Results 41 to 50 of 54
Thread: Senate Vote on Dream Act
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
12-20-2010, 05:11 PM #41Guest
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 9,256
Originally Posted by enforcer1776
He has lots of help he isn't in this alone...it might be the only way they can get control...
Kathyet
-
12-20-2010, 05:12 PM #42
-
12-20-2010, 05:20 PM #43
Obama is the puppet for the Rothschild's and rockefellers . Notice he cant even remember his own speeches as in an actor that needs a teleprompter. hie is just the messenger. No I don't think a civil war is good because of all the anti patriot laws they will throw you in jail for treason.
-
12-20-2010, 05:24 PM #44
Kathyet, The only way I get my info is from the republican radio stations and online. This is why they want to take the Internet away. They know we can be strong with this access. I wish the tea party would get more involved or there was some other organization in every city that didn't depend on the internet just in case its taken away
-
12-20-2010, 05:28 PM #45Guest
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 9,256
Were all in the same boat...if they pass this net neutrality thing who knows what will happen...
All I can say is there is a big push to do this before the new year begins...and the republicans are on board...other wise none of these things would get passed...
Kathyet
-
12-20-2010, 05:44 PM #46
notice they pull all this crap right before Christmas when all the people are out trying to enjoy the holiday and even notice Harry Reid pulled that on a Saturday.. the extent they will go to to get their agenda in place is becoming scary.
-
12-20-2010, 11:41 PM #47
why the hell are republicans helping with stuff that will hurt them ( like the dream act) in the long run this net neutrality crap is censorship period
<div>"If I had known this I would have picked my own cotton"</div>
-
12-20-2010, 11:52 PM #48
and the swami says,. You heard it here first
All of the following 19 Members of the Democratic Caucus provided a big fat amnesty target for Republican challengers in 2012:
* (Calif.) Feinstein ( will win because the illegals have overrun the state)
* (Conn.) Lieberman (I dont see him losing but maybe 30% chance)
* (Dela.) Carper ( i personally want to challenge him but cant afford 10k for the primary for the democratic party of which i am a member)
* (Fla.) Bill Nelson ( i think with rubio this cat might be in real trouble)
* (Hawaii) Akaka ( i dont see him losing)
* (Md.) Cardin ( i dont see him losing maryland is a blue as delaware)
* (Mich.) Stabenow ( i think she stands about a 50% chance of losing unless their is voter fraud)
* (Minn.) Klobuchar ( i would call her a toss up)
* (Mo.) McCaskill ( she i toast unless the conservative base stays home)
* (N.D.) Conrad ( i think he is toast)
* (N.J.) Menendez ( maybe 40% chance he will lose)
* (N.M.) Bingaman ( i dont know enough about the state)
* (Ohio) Sherrod Brown ( i think he is gone with recent trends in the state)
* (Pa.) Casey ( his name will be the only thing that saves him)
* (R.I.) Whitehouse ( yankees dont appreciate enforcement because it dont effect them so he is safe proably)
* (Va.) Webb ( unless the black bounce helps him he is gone.
* (Vt.) Sanders (Independent) ( see whitehouse)
* (Wash.) Cantwell ( see whitehouse)
* (Wis.) Kohl ( after feingold lost i think this guy is toast and told the office that when i called to tell them to vote no)<div>"If I had known this I would have picked my own cotton"</div>
-
12-21-2010, 12:04 AM #49Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- Minneapolis MN
- Posts
- 378
I still think the best security for 2012 is getting a bill out there early 2011 that requires valid citizenship proof to register to vote. Lock away the potential illegal votes and we may win a couple more areas.
Just dunno how to get that sort of legislation started. Wonder on the possibility of getting it snuck into one of the major spending bills in some manner at the start of the year.
-
12-21-2010, 12:09 AM #50Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- Minneapolis MN
- Posts
- 378
Whats also the negative hype about the net neutrality bill? I haven't been able to see it anywhere to read it however I was a supporter of this in the infancy stage. The original goal and as far as I know is just making it illegal for internet providers to limit certain traffic more then others. Such as cable providers slowing bandwidth to netflix and other legal streaming media content which they say is to keep people who overuse playing fair which is really them trying to hurt fair competition over the net.
Whats in this bill that is bad for the public?


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote
NYC Democrat Socialist Candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier Wants...
06-22-2026, 08:08 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports