Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 54

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #41
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,256
    Quote Originally Posted by enforcer1776
    Obama is an intelligent man. I dont think he acts like it and dont agree with 95% of his policies, but he is smart.

    Is he trying to start a civil war with the american people?

    He has lots of help he isn't in this alone...it might be the only way they can get control...


    Kathyet

  2. #42
    xfilerdiane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    15
    yes obama is smart enough to follow the orders that are given to him

  3. #43
    xfilerdiane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    15
    Obama is the puppet for the Rothschild's and rockefellers . Notice he cant even remember his own speeches as in an actor that needs a teleprompter. hie is just the messenger. No I don't think a civil war is good because of all the anti patriot laws they will throw you in jail for treason.

  4. #44
    xfilerdiane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    15
    Kathyet, The only way I get my info is from the republican radio stations and online. This is why they want to take the Internet away. They know we can be strong with this access. I wish the tea party would get more involved or there was some other organization in every city that didn't depend on the internet just in case its taken away

  5. #45
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,256
    Were all in the same boat...if they pass this net neutrality thing who knows what will happen...

    All I can say is there is a big push to do this before the new year begins...and the republicans are on board...other wise none of these things would get passed...




    Kathyet

  6. #46
    xfilerdiane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    15
    notice they pull all this crap right before Christmas when all the people are out trying to enjoy the holiday and even notice Harry Reid pulled that on a Saturday.. the extent they will go to to get their agenda in place is becoming scary.

  7. #47
    Senior Member enforcer1776's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Delaware.
    Posts
    202
    why the hell are republicans helping with stuff that will hurt them ( like the dream act) in the long run this net neutrality crap is censorship period
    <div>"If I had known this I would have picked my own cotton"</div>

  8. #48
    Senior Member enforcer1776's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Delaware.
    Posts
    202
    and the swami says,. You heard it here first

    All of the following 19 Members of the Democratic Caucus provided a big fat amnesty target for Republican challengers in 2012:

    * (Calif.) Feinstein ( will win because the illegals have overrun the state)
    * (Conn.) Lieberman (I dont see him losing but maybe 30% chance)
    * (Dela.) Carper ( i personally want to challenge him but cant afford 10k for the primary for the democratic party of which i am a member)
    * (Fla.) Bill Nelson ( i think with rubio this cat might be in real trouble)
    * (Hawaii) Akaka ( i dont see him losing)
    * (Md.) Cardin ( i dont see him losing maryland is a blue as delaware)
    * (Mich.) Stabenow ( i think she stands about a 50% chance of losing unless their is voter fraud)
    * (Minn.) Klobuchar ( i would call her a toss up)
    * (Mo.) McCaskill ( she i toast unless the conservative base stays home)
    * (N.D.) Conrad ( i think he is toast)
    * (N.J.) Menendez ( maybe 40% chance he will lose)
    * (N.M.) Bingaman ( i dont know enough about the state)
    * (Ohio) Sherrod Brown ( i think he is gone with recent trends in the state)
    * (Pa.) Casey ( his name will be the only thing that saves him)
    * (R.I.) Whitehouse ( yankees dont appreciate enforcement because it dont effect them so he is safe proably)
    * (Va.) Webb ( unless the black bounce helps him he is gone.
    * (Vt.) Sanders (Independent) ( see whitehouse)
    * (Wash.) Cantwell ( see whitehouse)
    * (Wis.) Kohl ( after feingold lost i think this guy is toast and told the office that when i called to tell them to vote no)
    <div>"If I had known this I would have picked my own cotton"</div>

  9. #49
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Minneapolis MN
    Posts
    378
    I still think the best security for 2012 is getting a bill out there early 2011 that requires valid citizenship proof to register to vote. Lock away the potential illegal votes and we may win a couple more areas.

    Just dunno how to get that sort of legislation started. Wonder on the possibility of getting it snuck into one of the major spending bills in some manner at the start of the year.

  10. #50
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Minneapolis MN
    Posts
    378
    Whats also the negative hype about the net neutrality bill? I haven't been able to see it anywhere to read it however I was a supporter of this in the infancy stage. The original goal and as far as I know is just making it illegal for internet providers to limit certain traffic more then others. Such as cable providers slowing bandwidth to netflix and other legal streaming media content which they say is to keep people who overuse playing fair which is really them trying to hurt fair competition over the net.

    Whats in this bill that is bad for the public?

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •