Quote Originally Posted by 17patri76 View Post
Firstly: Trump needs to replace Jeff Sessions with somebody who will actually go after Democrats who break the law. Nothing happened to that woman at the IRS after it was established that the agency was indeed targeting conservative groups. Sessions did nothing to prosecute any guilty parties. Hillary still walks the streets and Sessions sits on his hands. The whole Russian election collusion fiasco has happened because Sessions rescued himself from the investigation even though it was not necessary for him to do it.

Sessions needs to go. Then Trump needs to appoint a real Attorney General. Sheriff Joe Clark of Milwaukee comes to mind. He said if he were Attorney General he would have Hillary in handcuffs. Once we have a guy like that, then Trump should tell the Justice Department to investigate voting fraud in the Alabama senate election. This is how to deal with the Alabama travesty.
The IRS thing didn't happen under Jeff Sessions watch. To blame him for the failures of the Obama administration is ridiculous. What, is he supposed to go back an prosecute everything that we think every administration before Trump's got wrong? As for his recusal on the Russia collusion probe, he did the right thing because he was an active part of Trump's campaign. Furthermore, his recusal was in following with DOJ policy. Had he not recused himself, the Democrats would still be screaming bloody murder and it would have ended up being disastrous for the Trump administration in the public court of opinion.

I believe AG Sessions is doing a fantastic job dealing with our immigration and illegal immigration problems. He is, without question, reversing the weak policies of Jeh Johnson, Loretta Lynch, and Obama. IMO, anyone that questions his seriousness and sincerity in dealing with why we're here (on ALIPAC) hasn't been paying close attention to the actions he has taken and is taking in the fight against illegal immigration and excessive immigration. AG Sessions has been a very busy and industrious man on the issues that bring us together here on ALIPAC.

As for Sheriff Joe Clark. What has he really done on the issue other than act as an invited spokesman on the Fox News Network? Sure, he talks a big game but saying and doing are not the same thing. While Sheriff Joe Clark may be a satisfactory choice for a position in DHS, I don't think he is really qualified to head the DOJ. Interestingly, I didn't even know the retired Sheriff Clark was a registered Democrat until I researched him.