Results 11 to 11 of 11
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
06-07-2017, 07:53 PM #11
Convention of States gang panhandles misrepresentation of a Jefferson letter
Yup! That’s right. Go to conventionofstates.com AND YOU WILL FIND under Endorsements, “The Jefferson Statement”.
Now, for those interested, see Convention of States Falsifies Thomas Jefferson’s Advice
”Recently Citizens for Self-Governance (CSG) held what they called a “simulated” convention to fool America. Rita Dunaway, Special Counsel to CSG and Utah Representative Ken Ivory, chairman of the “convention” sent an email to the “actors” after the filming ended. Ms. Dunaway wrote the email, embedding a note from Rep. Ivory that reads in part, “As Thomas Jefferson counseled this‘must be done by the states themselves, erecting such barriers at the constitutional line as cannot be surmounted’….”
The accurate message can be found in a letter from Thomas Jefferson To Archibald Stuart written December 23, 1791, which reads in part, “Then it is important to strengthen the state governments: and as this cannot be done by any change in the federal constitution, (for the preservation of that is all we need contend for,) it must be done by the states themselves, erecting such barriers at the constitutional line as cannot be surmounted either by themselves or by the general government. The only barrier in their power is a wise government….”[emphasis added.]
Rep. Ivory reversed Jefferson’s message to mean that an Article V convention was what he meant as such a barrier. This is not true. Jefferson clearly meant that strengthening state governments can not be done by amending the Constitution, but rather by the states maintaining a wise and able government.”
To read Jefferson’s letter CLICK HERE
The more we check, the more we find those behind calling a Convention not only make stuff up, but have nefarious motives as well.
JWK
Chief Justice, Warren Burger, stated in 1988, “I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the Convention if we don’t like the agenda. The meeting in 1787 ignored the limit placed by the Confederation Congress ‘for the sole and express purpose.’ “
Similar Threads
-
Mexican Government 'Regrets' Texas Gov. Greg Abbott Signing Border Security Law
By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 8Last Post: 06-15-2015, 03:33 PM -
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and wife, $104 federal income tax bill, $19,000 refund
By JohnDoe2 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 1Last Post: 04-30-2015, 03:50 AM -
Greg Abbott, Scott Walker to Tour Texas-Mexico Border
By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 4Last Post: 03-28-2015, 12:22 AM -
Confirmed: Why Yes, a Texas Voting Machine DID Leave Greg Abbott Off the Ballot
By kathyet2 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 11-08-2014, 08:58 PM -
Greg Abbott Promises to Secure Texas-Mexico Border
By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 1Last Post: 06-07-2014, 12:09 AM
Hotel Quietly Converted Into Migrant Shelter In Up-And-Coming...
04-29-2024, 08:52 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports