Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    JadedBaztard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    639

    TX:This won't work (editorial)

    http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/editorial/16453744.htm

    This won't help
    Star-Telegram
    Posted on Mon, Jan. 15, 2007

    The federal government maintains, as it should, primary responsibility for developing and enforcing immigration law.

    But state and local officials -- sometimes motivated by frustration with federal foot-dragging, sometimes by baser instincts -- increasingly are proposing restrictions designed to drive off illegal immigrants by making their lives more difficult.

    Ostensibly, these changes in the law might save taxpayer money. However, many of these measures are impractical and shortsighted and carry immediate and long-term costs.

    One example is the proposal (HB 39) by Rep. Ken Paxton, R-McKinney, to bar Texas high school graduates from receiving in-state college tuition rates if they're illegal immigrants -- even if they otherwise meet the requirements for the lower charges.

    The main arguments for such restrictions are that law-breakers shouldn't be rewarded and that taxpayers shouldn't invest in students who can't work legally in this country. The reality is that many of the young people who would be affected didn't choose to come to the United States -- they were brought by parents. And most who fall within the confines of the 2001 Texas law that Paxton would change (they've lived in the state for at least three years and earned a diploma or its equivalent) consider this country their home and would correct their legal status if there were a mechanism for doing so.

    The fact that they are diligently pursuing their education indicates a desire to be productive members of society. Erecting barriers for them wouldn't curb illegal immigration in any meaningful way -- or serve Texas' future well.

    Here are some other problematic proposals:

    HB 28 by Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler would (as originally filed) deny any state or local government benefits -- including loans, professional licenses, jobs, healthcare, disability assistance, public schooling, college instruction or food stamps -- to anyone born in the state whose parents are illegal immigrants.

    Berman plans to remove healthcare and education from the list, but it's still poorly drafted in terms of who is covered. Under the U.S. Constitution, anyone born in Texas is a U.S. citizen. Denying some citizens benefits available to others, without a compelling reason, could run into equal-protection problems.

    HB 29, also by Berman, would require businesses that transmit money abroad for customers to levy a special 8 percent fee on funds sent to Mexico or Central and South America. The fees would be deposited with the controller and credited to an account supporting indigent healthcare. Legal residents could apply for refunds.

    Finding a source to help with the costs of indigent healthcare is a noble concern. But why should this fee not also be charged to illegal immigrants sending money to Canada, Ireland, China, Japan, Vietnam, Russia and other locations? There's more than a tinge of racism in requiring a select group of legal residents making legal transactions to be burdened with paying and then going through the refund process.

    HB 38 by Burt Solomons, R-Carrollton, would require anyone applying for a business, occupational or professional license or renewing such as license to prove employment eligibility by showing one or more documents from a long list that includes passports, birth certificates, naturalization certificates, legal resident cards, photo driver's licenses, government-issued photo IDs and Social Security cards.

    It makes sense that those applying for government-issued professional licenses should be able to prove identity. However, if applicants fail to show documentation, will they merely be turned away, or will state workers then be expected to become immigration enforcers?

    State lawmakers could expend great amounts of time and energy on divisive debate that accomplishes little beyond playing to vocal constituencies. But individual measures designed to make it undesirable, if not onerous, to stay in Texas are unlikely to address the problems of illegal immigration.

    Progress will require comprehensive federal legislation that takes into account work-force needs but curbs employer abuses of the system and deals with families in a humane, realistic and fiscally responsible way.
    What planet is this writer on?????
    "sometimes by baser instincts -- increasingly are proposing restrictions designed to drive off illegal immigrants by making their lives more difficult.

    Ostensibly, these changes in the law might save taxpayer money. However, many of these measures are impractical and shortsighted and carry immediate and long-term costs.'
    And I love the fact that there is no name attached to the editorial! This was published in the print edition as well. So it is my "BASER INSTINCTS" that drive me to not want these invaders??? I don't want to "make their lives more difficult", I WANT THEM OUT OF MY COUNTRY!!!!!!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    778
    They can call us racist and short-sighted. Can we call them ignorant and anti-American?
    THE POOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT IN MY AVATAR CROSSED OVER THE WRONG BORDER FENCE!!!

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,663
    I don't give a rat's pooper whether the children of illegals came here of their own accord. They are foreign nationals and should not be stealing benefits paid for by Americans for Americans. If they don't like it, maybe they should take up the discussion with their damned illegal parents. What's more, I don't even want the little scofflaws in our public schools, and I look forward to the day that some judge has the moral rectitude and intestinal fortitude to reverse the absurd activist decision that guaranteed them an education on our dime in the first place.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072
    The Star Telegram has gone illegal immigration liberal on us this week.

    It's full of this crap.

    They need to save that for their Spanish newspaper la Estrella.

    http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/16464158.htm
    Farmers Branch residents take sides
    Evil people out to get immigrants...

    http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/legisla ... 463931.htm
    Lawmakers propose a variety of solutions
    It sparks fears...

    http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/columni ... 453137.htm
    Italian food, Mexican cash and American indignation
    Pesso Pizza defense...

    http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/columni ... 444718.htm
    Meatpacker raids prove that immigration woes aren't baloney
    "consequences for arrested workers and their families."

    The Liberal Press is Working Overtime!

    Dixie
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    JadedBaztard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    639
    I noticed that too, lately they have gone into hyperdrive in defense of the sneaky little illegalses.

    Hey Dixie, Isn't La Estrella given out FREE????

  6. #6
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072
    TRant,

    I call them criminals, their attorneys, people that help them get away with it and those that write about it.

    Jaded,

    Yea, it's a free rag. Your right, the illegal aliens suporters are in hyper drive right now. They are pushing in the first 100 days. They are bouncing off the walls here in Fort Worth. It's like watching a flea circus.

    They just can't seen to get it through their thick skulls that they are not the Majority that Rules.

    Dixie
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #7
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    CrocketsGhost wrote:

    I don't even want the little scofflaws in our public schools, and I look forward to the day that some judge has the moral rectitude and intestinal fortitude to reverse the absurd activist decision that guaranteed them an education on our dime in the first place.
    Honestly, I'm amazed that the Supreme Court findings in Plyer vs. Doe (1982) has not been successfully challenged to this date.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  8. #8
    JadedBaztard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    639
    Dang! This would be funny if it were not so freakin sad and WRONG! Not only do my taxes pay for their food, education, etc. but now I realize that my newspaper subscription pays for them to have a FREE newspaper printed in their language so they can read about their 6th anchor baby's birth announcement in La Estrella! I'm going to go throw up now.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072
    Welcome to the realization that you are at Ground Zero.

    Dixie
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  10. #10
    April
    Guest
    Dixie wrote:

    TRant,

    I call them criminals, their attorneys, people that help them get away with it and those that write about it.

    Jaded,

    Yea, it's a free rag. Your right, the illegal aliens suporters are in hyper drive right now. They are pushing in the first 100 days.

    They just can't seen to get it through their thick skulls that they are not the Majority that Rules.
    There is a whole alliance of people that illegal immigration beneifits so there is always going to be some rag or paid off yellow journalist that will try to promote and defend it. The American majority needs to become united in the same way this alliance of corruption and greed has and kick some Butt!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •