senior Member bigtex's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    3,362
    More than likely it will be amnesty first and an empty promise to seal the border that will never get done. Kind of like his promise to send troops to the southern border that he conveniently forgot about. His goal is to reward criminals and encourage more to come. The more poverty stricken, illiterates he can get here and give citizenship to the easier it will be for Obama and the Democrats to pass their socialist agendas on us all.
    Certified Member
    The Sons of the Republic of Texas

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3,757
    Keep in mind that there is nothing to bargain

    CIR is not in our constitution , But protecting the country by the federal govt is

    Obamba and his administration are in violation of their oath of office

    I think congress should haul Obamba and Kyl up there and get them both under oath and find out the truth of the matter.

    Of course Obamba would lie I'm sure.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    38
    Folks, this is nothing new to me, and hearing a Senator tell a "between him and I" story is nothing new either...just look at Joe Sestak. If indeed this happened, then our crooked senate should hold hearings to determine the validity of these claims, then start impeachment proceedings? Come on, the Messiah would never get caught saying something like this. I'm sure that some "spin" will be put on it, and once again it is acceptable to play with U.S. Citizens lives.

    First, there is no one in this country who will stand up to the Messiah.

    Two, even if validated, it would be turned around to make the accusers look like racist.

    Three, I am surprised that Senator Kyl even admitted that in public. Can you imagine?

    Four, We are stuck with the Messiah for another 2.5 years. Get used to it. But we can make a difference in November!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •