Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #21
    Senior Member CountFloyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Occupied Territories, Alta Mexico
    Posts
    3,008
    Ok, I've reconsidered my position.

    I say impeach the SOB. His performance during Katrina has been appalling.

    Even if it doesn't get him out of office, hopefully it will distract him enough to keep from doing additional damage to the country.

    Maybe Cheney would be better after all.
    It's like hell vomited and the Bush administration appeared.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    625

    oz

    "Never mind that funny little man behind the curtain."

    Whorehay-The Wizard of Oz. cheers glenn

  3. #23
    JackSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    458
    I like Pat Buchanan and I hate Bush's immigration policy BUT there are no grounds to IMPEACH Bush! SORRY! How many DEMS went along with Iraq? dID hILARY VOTE TO ATACK iRAQ? i THINK SHE DID!

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,032
    No grounds to impeach Bush, you say, Jack? Where have you been for the last few years??

    Just his dereliction of duty concerning the illegal immigrants is grounds for impeachment...it is, in fact, treason against this country. His first and foremost duty is to protect the states from invasion. Not stand up before a very carefully selected audience and say such pap as "These poor hardworking people may walk for days in the desert heat...'' etc...there were NO AMERICANS in that crowd I assure you...only his anti-american supporters and illegal aliens.

    RR
    The men who try to do something and fail are infinitely better than those who try to do nothing and succeed. " - Lloyd Jones

  5. #25
    Senior Member dman1200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    3,631
    Quote Originally Posted by RoadRunner
    No grounds to impeach Bush, you say, Jack? Where have you been for the last few years??

    Just his dereliction of duty concerning the illegal immigrants is grounds for impeachment...it is, in fact, treason against this country. His first and foremost duty is to protect the states from invasion. Not stand up before a very carefully selected audience and say such pap as "These poor hardworking people may walk for days in the desert heat...'' etc...there were NO AMERICANS in that crowd I assure you...only his anti-american supporters and illegal aliens.

    RR
    Thank you. I was about to say the same thing, only what I was about to say was going to be alot more harsh.

    We can impeach a sitting president for having sex with an intern, but we can't do the same thing to an incompetent jerk who's responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans and has literally bankrupted our nation economically? Give me a break. If any president was ever deserving of impeachment it's Bush.
    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Lonetree, CO
    Posts
    543
    It never ceases to amaze me how much devotion and loyalty one has for a “Political party�. I personally know of many who voted for Boosh just because they are “rePublican’t� and the entire time he was Pres the first 4 years they protest against his ideals for Corporate America and the job replacement programs that he thinks are great for our country and economy. I never have understood it and never will, vote for what you feel is right vote for who is best for us, don’t just vote for a “Political party�.
    "I can because I will, I will because I can" ME

  7. #27
    BlueHills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    356
    If he hadn't resigned, Nixon would likely have been impeached for covering up, after the fact, what amounted to nothing more than one silly illegal entry into a hotel suite. Whether or not the burglars even found anything useful to them or damaging to the victims (the DNC), I can't remember.

    GWB, covers up and condones something like 8,000 illegal entries per day that have in many cases far more damaging consequences such as murder, rape, destruction of property, intimidation, real property theft, etc. and, of course, all 8,000 entries are illegal in and of themselves.

    So, it would seem that if Nixon committed an impeachable offense, then so has GWB.

    The difference between the two is that the media and opposition party sees no political benefit in challenging Bush on these breakins and subsequent cover ups. They are all in on it together. Bush is likely to stay in power because he serves our new complementary religions of maximum profit for the few and political correctness for all very well.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Lonetree, CO
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by BlueHills
    The difference between the two is that the media and opposition party sees no political benefit in challenging Bush on these breakins and subsequent cover ups.
    That is because they are subsidiaries of the fascist globalists companies that are working ever so hard for a global government (I can't wait till a Chinese dictator is in charge!). Seeing that the WTO AND THE SOON TO BE FTAA call all the shots, they are dictated as to what they can air.
    I am surprised that Lou The Man Dobbs has as many liberties as he does. They probably just let him do what he does to quench the thirst that people like I need to see on the air.
    "I can because I will, I will because I can" ME

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •