DEBATE BETWEEN REP TOM TANCREDO AND A PRO ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIVE (SORRY DIDNT CATCH HIS NAME)

Here is my problem with there discussion. Tom was accused of "vilifying" the entire Hispanic race, accused of having an "agenda", and when Tom asked very plainly after the opposition stated that "English" would be required to gain citizenship (through the amnesty proposals) if they would still require us to have "Spanish" ballots the opposition stated yes. Tom also mentioned about the split culture damage caused in Canada by the mix of the English and French language, of which I agree has caused them an array of issues.

To me this is complete hypocracy! If English is to be required for citizenship by the opposition then why the hell should we keep printing ballots in Spanish!?? Tom not once tried to "vilify" anyone during the conversation nor did the opposition prove any was committed when asked. As to having an agenda.. like the opposition has not had some agenda from the get go??

To me, the opposition was being a complete jack ass and resorted to being directly accusational and basicly name calling towards Tom when put on the spot with direct questions. Even the host asked how to classify the difference between giving amnesty and basicly just opening the whole damn border and didnt get a reasonable reply.

SYMPATHY VOTE

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080261/

Massive turnout at immigration rallies: Are you more sympathetic to their cause? * 15529 responses

Yes 25% No 75%

Thanks