Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member American-ized's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Monroe County, New York
    Posts
    3,530

    Roseanne Barr Says Impeach Obama?

    Roseanne Barr Says Impeach Obama?

    The Patriot Update
    December 21, 2011




    Guess who is calling for the impeachment of Barack Obama now?

    Former sitcom mother,stand-up comedienne,and self-proclaimed “domestic goddess”Roseanne Barr.


    On her official website,RoseanneWorld,the celebrity —who bears an uncanny resemblance to Herman Cain’s alleged sexual harassment victim Sharon Bialek —posted an article simply entitled, “Impeach Obama.


    The article states that Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012,which allows U.S. citizens to be detained indefinitely without train,possibly turned over to foreign police and tortured.


    The article connects Democratic support for the bill with corporate backing.


    Among the supporters of NDAA are California-based manufacturer Surefire,L.L.C.,who won a $23 million contract from the Department of Defense three months ago. Also contributing to the cause (and the lawmakers who voted ‘yes’) are Honeywell (who secured a $93 million deal with the Pentagon last May and a $24 million contract this year) and Bluewater Defense,a longtime DoD-ally that produces,among other garments,fire resistant combat uniforms.

    http://patriotupdate.com/16107/rosea...-impeach-obama

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2
    I don't understand how Obumbler and his cronies do all they can to aid, abet and protect illegal aliens, by crying racism and all that garbage. Then they think it's OK to detain US citizens? W.T.F. is wrong with this picture? Did they follow Alice down the rabbit hole?

  3. #3
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,706
    This is actually a very significant article. If Barr is turning on Obama, it means that large swaths of the left may be joining the right in condemnation of the National Defense Authorization Act. There may be real hope for America yet if we can gain consensus against the Global elites and their servants like Bush and Obama.. aka BushObama.

    W

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,966
    Quote Originally Posted by ALIPAC View Post
    This is actually a very significant article. If Barr is turning on Obama, it means that large swaths of the left may be joining the right in condemnation of the National Defense Authorization Act. There may be real hope for America yet if we can gain consensus against the Global elites and their servants like Bush and Obama.. aka BushObama.

    W
    All we can do is pray and hope. But if you don't want to turn blue and pass out, don't hold your breath..
    it means that large swaths of the left may be joining the right in condemnation of the National Defense Authorization Act.
    Plus, they (the left) are the ones that let these laws be passed, while we conservatives fight tooth and nail to keep our liberties. Obviously in this case again, our protests fell upon the deaf ears of the house on the hill. Well perhaps this the National Defense Authorization Act will get them thinking about where we're heading..Or unfortunately where we are..
    Last edited by airdale; 12-21-2011 at 09:43 PM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member 4thHorseman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Gulf Coast
    Posts
    1,003
    This is actually a very significant article. If Barr is turning on Obama, it means that large swaths of the left may be joining the right in condemnation of the National Defense Authorization Act. There may be real hope for America yet if we can gain consensus against the Global elites and their servants like Bush and Obama.. aka BushObama.
    This should not be surprising. The ACLU came out strongly against the indefinite detainment provisions of the bill. You would think that anyone with an ounce of sense would perceive the threat to all of us inherent in this provision. Oddly enough, this was pushed by the GOP, including so-called staunch conservatives. This was the same group that rammed through the original Patriot Act, which in my opinion is actually an Un-Patriotic Act. They feel the need to be able to usurp the Constitutional rights of any US citizen in the name of security, while simultaneously labeling common-sense profiling of non-US citizen members of known groups that foment terrorism and denial of human rights as somehow Unconstitutional. This is one more glaring example of the utter failure of our two-party political system., which is now totally unchecked and unbalanced.
    "We have met the enemy, and they is us." - POGO

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •