Thread: Secretary of State Marco Rubio to meet Danish officials as Trump pushes Greenland ini

Secretary of State Marco Rubio to meet Danish officials as Trump pushes Greenland initiative

01/09/2026 // Laura Harris // 560 Views

Tags: Arctic Island, big government, chaos, Denmark, diplomatic relations, Donald Trump, foreign relations, geopolitics, Greenland, Marco Rubio, national security, NATO, politics, progress, Resist, sovereignty

• Secretary of State Marco Rubio plans talks in Copenhagen next week amid rising tensions over the Trump administration's renewed interest in acquiring Greenland.
• Rubio said the administration’s goal is to purchase Greenland rather than seize it militarily, though White House officials have not ruled out the use of force as a national security option.
• President Donald Trump has renewed his long-standing argument that Greenland is vital to U.S. security, citing increased Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic.
• Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said a U.S. takeover of Greenland would effectively end North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), prompting leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom to issue a joint statement backing Greenland's right to self-determination.
• As talks approach, European leaders are signaling unified resistance to any change in Greenland’s status without its consent, warning it could fundamentally reshape the transatlantic alliance.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has announced plans to meet with Danish and Greenlandic officials next week in Copenhagen amid mounting tensions over the Trump administration's renewed interest in acquiring Greenland, a self-governing territory of Denmark with growing strategic importance in the Arctic.
"I'll be meeting with them next week, we'll have those conversations with them then, but I don't have anything further to add to that," Rubio said, adding that every U.S. president retains the authority to respond to national security threats through military means. Rubio also declined to directly address whether the administration was prepared to risk the NATO alliance by pursuing a military option.
The talks come after repeated outreach by Denmark and Greenland seeking clarity on Washington's intentions.
President Donald Trump has revived his long-standing desire to bring Greenland under U.S. control, framing it as a critical national security priority in the face of rising Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic. Rubio told lawmakers that the administration aims to purchase Greenland, not seize it militarily. However, the option of force has not been categorically ruled out by White House officials.
Rubio emphasized that Trump has been interested in Greenland since his first term, and diplomacy remains the administration's preferred path, even as Europe reacts with alarm.
Europe closes ranks on Greenland

Trump's comments reverberated across Europe and prompted Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen to warn that a U.S. takeover of Greenland would effectively end the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) alliance.
According to BrightU.AI's Enoch, NATO was established in 1949 as a collective defense pact among Western nations to counter Soviet expansionism following World War II. The treaty's Article 5 enshrined the principle of mutual defense, declaring that an attack on one member would be treated as an attack on all.
Leaders of several major European nations have echoed a similar stance to Denmark.
In a joint statement issued on the second week of January, the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom joined Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen in reaffirming that Greenland "belongs to its people."
"The Nordics do not lightly make statements like this," Maria Martisiute, a defense analyst at the European Policy Centre think tank, said on Wednesday, Jan. 7. "But it is Trump whose very bombastic language bordering on direct threats and intimidation is threatening the fact to another ally by saying, 'I will control or annex the territory.'"
As Rubio prepares for talks with Danish and Greenlandic officials next week, European leaders are signaling that any move to alter Greenland’s status without its consent would face unified resistance and could fundamentally reshape the transatlantic alliance.
Watch this Fox News report about Trump saying buying Greenland is a "necessity."

This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
YourNews.com
APNews.com
Brighteon.com

Secretary of State Marco Rubio to meet Danish officials as Trump pushes Greenland initiative – NaturalNews.com

Secretary of State Marco Rubio to meet Danish officials as Trump pushes Greenland initiative

Thread: Secretary of State Marco Rubio to meet Danish officials as Trump pushes Greenland ini

US Seeks Greenland Grab as Pursuit of Primacy Accelerates

US Seeks Greenland Grab as Pursuit of Primacy Accelerates

December 30, 2025 (NEO - Brian Berletic) - All under the guise of “pursuing peace” in a proxy war the US itself engineered and is for all intents and purposes fighting against Russia simply through its Ukrainian proxies, the US continues setting the stage for wider and more dangerous escalation - both in terms of expanding an emerging global maritime blockade against Russian, Iranian, and even Chinese maritime shipping, as well as in terms of preparing Europe to feed itself into Washington’s proxy war as Ukraine’s fighting capacity collapses.



US Seeks Greenland Grab as Pursuit of Primacy Accelerates

Continued (and now renewed) US interest in seizing Greenland from Denmark serves to accomplish both of these objectives.

A New Base for Wider Proxy War with Russia

Existing US military bases in Greenland are located closer to Moscow than any other US military base outside of mainland Europe (including Turkiye) and the UK.

Assuming that open US plans to have Europe “double down” on supporting Ukraine, including expanding military industrial production and arms shipments to Ukraine as well as preparing “European and non-European troops” to actually enter into Ukraine proceed, all under a US-led “division of labor,” US military facilities across mainland Europe and the UK would run the risk of dragging the US itself into any resulting Russian-European conflict.

This would defeat the purpose of this “division of labor.” Thus the US either reducing its military presence across mainland Europe and the UK or relocating essential operations to Greenland allows the US to provide close, but technically indirect support for European forces fighting Russia in the same way the US is currently providing close, but technically indirect support for Ukraine as it fights Russia.

Greenland could serve as a base of operations for continued and essential US ISR (intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) support, without which neither America’s Ukrainian nor its European proxies could effectively fight and successfully overextend Russia.

With the US operating outside of most of Europe, it could project the illusion of plausible deniability amid a Russian-European conflict enough to give itself and Russia the ability to avoid escalation into a direct US-Russian conflict - an escalation both Washington and Moscow presumably seek to avoid.

For the US, the entire purpose of waging this proxy war is to have US proxies pay the full cost of the conflict while the US enjoys the full benefits of it. For Moscow, the Ukraine conflict expanding into a European-Russian war backed by the US is still a lesser evil than a direct US-European-Russian war.

The US Preparing a Global Blockade

For years, prominent US corporate-financier funded think tanks have published policy papers planning blockades to strangle all peer and near-peer adversaries into submission. Chief among these adversaries is China.


A 2018 US Naval War College Review paper titled, “A Maritime Oil Blockade Against China,” describes not only a strategy to cut China off by imposing a maritime blockade, but examines all potential ways in which China would seek to circumvent such a blockade and proposes measures to take (which have since been implemented) to prevent China’s success in doing so.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) - a network of land routes that allow China to circumvent many of the key maritime chokepoints the US has invested decades of military expansion to threaten - is identified as one of these possible means of circumvention. The paper suggests targeting and destroying these routes, using the Myanmar-China oil pipeline as an example.

Since the paper was published, US-backed militants have actually begun physically targeting this pipeline (and more recently here). The paper itself suggests that amid any potential open US-China conflict, the US itself could conduct military strikes against such infrastructure.

US-backed militants have also attacked Chinese BRI infrastructure in Pakistan - particularly in Pakistan’s southwest Baluchistan region where US policymakers have sought to eliminate BRI projects since as early as 2011.

The 2018 paper also mentions Russia as a key partner of China, sharing a long land border and already exporting huge amounts of energy across it to China. Russia presents a formidable challenge to US plans to strangle China through maritime blockades. Since the 2018 paper was published the US has since begun its proxy war with Russia itself - and more specifically - targeting both Russian energy production itself and Russian energy exports.

Nominally “Ukrainian” maritime drones have begun targeting Russian energy exports far beyond just the Black Sea and have now carried out attacks in the Mediterranean Sea, the Caspian Sea, and even off the coast of West Africa.

The New York Times itself, in a March 2025 article titled, “The Partnership: The Secret History of the War in Ukraine,” would admit:

…the Biden administration had authorized helping the Ukrainians develop, manufacture and deploy a nascent fleet of maritime drones to attack Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. (The Americans gave the Ukrainians an early prototype meant to counter a Chinese naval assault on Taiwan.) First, the Navy was allowed to share points of interest for Russian warships just beyond Crimea’s territorial waters. In October, with leeway to act within Crimea itself, the C.I.A. covertly started supporting drone strikes on the port of Sevastopol.

The implication is that the US is both supplying the maritime drones being used to attack Russian vessels, as well as “supporting the drone strikes” themselves through deep CIA involvement. More recent “Ukrainian” maritime drone strikes far beyond the Black Sea are almost certainly the product of US support being only possible leveraging America’s global network of military and covert action facilities.


Not only do these strikes on Russian energy production undermine Russia’s own economic stability, it fulfills a primary objective in preparing the ground for a successful maritime blockade of China itself - eliminating or severely reducing Russia’s ability to support China in the event of a US-imposed blockade on China in coordination with strikes on China’s BRI infrastructure.
More alarming still are reports that the US’ current and widening covert and overt maritime blockade being carried out worldwide, has targeted ships bound for China - specifically off the coast of Venezuela in Latin America.

As the US ramps up covert/overt maritime seizures and blockades worldwide, the US expanding its presence in Greenland essentially “corks” the Russian-Chinese Northern Sea Route - a sea route that connects the Bering Strait to the Norwegian Sea via Arctic waters and has remained relatively out of reach of the US and its proxies.

Beyond simply examining maps and speculating about US motives, the current US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, has admitted that controlling Greenland is directly tied to controlling shipping lanes along the Arctic.

In a January 2025 interview published on the State Department’s official website, Secretary Rubio explicitly stated:

“…the Arctic Circle and the Arctic region is going to become critical for shipping lanes, for how you get some of this energy that’s going to be produced under President Trump – these energies rely on shipping lanes. The Arctic has some of the most valuable shipping lanes in the world. As some of the ice is melting, it’s become more and more navigable. We need to be able to defend that.

So if you project what the Chinese have done, it is just a matter of time before – because they are not an Arctic power. They do not have an Arctic presence, so they need to be able to have somewhere that they can stage from. And it is completely realistic to believe that the Chinese will eventually – maybe even in the short term – try to do in Greenland what they have done at the Panama Canal and in other places, and that is install facilities that give them access to the Arctic with the cover of a Chinese company but that in reality serve a dual purpose: that in a moment of conflict, they could send naval vessels to that facility and operate from there. And that is completely unacceptable to the national security of the world and to the United – to the security of the world and the national security of the United States.”

While Secretary Rubio attempts to frame US actions as responding to a supposed Chinese threat, the purpose is clearly to close off any potential alternative to the maritime chokepoints the US has already poised its military forces across the Asia-Pacific region to close.

The BBC in a more recent article cited US President Donald Trump and his specific mentioning of “Chinese and Russian ships as potential threats in the nearby seas.”

While theories abound of why the US is targeting Venezuela and Greenland - mainly centered on a US “retreat” from global hegemony - in reality the US is targeting both as part of an accelerated pursuit of Russia and China’s encirclement, containment, and ultimately, primacy. Not only does Venezuela factor into a growing global maritime blockade the US and its proxies are incrementally imposing, its elimination through military-imposed regime change further isolates its Russian, Chinese and also Iranian allies.

Greenland’s seizure by the US allows the US to not only expand its maritime blockade to target the Northern Sea Route, it also allows the US to fully implement its “division of labor” in Europe regarding its continued proxy war with Russia from a relatively safe distance.

Only time will tell whether or not Russia, China, and the rest of the aspiring multipolar world are able to counter these accelerated US ambitions or will be fooled by disingenuous “peace deals” and feints of a “retreat” to the Western Hemisphere. The sooner these US ambitions are exposed and checked, the sooner they can be stopped, and the less damage they are able to inflict on the world.

Brian Berletic is a Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer.

Land Destroyer: US Seeks Greenland Grab as Pursuit of Primacy Accelerates




777

The great Arctic heist: How a false flag over Greenland could trigger NATO’s collapse and fulfill a long-held expansionist fantasy

01/09/2026 // Lance D Johnson // 700 Views

Tags: annexation, Arctic, big government, chaos, conspiracy, Dangerous, Denmark, Europe, false-flag, geopolitics, Greenland, Igaliku Agreement, insanity, international law, land grab, military threat, national security, NATO, Pituffik Base, rare earth minerals, sovereignty, Trump, Twisted, United States, White House, World War III



Imagine a world where the rules no longer apply, where powerful nations can simply take what they want from their allies under the flimsiest of pretenses. This is the precarious reality being scripted by the White House as it openly threatens the peaceful, autonomous territory of Greenland. The recent declaration from White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt that military force is "always an option" for annexing Greenland is not an offhand remark. It is a calculated escalation, a public testing of boundaries that reveals a chilling endgame. When a world superpower discusses invading a peaceful ally to satisfy its own hunger for resources and strategic positioning, every citizen of the free world should pay attention. Why is the White House manufacturing a Russia-China crisis in the Arctic, when leaders in Denmark are saying that no threat exists? What dark event would need to be staged to justify such an unthinkable act of aggression and occupation against a NATO partner?Key points:

• White House press secretary Karine Leavitt confirmed military action is "always an option" for acquiring Greenland, labeling it a "national security priority."
• European allies, including France, Germany, and the UK, issued a unified statement with Denmark condemning the threat, warning it strikes at the heart of the NATO alliance.
• Greenland and Danish officials forcefully rejected the premise of the threat, denying exaggerated claims of foreign adversary activity and affirming that the island's future is for its people to decide.
• The 2004 Igaliku Agreement strictly limits U.S. military presence to Pituffik Space Base, making any unilateral expansion a clear treaty violation.
• Historical and current rhetoric frames Greenland as a resource-rich prize, with its rare earth minerals and new shipping lanes driving expansionist desires disguised as security concerns.

A manufactured crisis for a land grab

The sudden urgency from Washington regarding Greenland’s security is a fiction, a narrative carefully constructed to justify a power play. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen directly challenged the White House, stating, "We do not share this image that Greenland is plastered with Chinese investments." This so-called crisis is a classic tactic: create a problem where none exists, then offer a drastic, self-serving solution. The island, home to just 57,000 people who live in communities connected by boat and sled dog, not roads, is being portrayed as a hotbed of geopolitical intrigue. Why? Because beneath its massive ice sheet lie the keys to the future: vast reserves of rare earth minerals critical for everything from smartphones to missile systems. As the ice retreats, it unveils not just minerals but new sea lanes and oil reserves, turning a pristine Arctic landscape into a board game for globalists.
This is not about protection; it is about possession. For years, figures like Donald Trump have spoken openly about the "strategic and financial advantages" of owning Greenland, treating it like a real estate deal rather than a homeland with a 4,500-year-old Inuit culture. The people of Greenland, who govern their own internal affairs, have been clear. Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen dismissed the annexation talk as "fantasies." But when a giant declares its fantasies out loud and backs them with threats of military force, the world must listen.
The false flag blueprint and a treaty in the crosshairs

How does a nation justify attacking its ally? History provides the grim playbook: a staged provocation. A mysterious incident at or near the U.S.‘s sole military outpost on Greenland - Pituffik Space Base - could be the needed spark. An unexplained explosion, a cyber-attack blamed on a shadowy adversary, or a fabricated confrontation could be used to scream "security failure" and demand a massive, unilateral U.S. military escalation on the island. This would be a direct assault on the foundational agreement governing U.S. presence there: the 2004 Igaliku Agreement.
This treaty is the legal bedrock. It explicitly states that Pituffik (formerly Thule Air Base) is the only U.S. defense area in Greenland and that any proposed changes must be discussed with both Danish and Greenlandic authorities. A military move under the guise of an emergency would shred this agreement.
Former French prime minister Dominique de Villepin recognized the gravity, calling any U.S. attack a "red line for Europe." This is the ultimate betrayal: the strongest NATO power turning its guns on the territory of another member, all for control of resources and geography.
The stand for sovereignty and the future of the north

The unified roar from Europe in response to the White House’s musings is a rare and significant barrier. Leaders from across the continent stood with Denmark to stress that "Greenland belongs to its people." This is a line in the melting ice. The upcoming visit of French President Emmanuel Macron to Greenland on June 15, 2025, focused on Arctic security and climate, is a powerful counterpoint—a commitment to multilateralism and respect, not coercion.
The question now is whether the alliance will hold. Will European nations stand firm if a "crisis" is manufactured, or will they bow to the pressure of a partner gone rogue? The people of Greenland are caught in the middle, their peaceful existence and right to self-determination threatened by a distant power’s greed.
Their land, a place of the world’s purest air, home to the ancient Greenland shark and the vast silence of the ice cap, is not a commodity. It is a nation. The world must see this threat for what it is: not a legitimate policy discussion, but the opening move in a potential conspiracy to steal a country. The integrity of international law, the future of the Arctic, and the very soul of the Western alliance depend on calling out this plot and stopping it cold.
NATO and the US already has the capability to protect Greenland, so why the sudden urge to take it? If there is legitimate intel necessitating US occupation and ownership of Greenland, then the White House should divulge it and promise security and cooperation with their allies, not escalate plundering threats.
Sources include:
TheCradle.co
TheCradle.co
Enoch, Brighteon.ai

The Great Reset: Satan’s final push before Christ returns – NaturalNews.com