Thread: Some Ted Kennedy info

Would someone please tell me why this man is involved in very immigration bill and why we should believe him today???

~~~~~~~~

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/eibess ... guest.html

He was involved in the Hart-Seller Immigration Bill 1965
"Our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, the bill will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia -- and in the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think."

~~~~~~

http://www.rightwingnews.com/mt331/2007 ... edy_on.php
Ted Kennedy on Immigration
1965: "The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs."
1986: "This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this."
2007: "Now it is time for action. 2007 is the year we must fix our broken system."

~~~~~
http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Ted_Kennedy.htm

Voted YES on establishing a Guest Worker program. (May 2006)
Voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security. (May 2006)
Voted YES on giving Guest Workers a path to citizenship. (May 2006)
Voted NO on allowing more foreign workers into the US for farm work. (Jul 199
Voted NO on visas for skilled workers. (May 199
Voted NO on limit welfare for immigrants. (Jun 1997)

Would someone please tell me WHY this man is still in office? I can't believe he gets re-elected over and over again.

He is and has always ridden on the tail of his brothers. He is worthless . . .always has been . . . always will be.