Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member stevetheroofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    somewhere near Mexico I reckon!
    Posts
    9,681

    Visa Bill Would Pave Way for More Mexicans to Make US Home

    Visa Bill Would Pave Way for More Mexicans to Make US Home
    Written By Elizabeth Llorente Published November 30, 2011 Fox News Latino


    The House measure to expand the number of family visas for relatives of U.S. residents hoping to make the U.S. home is expected to benefit, among others, Mexicans, who often wait roughly 10 years for permission to live here.

    Under a measure approved by the House Tuesday, with a 389-15 vote, family-based visa limits rise from 7 percent per country to 15 percent per country, an adjustment that could slightly ease the backlog for naturalized citizens, particularly from Mexico and the Philippines, trying to bring relatives into the United States.

    The majority of immigrants in the United States are admitted through family-based visas. Mexicans account for about 30 percent of the U.S. immigrant population – that includes Mexicans of all immigration status – and nearly all Mexicans who are granted U.S. permanent residency, known casually as having a "green card," are admitted into the country on family-based visas.

    Almost 60 percent of Mexicans admitted into the United States were immediate relatives sponsored by U.S. citizens, about 35 percent were non-immediate relatives.

    Immediate relatives of a U.S. citizens include a spouse, unmarried children under 21 years of age, or the parent of someone who is at least 21. Visas for these categories typically are not subject to caps.

    So-called family preference immigrant visas are subject to caps, and that can affect the length of time between the day a U.S. citizen or U.S. resident submits a petition for admission to the United States, and the day that person ultimately may get admitted. These visas are subject to caps, and are the ones that would change under the House bill, which next will go to the Senate for a vote.

    These visas cover such relatives as sons and daughters, over the age of 21, of U.S. citizens; spouses and minor children of legal U.S. permanent residents; and brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens, among others.

    The legislation was hailed by people on different sides of the immigration debate as a rare example of bipartisan accord on immigration, an issue that largely has been avoided during the current session of Congress because of the political sensitivities involved.

    The measure also would eliminate the current law that says employment-based visas to any one country can't exceed 7 percent of the total number of such visas given out. Instead, permanent residence visas or green cards would be handled on a first-come, first-served basis.

    “This will significantly shorten the wait for the people in the family queues,â€
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member stevetheroofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    somewhere near Mexico I reckon!
    Posts
    9,681
    389-15 vote! It goes to the Senate now! Please! Look here!
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-254442.html
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member agrneydgrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,760
    Stop ALLLLLLLL immgration for a year at least.

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012
    The reason we have a percentage restriction is so no one country can overwhelm us. With the majority of the illegals here from Mexico coming though the back door and 15% more coming through the front, this bill does not make sense and I don't think that it is in the best interest of the country long term.
    Under a measure approved by the House Tuesday, with a 389-15
    Throw them all out!!
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5
    Senior Member stevetheroofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    somewhere near Mexico I reckon!
    Posts
    9,681
    I read as much as I can here everyday, and I've not heard one word of this vote in the house, It goes to the Senate where you know what will happen with Reid at the wheel, here are the 33 Senate seats up for grabs in 2012 please "Watch out for this bill" Until our borders are secure and the feds get a handle on illegal immigration there should be a "Time Out" on all immigration!

    Democrats/Independents seeking re-election (15 seats)

    Tom Carper Delaware
    http://carper.senate.gov/public/index.c ... tor-carper
    http://twitter.com/senatorcarper
    http://www.facebook.com/tomcarper

    Nelson, Bill (202) 224-5274 Orlando, Florida 32801
    http://billnelson.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm
    http://twitter.com/senbillnelson
    http://www.facebook.com/billnelson?sk=wall

    Nelson, Ben (202) 224-6551 Omaha, NE 68154
    http://www.bennelson.senate.gov/
    http://twitter.com/SenBenNelson
    http://www.facebook.com/senatorbennelson

    Ben Cardin of Maryland
    http://cardin.senate.gov/contact/
    http://twitter.com/SenatorCardin
    http://www.facebook.com/senatorbencardin

    Stabenow, Debbie (202) 224-4822 East Lansing, MI 48823
    http://stabenow.senate.gov/?p=contact
    http://twitter.com/StabenowPress
    http://www.facebook.com/stabenow?sk=wall

    Klobuchar, Amy (202) 224-3244 Rochester, MN 55901
    http://klobuchar.senate.gov/emailamy.cf ... &submit=Go
    http://twitter.com/aklobuchar
    http://www.facebook.com/amyklobuchar

    McCaskill, Claire (202) 224-6154 Columbia, Missouri 65201
    http://mccaskill.senate.gov/?p=contact
    http://twitter.com/mccaskilloffice
    http://www.facebook.com/senatormccaskill

    Tester, Jon (202) 224-2644 Bozeman, MT 59715
    http://tester.senate.gov/Contact/index.cfm
    http://twitter.com/senatortester
    http://www.facebook.com/jtester

    Dianne Feinstein of California
    https://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public ... /e-mail-me
    http://twitter.com/DianneFeinstein
    http://www.facebook.com/DianneFeinstein

    Menendez, Robert (202) 224-4744 Barrington, New Jersey 08007
    http://menendez.senate.gov/contact/
    http://twitter.com/SenatorMenendez
    http://www.facebook.com/senatormenendez

    Kirsten Gillibrand of New York
    http://gillibrand.senate.gov/contact/
    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kristen-G ... 6862263057

    Sherrod Brown of Ohio
    http://brown.senate.gov/contact/
    http://twitter.com/sensherrodbrown
    http://www.facebook.com/sherrod

    Bob Casey, Jr. of Pennsylvania
    http://casey.senate.gov/contact/
    http://twitter.com/SenBobCasey
    http://www.facebook.com/SenatorBobCasey

    Whitehouse, Sheldon (202) 224-2921 Providence, RI 02903
    http://whitehouse.senate.gov/contact/
    http://twitter.com/SenWhitehouse
    http://www.facebook.com/SenatorWhitehouse?sk=wall

    Sanders, Bernard (202) 224-5141 Burlington,VT 05401
    http://sanders.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm
    http://twitter.com/senatorsanders
    http://www.facebook.com/senatorsanders

    Maria Cantwell of Washington
    http://cantwell.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm
    http://twitter.com/Sencantwell
    http://www.facebook.com/senatorcantwell

    Manchin, Joe, III (202) 224-3954 Charleston, WV 25301
    http://manchin.senate.gov/contact_form.cfm
    http://twitter.com/Sen_JoeManchin
    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Joe-Manch ... 5395755161

    Republicans seeking re-election (8 seats)

    Lugar, Richard G. (202) 224-4814 Evansville, Indiana 47708
    http://lugar.senate.gov/contact/contactform.cfm
    http://twitter.com/senatorlugar
    http://www.facebook.com/senatorlugar?sk ... 7385757369

    Snowe, Olympia J.(202) 224-5344 Augusta, Maine 04330
    http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/email
    http://twitter.com/senatorsnowe
    http://www.facebook.com/SenatorSnowe?sk=wall

    Scott Brown of Massachusetts
    http://scottbrown.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contactme
    http://twitter.com/USSenScottBrown
    http://www.facebook.com/senatorscottbrown

    Wicker, Roger F. (202) 224-6253 Jackson, MS 39201
    http://wicker.senate.gov/public/index.c ... atorWicker
    http://twitter.com/SenatorWicker
    http://www.facebook.com/SenatorWicker

    Dean Heller 202-224-6244 Reno, NV 89501
    http://heller.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact-form
    http://twitter.com/SenDeanHeller
    http://www.facebook.com/SenDeanHeller

    Bob Corker of Tennessee
    https://www.corker.senate.gov/public/?p=ContactMe
    http://twitter.com/SenBobCorker
    http://www.facebook.com/bobcorker?ref=ts

    Orrin Hatch (202) 224-5251 Cedar City, UT 84720
    http://hatch.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/email-orrin
    http://twitter.com/SenOrrinHatch
    http://www.facebook.com/OrrinHatch

    John Barrasso 202-224-6441 Casper, WY 82602
    http://barrasso.senate.gov/public/index ... ontactForm
    http://twitter.com/senjohnbarrasso
    http://www.facebook.com/johnbarrasso
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #6
    Senior Member stevetheroofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    somewhere near Mexico I reckon!
    Posts
    9,681
    This is some dirty backhanded crap here! This was all done behind closed doors, and yes this is just another form of "Amnesty"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwHWbsvgQUE
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  7. #7
    Senior Member Oldglory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    837
    Quote Originally Posted by Newmexican
    The reason we have a percentage restriction is so no one country can overwhelm us. With the majority of the illegals here from Mexico coming though the back door and 15% more coming through the front, this bill does not make sense and I don't think that it is in the best interest of the country long term.
    Under a measure approved by the House Tuesday, with a 389-15
    Throw them all out!!
    Exactly, what about diversity? We don't need more immigrants added to our population growth anyway especially since there are no jobs even for Americans and our resources being stretched thin already.

  8. #8
    Senior Member BetsyRoss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,262
    They're rushing it through. The main beneficiaries will be India and China, but Mexico will benefit too.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •