Thread: Some ways to fight back

Don't let our opponents define us. They will label us xenophobes,protectionists,racsists,etc. Whether one is,or not,is wholly and utterly irrelevent in this debate. Both sides can claim extremes,and everything in between. From now on,if we are labeled,reply,"Whatever!'and stay on point and on offense. So many have lost life or limb protecting our way of life. The very least we can do is to be willing to endure the shear horror of being called names.
Labeling us is their most powerful weapon. Disarm them of their P.C. arsenals and self-rightous arrogence and they have nothing left,for we all know that,if your argument rings hollow,attack,attack,attack!
Finally,quit using the term,"illegal immigration". Replace it with "massive"or "unchecked" immigration,or something to that effect. The reason is because our opponents will/can reply(in debate or in policy)"Fine,then we'll just make em' legal and/or raise the limits,etc.
Ask yourself,is the culture we grew up in worth preserving or not? And are we willing to be called names and maybe lose a few freinds to preserve and protect it?

Welcome HotRodTim!

That was a great suggestion to say "unchecked" instead of illegal. This will also apply to thousands and thousands of people who overstayed their legal entry. Then they can't say "no one is 'illegal'" and they can't say it's not massive or unchecked.

Welcome to Alipac. We are doing our best to educate each other and call American and other traitors to the table. There is hope here.

How about unlawful immigration?

That gets at more of what the problem is -- a breach of our laws.

Trying to "pretty it up" doesn't work.
Undocumented workers, migrants or whatever you want to call them , they are still ILLEGAL ALIENS and it is still ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.
Call me raciest or anything you want to but the truth is the truth.
They are here illegally. And they are criminals for being so.

Lately, I just refer to it as an 'invasion'. You are so right though. Every time I bring up anything about this, I am called a racist and attacked by many.

If I am labeled a racist because I believe in the rule of law then so be it.. The only thing that hurt my feelings was when I returned from Viet Nam in 68 and was labeled a baby killer , was spat on and had things thrown at me ...

My feeling can no longer be hurt !! !

Welcome HotrodTim !
When people look at me that way, I tell them I am a patriot Most people around my area agree with me though...

Welcome to alipac "hotrodtim" even though I don't agree with you i am glad you have joined in. Everyones Ideas are important here and just because I disagree it doesn't mean I am right, it is only my point of view.


They tryed it with we are "Protectionist" also, my reply was I am proud to be a protectionist, anyone who is willing to do all they can to protect their familys, towns and country deserves the label!!

They are still illegal aliens, that is the name that irritates them the most...why because it is true, I don't care how hard you try you can not change the definition of it.

Also if we change now they win on the PC issue again.

I also have noticed myself lately, instead of calling them illegal aliens I have more often than not been calling them illegal immigrants which says to me I also have been being brain washed and not even aware of it.

I use the term "imvasion by foreign Nationals.
I do not reprint pro illegal articles until I re-edit them to say illegal alien and then I take out the ending paragraph, which always ends on a soft pro-illegal note.
I often get upset when I see people re-posting NYT articles without editorial comment.

if you are re=posting an article from a pro-illegal media source then do make a comment on what a load of slanted crap it is!

I in no way remotely endorse Political correctness and/or changing the name/classification of the illegal immigrants. P.C. is nothing less than Orwellian newspeak and I despise it. What I meant is that our opponents can use the term against us in that they can legalize millions and/or make it easier to become legal and simply say,"Well,they're not illegal>"
My point is that I am worried about the fact that the open borders elite want to grow our country by 100-120 million people(excluding the birth/death ratio) by the year 2050. I do not want my children to have to live in a country of 420 million people and all the infrastructure that this would require. Not to mention cultural and quality of life issues. With all the other'plans"in the works this would make for a nightmarish scenario!
Finally, I meant that ,in my humble opinion,the shear numbers should be reduced. Both illegal and legal. Our way of life(and yes this can be defined)depends on the numbers being managed and limited by the grace of the American people. It is our government,our country and our borders.
Are the desires and will and birthright of a person born here inherently more relevant and important than somone,in another country,that may decide to come here seven years from now?