Thread: The Voting System is Rigged—Part Three

The Voting System is Rigged—Part Three

August 26, 2016



The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class are to represent and repress them.—Karl MarxGET OUT TO VOTE!!!! People must get out to vote in mass to prevent fraud, since there is only a small percentage of votes that can change results and become a fraudulent election.-BWC

Democrats insist that fraud during elections is a myth. They claim voter fraud is “virtually non-existent,” buying votes is too difficult and too “legally risky to pull off,” tampering with voting machines is a misnomer because they are often backed up by paper ballots or other means of auditing (except for the 2000 election between George Bush and Al Gore, which Democrats still insist was stolen from Gore).

The facts, however, tell a very different story, especially in 2016. And it’s not just Donald Trump’s “Rigged-election Paranoia,” as Vanity Fair claimed.

Election Fraud and Voter fraud is real.

From Whitewater to Travelgate, Chinagate, Monicagate, Vince Foster, Filegate, Cattle Futures, Bosnia, Benghazi, and the Clinton Foundation, how else could the corrupt Bill and Hillary Clinton be one election away from sleeping in the White House again?

A recent study by Stanford University proved that Hillary Clinton‘s campaign pre-rigged the system to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders. And it was never more apparent than in California where Bernie Sanders voters were likely robbed of a legitimate candidate—and they know how it happened and who is to blame.

Fresh from the jaws of defeat, Bernie Sanders supporters yelled “You cheated!” and drowned out California Secretary of State Alex Padilla during a California delegation meeting at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia in July. The Sacramento Bee has a video of their angry display.

The rigged presidential primary left millions of Sanders voters oppressed and overwhelmed after arriving at polling stations to find they had been dropped from the Democrat Party, reregistered in another party or “No Party Preference,” or purged altogether from the voter rolls.

Oddly, Republican voters in California experienced the same, although for a different reason. Disenfranchised Republican voters provided cover for the real scam—to steal the election from Sanders.

Simultaneously, the DNC email scandal exposed by Wikileaks forced DNC party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to resign when it was revealed that she and other party leaders were assisting presumptive nominee Hillary Clinton with a primary win.

The Democrat Party cheated its own voters. Why would the DNC stop with the Primary when an entire election hangs in the balance?

The Pre-Fix Was In

Ahead of the primary election, a lawsuit was filed by civil rights attorneys, alleging California counties were negligent in educating voters of their rights surrounding California’s “No Party Preference” choice, known in other states as “Decline to State.”

But U.S. District Judge William Alsup, the federal judge who rejected the lawsuit, is a Clinton appointee.

As we wrote in a previous article, poll workers were directed by the California Secretary of State NOT to inform voters of their rights before casting a provisional ballot—an issue the judge also rejected. Judge Alsup “also denied the request that volunteers at polling places be required to tell voters about the unusual rules surrounding which political parties have opened their presidential contests to unaffiliated ‘independent’ voters,” the Los Angeles Times reported. “The citizens of California are smart enough to know what their rights are,” the judge said.

Yet the official Election Officer Training Manual stated: “A No Party Preference voter will need to request a crossover ballot from the Roster Index Officer. (Do not offer them a crossover ballot if they do not ask).”

California was a crucial state for both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, but the election was called for Clinton minutes after the polls closed, before millions of provisional ballot votes were counted. One month later, more than 2.6 million votes were still uncounted in California. We still don’t know if the provisional votes were counted, and the Secretary of State isn’t talking.

“Once reserved for emergency situations, provisional ballots were freely handed out across California on June 7 … they were used by more than one of every five primary voters who showed up at a polling place,” the L.A. Times reported.

Fresh From the Past

Shortly after I published “Electronic Vote Rigging In California: Mainstream Media Silent,” Ron Nehring, former Chairman of the California Republican Party, wrote an op ed for The Flash Report and said “The election is not rigged.” His basis for this statement? “While America’s political system isn’t perfect, it is among the best in the world, and it certainly isn’t ‘rigged.’” So we’re supposed to accept “isn’t perfect, but better than the rest” as good enough?

Nehring’s bio says, “He has served as an international election observer for the International Republican Institute in Kenya, and as an independent observer in Honduras.” Even the New York Times says Kenya’s elections have not been its strong suit. And only three years ago, electoral authorities in Honduras had to recount votes from its presidential election following allegations of fraud. Is this the standard we should expect?

I agree with Nehring that America’s political system is among the best in the world, but it’s certainly not exempt from corruption and fraud.

“Election fraud is occurring and it is benefitting Hillary Clinton‚Äìespecially in states that use unaccountable, electronic voting machines,” Megan Barth wrote in Part ll of our series. Electronic voting machines are susceptible to hacking and manipulation—particularly in Democrat-dominated states.

Documented Election Integrity Problems in California

Mr. Nehring should take all of his election experience and talk with Linda Paine with The Election Integrity Project. In 2013 in just Los Angeles County, The Election Integrity Project documented more than 60,000 anomalies and irregularities on the voter rolls.

In the 2014 California Primary, approximately 1,200 poll workers in Los Angeles “changed their mind about working at the polls,” all at the same time resulting in a poll worker crisis. The positions were magically filled within the day.

Of the June 7 California Primary, Paine said the Election Integrity Project members documented Primary Election Day anomalies, and found disturbing, consistent patterns. “We believe the problem is with Vote Cal,” she said (California’s electronic voting system). “It’s the same problems all over the state.”

“Europe has rejected electronic voting machines because they are untrustworthy,” wrote Roger Stone atThe Hill. “This is not a secret. The media continues a drum beat insisting voter fraud is non existent without ever addressing the more ominous question of manipulation of the voting machines. It keeps those in control in control.”

“In Europe, they use exit polling to determine who won and lost. The tabulated vote only serves as a formal verification. But that is done with paper ballots and hand counts under supervision, the way we used to do it.”

In California, media exit polling vanished this Primary Election, largely because pre-primary polling was showing a probable Bernie Sanders landslide. With electronic vote rigging, the exit polls would be disastrous. Yet the chances of such a great overnight shift are considered to be statistically impossible.
Stone explains how this is done.

(1) Publish a poll contrived to suggest the result you are going to bring about.
(2) Manipulate the machines to bring about precisely your desired outcome.

After Reuters admitted it was oversampling Democrats in polls to obtain the desired outcome, the gig was up.
Nation of Change reported:

“A second Stanford study comparing voting machines to pre-election polls shows extreme discrepancies in many states where electronic voting machines were utilized.

The study compared 337 pre-election polls, representation about 140,000 voters across 34 primary states.

The pre-election polls were successful at predicting Clinton’s numbers in states with paper trails. However, Clinton over-performed an average of 9% in the states that use electronic voting machines but fail to provide paper evidence of this vote.

Simply speaking, Clinton beat expectations ONLY in states with unaccountable voting machines.

What’s more, two of the three companies that control the electronic voting machine market, Dominion Voting and H.I.G. Capital (i.e. hart Intercivic) are on the list of big money donors that donated to the Clinton campaign, as shown by the DNC documents leaked by Guccifer 2.0.”

Take Action!

Donald Trump has rightly called for poll watchers in every state. Many voters want to know what to do to help ensure that all ballots in every election are lawfully cast, by people legally eligible to vote.

The Election Integrity Project recruits and trains citizen volunteers in every state to be poll watchers and observers. These trained volunteers play an active role in protecting our most fundamental right as citizens to have fair and honest elections. Contact Election Integrity Project to sign up. It’s one important step to take to ensure that the Election Day truly reflects the will of the people.

http://bwcentral.org/2016/08/the-vot...ed-part-three/

The Voting System is Rigged – GET OUT TO VOTE! —Part Two:

August 17, 2016



GET OUT TO VOTE!!!! People must get out to vote in mass to prevent fraud, since there is only a small percentage of votes that can change results and become a fraudulent election.-BWCVoting is the most precious right of every citizen, and we have a moral obligation to ensure the integrity of our voting process. —Hillary Clinton

Morality and integrity are not two adjectives used by informed, objective voters to describe Hillary Clinton, and her hypocrisy is hard to measure. But what can be measured is the amount of fraud and deceptive practices the Democratic National Committee used, as uncovered by Wikileaks, to rig the 2016 primary election. In part one of this series, Katy Grimes exposed how the California primary was rigged to disenfranchise many Democrat, Independent and Republican voters in order to secure a win for Hillary Clinton. The Arizona secretary of State, Michele Reagan, confirmed that voter fraud occurred during the AZ primary, potentially impacting millions of voters. In Brooklyn NY, 126,000 voters were purged from the voter rolls, and election corruption has become a well-documented standard in Illinois.

Which begs the question: If the DNC was willing and able to rig a primary election, what would prevent them from doing the same in a national election—-especially in the battleground states of Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin?

Destroying (or hiding) the paper trail

A study done on the Democratic primary is pointing to signs of election fraud in multiple states. Two statisticians studied exit polls and other data and compared them to actual election results. Axel Geijsel of Tilburg University in The Netherlands and Rodolfo Cortes Barragan from Stanford University in California published the study on June 7, 2016. Their conclusion? Election fraud is occurring and it is benefitting Hillary Clinton—especially in states that use unaccountable, electronic voting machines.

Further evidence in possible tampering with electronic voting machines comes from Clark County, NV. According to NewsMax TV in Nevada:July 28, 2016—
District Court Judge Michelle Levitt dismissed requests, filed by three June Republican Primary candidates, to review the original paper ballots cast in their assembly districts, this despite expert testimony that there were numerous errors and unexplained anomalies in the vote count. Republican candidates Diana Orrock (AD9), Blaine Jones (AD21), and Mary Rooney (AD41) presented their case in a day-long hearing. The paper ballots are those printed out for the voter to inspect before casting his or her vote.

Six Republican candidates from the June 2016 primary election had filed “Statements of Contest” in Clark County District Court based on NRS 293.410(f), which allows for an election contest on grounds that there was a “possible” malfunction in the voting or counting devices used to record and tabulate the votes.

Attorney for the candidates, Joel F. Hansen, argued, based on the sworn expert testimony presented at the hearing, that it was not only possible but very probable that there were malfunctions, either unintentional or deliberate, somewhere in the vote counting, and that the Judge should allow these candidates access to the election materials, including paper ballots, which are being kept secret by the Registrar of voters. Hansen argued that the contestants only wanted to find out the truth by actually inspecting the paper ballots, rather than just believing the word of the Registrar, who had refused their computer security expert Robert Frank access to the ballots, despite the Registrar’s claims that such access was freely granted.

The initial discrepancies were discovered by independent research into County Statements of Vote by Nevada’s Citizens Task Force for Voter Rights (CTFVR). Detailed analysis revealed that the Clark County “Statement of Vote” and the associated abstracts were misleading because it was found that the vote abstract numbers for those Republican Assembly Races did not correspond to those races. Instead of reflecting just the Republican votes, the abstract reflected all votes cast, Democrat and Republican. Reporting the numbers this way concealed how many votes were counted which were cast by phantom voters. These “over-votes” are impossible if the voting machines are functioning properly. Also, the official results showed huge percentage swings between the votes cast during early voting and the votes cast on Election Day. Statistics show that these swings should not and cannot happen without some type of malfunction in the system, either unintended or deliberate.

“It was clear that the Clark County Election Department, the District Attorney, and the Judge did not want the voters to have the opportunity to compare the actual paper ballots with the computer tallied results, which computers have been proven before to be fraught with erroneous and incorrect voter tally information,” said USAF Retired Colonel Bob Frank, Chair and Co-founder of CTFVR. “With so many national reports of similar election machine failures and increasing hacking into government computers, candidates are obligated to all Nevada voters to protect the integrity of our election system. Trustworthy elections are one of the foundations of our Republic. It is our duty to help ensure there is end-to-end elections integrity.”

Who maintains and controls the voting machines in Nevada? One of the largest donors to the Democrat Party, the SEIU. In the words of Josef Stalin, “It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.”

The return of the vast Right-Wing ConspiracyAccording to a Pew Research Center survey, only 31 percent of Americans were confident that “the votes across the country were accurately counted” in the 2012 election. A separate Pew survey in 2012 found that one out of eight voter registrations is inaccurate, out-of-date, or a duplicate. Some 2.8 million people are registered in two or more states, and 1.8 million registered voters are dead.The Heritage Foundation has published a detailed list of approximately 200 cases of voter fraud from across the country.

As reported by the Daily Signal: “In Philadelphia, the setting of the infamous 2008 New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case, four local election officials have been charged with casting multiple votes in the city’s 18th Ward in a precinct in which three of them didn’t even live and were not registered to vote. This case illustrates the importance of poll watchers, because it was a local poll watcher who saw what happened and brought it to the attention of the district attorney’s office. This is the same district attorney, Democrat Seth Williams, who indicted two Democratic state legislators last year for accepting bribes in exchange for voting against a voter ID bill after the Pennsylvania attorney general, Kathleen Kane, also a Democrat, refused to prosecute the case.”
Kathleen Kane was elected Attorney General in 2012 and was considered a rising star in the Democrat Party….until a grand jury indictment and felony conviction forced her resignation.

Hillary Clinton has just called for illegals, aka “dreamers,” to “get out the vote.” Her partner in crime, Terry McAulliffe, will defy a courts order by granting clemency allowing convicted felons to vote in the swing state of Virginia.

Electronic voting machines are susceptible to hacking and manipulation (READ: How to hack an election in 7 minutes). Citizen journalists like James O’Keefe has a video series on voter and election fraud in various states. Just last week he posed as Eminem to receive a ballot in Michigan. In Washington DC, a white male reporter of O’Keefe’s was given Eric Holder’s ballot.

The left-wing DNC sycophants in the media cannot have it both ways. They cannot proclaim that Hillary Clinton won the Democrat nomination because of election rigging and fraud, and in the next breath claim that Donald Trump is “dangerous” to warn voters about election rigging and fraud. To dismiss Donald Trump’s warnings as dangerous and conspiratorial is not only laughable, but is gravely dangerous to the integrity of the election process. But then again, what would the Democrats know about integrity? They just rigged one election, why not one more?

http://bwcentral.org/2016/08/the-vot...gged-part-two/

The Voting System IS Rigged – GET OUT TO VOTE!

August 10, 2016



People must get out to vote in mass to prevent fraud, since there is only a small percentage of votes that can change results and become a fraudulent election.-BWC“It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.”—Joseph Stalin

With all of the election fraud reported in California on Primary Election Day June 7th, it is particularly interesting that former President Bill Clinton met with California Governor Jerry Brown behind closed doors in California the week before the Primary. “They discussed foreign and domestic politics, and yes, the presidential campaign,” said Brown’s spokesman Evan Westrup, the Los Angeles Times reported.

I’ll just bet they discussed foreign and domestic politics… just the way Attorney General Loretta Lynch said she and Bill Clinton talked only of grandchildren, golf, and their respective travels, in a private jet on a tarmac in Arizona.

The electronic vote rigging in California appears to have been designed to keep Bernie supporters from electing him in the primary. And if they can steal an election in California, they can steal the Presidential Election.

Election fraud was widespread during the California Primary election June 7. Thousands upon thousands of California voters showed up at their designated polling stations only to discover that their party registration had been changed, or they were dropped entirely from the rolls. And it was evident this was done from within the state’s electronic voting system.

Many predict there will be massive election fraud during the general election, all to benefit Democrat Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. (This is my SHOCKED face)Harken back to the 2012 Presidential election. There were reports of voting machines automatically defaulting to a vote for Barack Obama… Reports of 120% voter turnout in far too many precincts… Bus loads of strangers showing up at polling stations… And there were precincts showing 100 percent of the vote for one candidate – Obama.

“One group from Princeton needed only seven minutes and simple hacking tools to install a computer program on a voting machine that took votes for one candidate and gave them to another,” The Hill reported in November 2014. “More whimsically, two researchers showed they could install Pac-Man onto a touch-screen voting machine, leaving no detectable traces of their presence.”

Source: Canada Free Press
ALERT: People must get out to vote in mass to prevent fraud, since there is only a small percentage of votes that can change results and become a fraudulent election.

http://bwcentral.org/2016/08/the-vot...tem-is-rigged/

WE HAVE TO WIN HUUUUUGE!!!!!! HUUUUUGE!!!! BY A MILE TO BEAT THIS "FIX".

They've rigged the news, they've rigged the polls, they're rigging the machines, to rig this election. Trump's got this figured out. He knows it already. And really, you'd have to be brain-dead not to see the first two. So it's totally and completely logical to believe they've done that to set it up for the third to win the fourth.

But, we'll stop 'em. We'll beat them anyway. We have to get every single Trump Supporter and Trump Leaner to the polls.