Thread: US Whites Under the Demographic Gun

US Whites Under the Demographic Gun

May 5, 2011

Invasion by im-migration, is an old age practice. Illegal immigration is designed to further concentrate political power in the hands of the Elite and their agents, the "regressive" Left.

by Andrew Lanyard

Last year when I worked for the US Census Bureau, I privately objected to its policy of counting Illegal aliens, without identifying them as such.

This meant that illegals will be counted when apportioning representation in Congress. States with lots of illegals (such as Texas) will gain seats. But Northern states like mine, with relatively few, will lose. This has proven true in the latest redistribution of seats.

TEXAS

The states that picked up seats were all in the South and West. Texas was the biggest winner, picking up 4 seats on an increase in population of 4.3 million.

You might think this means a more "conservative" Congress. But the face of Teas has changed. The white (or "Anglo") population of Texas is about 47 percent. Hispanics are now 37 percent and growing fast. Many are immigrants -- both legal and illegal. Blacks make up 12 percent and Asians about 4 percent

Steve Murdock, a former US Census Bureau director, says about 6 percent of the state's population is "not documented." He means they're illegal.

That 6 percent is sure to be an under count. Government officials and the media always put the number of illegal aliens in the US at 11 or 12 million. Reliable sources in the business and academic worlds put the figure at 20 million or more.

So the gain in Texas's population -- and representation -- is due to the growth of its Hispanic population, which in turn is fueled by immigration, both legal and illegal.

What about the future? The following fact tells us all we need to know.

Two-thirds of Texas school children are now non-Anglo. And it is conservatively estimated that the percentage of white school children will drop by 2040 from the present 33 percent to 20 percent.

The handwriting is on the wall. The Anglo population of Texas is aging and dying; the Hispanic population is young and growing, and will soon be a majority.

THE REST OF THE NATION

The decline of the native American population (both white and black) is most pronounced in the Northeast and Midwest.

States such as Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Illinois had only small gains in population, and these gains were attributable to immigration. (Despite immigration, Michigan suffered a total loss in population.) All these states lost seats in Congress.

In 1965, the year Ted Kennedy's revolutionary immigration bill (which favored immigration from the third world) became law, whites made up over 85 percent of the population; Blacks made up a majority of the balance.

By 1990, however, the white percentage had dropped to 76 percent. It is now 66.4 percent.

But if you look at the white population by age groups, whites were 81 percent of the total population age 65 and over, etc., down to whites being only 56 percent of all Americans who are under age 10. This shows the trend, which culminates with whites expected to be less than half of all births this year.

Blacks at 12-13 percent have now been replaced as America's largest minority by Hispanics at 16 percent. This is because Hispanics increased by 43 percent in just the past 10 years.

We're talking fertility rates here, as well as immigration. The replacement level for a population is 2.1 children. Whites now have on average 1.847 children; blacks have 2.02, and Hispanics have 2.82.

This year it is estimated that for the first time minorities will account for more than half of all American births.

In another 10 years, it is estimated it will be more than 60 percent.

www.2010census.gov/2010census/data

QUO VADIS?

It's easy to see where this train is headed. In some states (e.g., Texas and California) whites are already a minority. Before long, that will be true for America as a whole.

We'll be a nation composed of competing minorities. Is that so bad? Isn't it "racist" to regret that whites will soon be a minority in the US?

It's not an issue of race in the usual sense. The historian Oswald Spengler decried what he called the "zoological" concept of race. He said that race is a cultural creation. A race is a group of people who are imbued with the same spirit, who are shaped by common cultural ideals. A race may be made up of peoples from many different biological patrimonies.

In "The Hour of Decision" (a book that made Spengler persona non grata to the National Socialists), he said that what is needed is not a pure race, but a strong one.

Unfortunately, today more and more immigrants (legal as well as illegal) have cultural values (moral, religious, political) that are radically different from those of traditional America or the Christian West.

Most of the illegal immigrants -- and some of the legal -- are characterized by disproportionate levels of crime, disease, illiteracy and unemployment.

They are overwhelming the schools, hospitals and prisons of many states -- adding to the already great fiscal burdens of those states.

More and more, these immigrants have no interest in assimilating. And less and less is there a solid core to assimilate to,

CONCLUSION

What are the prospects? One is racial tension. It may not be an all-out war -- just a simmering state of mutual hostility with periodic outbreaks -- which will require an increasingly overt police state to manage.

Another is the break-up of America. There is talk of secession, and racial tension (as well as federal intrusion) is driving it. But it's unlikely that secession will succeed. Instead, America may Balkanize on a de facto level, with each region or enclave struggling to protect its own culture.

Or -- perhaps most likely -- America may simply decline into an apathetic stew of rootless peoples, ruled by an elite cosmopolitan class. When people are deracinated, divided and demoralized, they are easier to control.

This elite class, which dominates our institutions, which pushes relentlessly for open borders and uncontrolled immigration, are themselves controlled by a small, largely invisible oligarchy.

This oligarchy -- though disproportionately Jewish -- is not racial in the biological sense. Rather it's a cultural race, in Spengler's sense: strongly hereditary, but drawing its membership from dynastic families that are both Jewish and Gentile.

What makes it a race is its covert initiation into an occult Luciferian religion -- one that despises the traditional Jew and the Christian. The members of this oligarchy see themselves as the Lords of the Earth.

They seek to destroy America (and not just America, but Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Britain, and Europe, as well as any nation that dares to preserve its identity and independence.)

They use many means to do so. But one of the most effective is demographic -- because, like small doses of poison, it is slow and rarely produces a shock of recognition, but is ultimately lethal.

Nations can survive economic collapse or military defeat. But they cannot survive demographic destruction. We are dying, and seem only half aware of it. If we do not fight back, if we do not counteract this poison soon, America and the West will die.

http://www.henrymakow.com/demographic_destruction.html

Ending birthright citizenship is imperative for the survival of America as we know it. The rapid demographic change in this country is being fueled by births to illegal aliens and paid for by American taxpayers.

Originally Posted by hattiecat

Ending birthright citizenship is imperative for the survival of America as we know it. The rapid demographic change in this country is being fueled by births to illegal aliens and paid for by American taxpayers.

I couldn't agree more.

Originally Posted by Oldglory

Originally Posted by hattiecat

Ending birthright citizenship is imperative for the survival of America as we know it. The rapid demographic change in this country is being fueled by births to illegal aliens and paid for by American taxpayers.

I couldn't agree more.

The overwhelming, irresponsible reproducing ( mod edit) is courtesy of a population with no education, control or responsibility for any of their actions.

Since the majority of the aforementioned pay no taxes, I wonder how wonderful their birthrate inheritance of this country will be without tax payers to fund their free ride.

As far as "Luciferian" goes, in the end the Bible says that Jesus Christ will defeat the Antichrist, so the elect Jew and the elect Christian shall have the last laugh. But I haven't heard of that happening yet, I've been hearing of "secular humanists" (a type of athiest, most of them are ex-Jews) and Big Business trying to take over and create a NWO, not the Antichrist yet in this point in time.

I feel that we should do away with "multiculturalism" concerning cultures that were not birthed on U.S. soil. The pan-European mainstream culture and the African-American culture were birthed on U.S. soil, and the indigenous cultures of the 50 states preceeded the creation of the U.S. but their territories exsist nowhere else and they preceeded us, so theirs should be protected as well. Minor cultures that exist because of religion (such as the Amish) should be protected as long as it does not represent a threat to Americans' physical safety or freedom, such as a cult (Waco, Jonestown, etc.) or Islamic terrorists. Regional cultures (South, Midwest, Yankee, etc.) should also be protected. Hispanic culture in the Americas resulted as the first Europeans came to conquer other peoples, and it is neither an indigneous culture nor was it initially started on U.S. soil, it is not a special religious group, plus there is a direct competition from that culture to actually challenge all other cultures in America, especially the mainstream white one. Hispanics as a whole do not assimilate to the mainstream the way most immigrants of the past have, and at least maintaining the mainstream culture as dominant if not the ethnic group that mostly represents the mainstream culture as the dominant group, is crucial if the U.S. that the world knows as the U.S. is to survive. Yet many Hispanics are envisioning a "remake" of the U.S. beyond mere cosmetic changes, they're talking about a brand new Latin American nation as well as making their numbers the majority. I feel it's challenge enough to have a nation go from one ethnic group majority to another within one person's lifetime (80 years), especially when that group was never really a part of genuine American culture, and it's downright cruel to allow that new replacing group just do away with the pre-existing culture(s) and language and proclaim the rest of us either assimilate to them or that we have no place in the world to act like ourselves. It's an outrage!!

Hispanics need to assimilate to the degree that other immigrant groups of the past have assimilated. No two immigrants are alike, you can tell their ancestry to a certain degree, but the Americanness overshadows everything so you see "American" (what we all have in common) in their culture more than you can see where their ancesters came from.

If we must destroy America, at least give it back to the original indigneous peoples-but don't give it to America's competition!!

Sacredrage, Very well! said re: indigenous cultures here in America and to whom America should really belong to as a whole. Latin-American cultures are just that - Latin. As you said, they do not as a whole, assimilate well. They have their own vast central and south America to live in. They do not need a whole continent!

Japan and South Korea have lower birth rates than Anglo Americans yet they are not becoming overwhelmed by immigrants.

Originally Posted by GFC

Japan and South Korea have lower birth rates than Anglo Americans yet they are not becoming overwhelmed by immigrants.

That's because countries like Japan and Korea are allowed to maintain and even promote being a homogeneous society. Nobody demands these countries accept millions of third-world immigrants into said countries to upset the racial balance.

If multiculturalism and diversity made a country "stronger" then how come countries like Japan and Korea, to name only a few, have not opened up their borders to embrace it? How come these countries are not called “racistâ€

Hispanics are the majority in 22 countries on the Western Hemisphere. Just how many more nations do they feel they need to conquer and become the majority in? Yet we are the racists ones?

Wonder how long the Hispanics would take to cry "unfair" at the prospect of a foreign ethnic group becoming the dominant number in their countries and foreign culture and language replacing theirs as what defines their countries? I wonder how long they would put up with the idea that, since they aren't the original people, culture and language in their lands (coming into creation because one people colonized and oppressed other peoples) that they themselves deserve to be colonized and oppressed by yet another people? I'm not downplaying the evil of what happened centuries ago to innocent people here and below the border, I'm just saying it's not moral to punish people for things they themselves did not do and don't even support just because they happen to be born in the colonized land and of a certain ethnic group-we are all individuals. Yet this is what is being done to the American people. And not even the Native Americans would be left alone in peace in the end should seperatist Hispanics become the dominant number and culture here.