Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Debby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    206

    Sen. Jim DeMint wants to strike the Zvisas form the bill!

    I'm watching C-Span and Sen. Jim DeMint just introduced an
    ammendment to strike the Zvisas from the bill.

  2. #2
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    I thought Vitters introduced the amendment? Isn't Sen. DeMint just supporting it? I'm not actually watching it (have it on audio on computer), but it sounded like Vitters that introduced the amendment.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    2,892
    Kennedy would have a stroke if that passed. I can already hear him ranting and raving about it.

  4. #4
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    Mayday wrote:

    Kennedy would have a stroke if that passed. I can already hear him ranting and raving about it.
    It would be a deal breaker! I don't think it'll pass, but at least we'll know exactly who is and who isn't supporting amnesty.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5
    Senior Member SamLowrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    928
    Is anything passing? Is that good or bad?

    It COULD be good in that some of these measures seem more popular than the bill itself, so if they are not there Senators would have a reason to vote against the bill.

    What happened to the "English as Official Language" one?

  6. #6
    Debby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    206
    Quote Originally Posted by MW
    I thought Vitters introducted the amendment? Isn't Sen. DeMint just supporting it? I'm not actually watching it (have it on audio on computer), but it sounded like Vitters that introduced the amendment.
    Your right!! Vitters introduced it!! I was so impressed with DeMint's
    speech that forgot that. He said Zvisas were in effect amnesty!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Santa Clarita Ca
    Posts
    9,714
    For Immediate Release: May 24, 2007

    U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina)

    Contact: Wesley Denton (202) 228-5079



    DeMint Cosponsors Amendment to Bar Felons, Members of Terrorist Organizations, Gang Members and Sex Offenders from Legal Immigration Status and Benefits



    WASHINGTON D.C. - Today, U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina) announced that he has joined U.S. Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas), the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee's Immigration, Border Security and Citizenship subcommittee, in sponsoring an amendment to the immigration bill that will close a loophole to deny legal status and immigration benefits to members of terrorist-related organizations, known gang members, sex offenders, alien smugglers who use firearms and felony drunk drivers.



    "It's outrageous that this bill was drafted to allow gang members, sex offenders, and suspected terrorists to gain legal status," said Senator DeMint. "Just one week ago we were told this was a good bill that should be quickly passed by Congress, but the more we learn about it the worse it looks. Americans expect Congress to make national security our top priority, but we can't do that by allowing criminals and suspected terrorists to remain here legally."



    "The question I put to my colleagues is this: Should Congress permanently bar from the U.S. and from receiving any immigration benefit: suspected terrorists, gang members, sex offenders, felony drunk drivers, and other individuals who are a danger to society?," said Senator Cornyn. "I hope that every Senator would answer this question with a positive response."



    The amendment by Senators Cornyn and DeMint also closes the loophole in the pending bill that allows legalization of those illegal immigrants who have violated court ordered deportations, or absconders.



    "This bill not only rewards those who entered our country illegally, it grants amnesty to those who have defied court orders for deportation," said Senator DeMint. "Our willingness to look the other way has undermined the rule of law for the past twenty years, and this bill repeats that mistake."



    "Unlike the first half of my amendment, this is not a technical correction. In other words, the decision to legalize this population of illegal immigrants was not an oversight by those who drafted this ‘compromise' legislation," Senator Cornyn said. "Their decision was that Congress should allow exceptions for individuals who are illegally in the United States in defiance of a court order, as well as those individuals who have previously been deported from the United States pursuant to a court order and have again reentered illegally. I could not agree with this decision and I believe every member of the Senate should make clear where they stand on this matter. Congress has determined that each of these crimes is a felony. The laws are on the books, and we must make sure they are enforced."



    Below are examples of why the amendment by Senators Cornyn and DeMint is needed:



    Current law prohibits U.S. citizens convicted of sex crimes against minors from bringing a relative into this country. But, the bill does not specifically prohibit illegal immigrants - who could be removed from the country because they are sex offenders and failed to register as such - from entering the U.S. or getting legal status such as lawful permanent resident status.



    The bill retains a "loophole" in current law that would allow an alien who has been repeatedly convicted of driving while intoxicated to remain in the U.S. and get legal status such as "Z" visa status or a green card.



    The bill retains a "loophole" in current law that allows an alien who has committed terrorist acts or belongs to a terrorist organization and has not yet been removed from the U.S. to get legal status. Here is a real-world example of this loophole:



    Last year, Mohammed El Shorbagi pleaded guilty to providing material support to Hamas. His actions, however, would not specifically bar him from becoming a U.S. citizen or getting other immigration benefits - because it is not one of the grounds excluded from the definition of good moral character.



    Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said during recent immigration negotiations that illegal immigrants who have defied the U.S. court system do not deserve to be rewarded with legalization.


    http://campaignsandelections.com/sc/rel ... cfm?ID=751
    ###
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  8. #8
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    The amendment by Senators Cornyn and DeMint also closes the loophole in the pending bill that allows legalization of those illegal immigrants who have violated court ordered deportations, or absconders.
    This bill would cover the removal of Elvira Arellano (our Chicago sweetheart).

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •