Thread: ROMNEY AHEAD 7 PTS IN CALIFORNIA!!!

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/ ... 22&sp=true

In the Republican race, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney held a 7-point advantage on Arizona Sen. John McCain in California, while McCain added to commanding double-digit leads in New York and New Jersey.

Of course McCain is ahead in N.Y. & N.J. we're sanctuary states and the wolf is guarding the henhouse at our polls.

This news article is really funny. The first three paragraphs are about Mitt's hair.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080205/D8UK4BC80.html

ABOARD XTRA AIRWAYS FLIGHT 314 (AP) - It took a 37-hour trip to do something that eight rivals and a 12-month campaign couldn't: muss Mitt Romney's hair.

The Republican presidential contender's signature coif was in disarray when he touched down in Charleston, W.Va., at 5 a.m. Tuesday amid a more than 5,000-mile, coast-to-coast-to-coast dash aimed at bettering rival John McCain in the Super Tuesday nominating contests.

After flitting from Nashville, Tenn., to Atlanta to Oklahoma City to Long Beach, Calif., on Monday, Romney turned around and flew a redeye to Charleston, W.Va., so he could address the GOP state convention Tuesday morning.

The overnight flight left Romney with a bad case of bed-head, but 30 seconds in the forward lavatory with a comb and some water and - Shazam! - he was good as new.

I just heard a very positive discussion regarding California. Let's stay positive.

I am CA and I am registered as a democrat still (slow to wake up ) so how would my primary vote best be used? Also, is it true I should be voting 'no' on just about all the props? I would like some advice - I've been so busy looking for a job some of the finer details are lost on me. Thanks.

Originally Posted by sofedup

Also, is it true I should be voting 'no' on just about all the props? I would like some advice - I've been so busy looking for a job some of the finer details are lost on me. Thanks.

Ignore 91, vote NO on 92 and 93. 94 through 97 is up to you, if you think CA Indian tribes and the state should get more gambling money instead of Vegas casino owners, vote yes. If not, vote no.

Originally Posted by Bowman

Originally Posted by sofedup

Also, is it true I should be voting 'no' on just about all the props? I would like some advice - I've been so busy looking for a job some of the finer details are lost on me. Thanks.

Ignore 91, vote NO on 92 and 93. 94 through 97 is up to you, if you think CA Indian tribes and the state should get more gambling money instead of Vegas casino owners, vote yes. If not, vote no.

Agree totally... my take on 94-97 ... fix the problem first with the budget first, dont rely on the casinos to bail us out... no on 94-97
Happy Voting

sofedup said: I am CA and I am registered as a democrat still (slow to wake up ) so how would my primary vote best be used? Also, is it true I should be voting 'no' on just about all the props?

The same here. Both my husband and myself are trying to decide. However I am going to vote yes on the tribal gaming props. It's great that outsiders want us to vote no. Nevada doesn't want us to pass these props because it would cut into their revenue and our fellow patriots want to make the point that illegal immigrants are costing us, so California should sink, but when it comes down to it, you and I will be the ones to further suffer. So for me no on prop 91-93 and yes on 94-97.