Lord God, I hope so. I am now using the term "ransacked" to describe how the US is losing on so many fronts. (Our military technology still outpaces everyone, but how much longer?) Though Clinton might present a militaristic hawkish tone, at least compared to her associates, what we really need is a genius to who can get others to agree to limitations. I've heard Reagan was urged on to reducing nuclear proliferation by Nancy Reagan, which doesn't surprise me. Trump bases his strategy on economic pressure, what our Commanders-in-Chief should have been doing before, or at least seriously considering. Advance the military technology so we have no rival. Hit 'em in the pocket book economically so that we can enforce truce conditions. We should have been able to get off Middle East oil ten or twenty years ago. Both parties share the blame!

Finally, nuclear power plant proliferation is dangerous, too. I worked in such a plant, and it is not dangerous to work in one (except Chernobyll ). But letting them be built in unstable countries is lunacy. We need to be able to offer them other means of power---which combined with appliance efficiency---opens up new export markets.