Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 45 of 45
Like Tree31Likes

Thread: The 'Queen of the Hill' on a DACA Deal

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #41
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,661
    jtdc wrote:

    If you stop picking and choosing, and take into custody, and deport, all illegal aliens we find, we will get rid of the gang members as well. But if you must prove they are a gang member or other criminal before you can deport them, you will never win!
    Yes, exactly. It adds a second burden of proof that isn't necessary for a deportation in the United States.
    jtdc and Beezer like this.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #42
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,628
    Quote Originally Posted by jtdc View Post
    No, we have the resources. But politics gets in the way. When a cop stops a car for some violation, the officer SHOULD be required to check legality of the driver. If they are not legal, they must be taken into custody, not released. Pretty soon, they would run out of cars and would dare not drive. That would cripple them from getting to work or having illegal businesses. That would put a dent in the illegal's attraction to be here.

    No! If you stop picking and choosing, and take into custody, and deport, all illegal aliens we find, we will get rid of the gang members as well. But if you must prove they are a gang member or other criminal before you can deport them, you will never win!

    No, actually we don't have the necessary resources and it's politics that hold us back. If we had the resources, we would have the Trump border wall, more BP, more ICE agents, more detention capacity, etc. More directed funding = more resources. More resources = more efficiency and capability.

    It's not "picking and choosing," it's focusing our limited resources where we'll get the most bang for our buck. I see you conveniently left off my comment regarding the rounding up of all those we come into contact while going after the more violent ones. No illegal that comes into contact with law enforcement should get a free pass. However, willy-nilly (random) enforcement will expend our resources haphazardly and allow many of the violent criminals to remain free for longer periods of time, which could mean more senseless deaths. However, I also believe our focusing efforts should include large scale business raids. I'm talking about raids where we can pop 50 to 200 illegals at one time.

    Once our primary focused targets have dried up somewhat, we can then readjust our focus accordingly. Flailing about like a crippled octopus with too many arms just isn't smart, efficient enforcement.



    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    1,810
    Quote Originally Posted by MW View Post
    No, actually we don't have the necessary resources and it's politics that hold us back. If we had the resources, we would have the Trump border wall, more BP, more ICE agents, more detention capacity, etc.
    Granted, those would help. But it is properly using the resources we already have. City and state police detaining illegal aliens and turning them over to ICE would would take away from the secure feeling illegal aliens have when they feel they only have to fear ICE. Those resources are there right now, but are not being used. Again, granted, sanctuary cities running interference are a big part of the problem. But then again, if the feds prosecuted police, mayors, governors, and such, under existing laws, those would soon disappear. And we don't need additional resources for all of them. Libby Schaff and a couple of others off to prison, and you wouldn't need more jails, BP officers or immigration judges.

    Quote Originally Posted by MW
    More directed funding = more resources. More resources = more efficiency and capability.
    So you think throwing more money at the problem will make it go away?

    Quote Originally Posted by MW
    It's not "picking and choosing," it's focusing our limited resources where we'll get the most bang for our buck.
    Correct!

    Quote Originally Posted by MW
    I see you conveniently left off my comment regarding the rounding up of all those we come into contact while going after the more violent ones. No illegal that comes into contact with law enforcement should get a free pass.
    THAT'S WHAT I SAID!

    Quote Originally Posted by MW
    However, I also believe our focusing efforts should include large scale business raids. I'm talking about raids where we can pop 50 to 200 illegals at one time.
    Fine, if you deport them rather that giving those who don't have a criminal record or an already existing deportation order, a 180 days to report for a court hearing. If they are not here legally, they go right now!
    Judy likes this.

  4. #44
    Senior Member MontereySherry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,370
    Another thing they did under Obama's DACA was adjust their status by using AP (advance parole). With AP they were able to leave the U.S. for family emergencies, work related business and school related studies. When they returned their records were adjusted to show they entered the U.S. legally.
    They really took advantage and abused advance parole but for some reason even though they are again getting DACA they are not being issued advance parole. This is a huge deal to them and one of their complaints. Poor babies.
    Judy, MW and GeorgiaPeach like this.

  5. #45
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    95,620
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345

Similar Threads

  1. Call DC To Stop New Amnesty Plot: Queen of the Hill Rule
    By ALIPAC in forum illegal immigration Announcements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-09-2018, 03:55 PM
  2. STATEMENT: CAP’s Tom Jawetz Applauds ‘Queen of the Hill’ Rule, Reminds Every Member t
    By GeorgiaPeach in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-07-2018, 02:26 PM
  3. 82 Activists Arrested On Capitol Hill Over DACA Protest
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-17-2018, 10:08 PM
  4. GOP Finalizing DACA Deal Package, DACA Amnesty
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-15-2017, 03:51 AM
  5. Motion Filed To Revoke Plea Deal In Former Beauty Queen's As
    By stevetheroofer in forum Videos about Illegal Immigration, refugee programs, globalism, & socialism
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-13-2010, 09:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •