Thread: Is your presidential candidate the right choice for you?

Your Results: Email Your Results

1. Theoretical Ideal Candidate (100%)
2. Tom Tancredo (95%) Information link
3. Duncan Hunter (82%) Information link
4. Ron Paul (57%) Information link
5. John Edwards (54%) Information link
6. Bill Richardson (53%) Information link
7. Chuck Hagel (not announced) (49%) Information link
8. Mitt Romney (48%) Information link
9. Mike Huckabee (47%) Information link
10. Christopher Dodd (47%) Information link
11. Jim Gilmore (withdrawn) (47%) Information link
12. Al Gore (not announced) (46%) Information link
13. Hillary Clinton (45%) Information link
14. Sam Brownback (45%) Information link
15. Barack Obama (45%) Information link
16. Mike Gravel (44%) Information link
17. Wesley Clark (not announced) (42%) Information link
18. Dennis Kucinich (42%) Information link
19. Joseph Biden (42%) Information link
20. Tommy Thompson (42%) Information link
21. Fred Thompson (not announced) (39%) Information link
22. Alan Augustson (campaign suspended) (38%) Information link
23. Kent McManigal (campaign suspended) (38%) Information link
24. John McCain (38%) Information link
25. Michael Bloomberg (not announced) (31%) Information link
26. Newt Gingrich (not announced) (30%) Information link
27. Rudolph Giuliani (23%) Information link
28. Elaine Brown (22%) Information link

1. Theoretical Ideal Candidate (100%)
2. Tom Tancredo (84%) Information link
3. Duncan Hunter (76%) Information link
4. Mitt Romney (72%) Information link
5. Ron Paul (70%) Information link
6. Chuck Hagel (not announced) (66%) Information link
7. Sam Brownback (64%) Information link
8. Jim Gilmore (withdrawn) (61%) Information link
9. John McCain (61%) Information link
10. Fred Thompson (not announced) (60%) Information link
11. Newt Gingrich (not announced) (56%) Information link

Mine came out with Tancredo at the top, and Hunter in third. Wish we could see both these guys on a ticket together.

Paul was further down for me.

For the life of me, I can't understand why Hunter and these other second tier candidates can't get the media coverage -- I suppose they're just being marginalized on purpose. I'm all for any of them ...just get these other losers out of the picture first.

1. Theoretical Ideal Candidate (100%)
2. Tom Tancredo (70%) Information link
3. Duncan Hunter (69%) Information link
4. Mitt Romney (59%) Information link
5. John McCain (56%) Information link
6. Chuck Hagel (not announced) (56%) Information link
7. Ron Paul (52%) Information link
8. Rudolph Giuliani (52%) Information link
9. Jim Gilmore (withdrawn) (51%) Information link
10. John Edwards (51%) Information link
11. Sam Brownback (51%) Information link
12. Newt Gingrich (not announced) (47%) Information link
13. Hillary Clinton (46%) Information link
14. Fred Thompson (not announced) (46%) Information link
15. Kent McManigal (campaign suspended) (44%) Information link
16. Joseph Biden (43%) Information link
17. Al Gore (not announced) (42%) Information link
18. Bill Richardson (40%) Information link
19. Mike Gravel (39%) Information link
20. Tommy Thompson (38%) Information link
21. Wesley Clark (not announced) (38%) Information link
22. Mike Huckabee (36%) Information link
23. Christopher Dodd (36%) Information link
24. Barack Obama (34%) Information link
25. Dennis Kucinich (32%) Information link
26. Alan Augustson (campaign suspended) (31%) Information link
27. Michael Bloomberg (not announced) (28%) Information link
28. Elaine Brown (19%) Information link

Tancredo was first and he is who I am voting for. Hunter was second who would be my second choice. I don't understand why McCain is so high. Other than wanting a strong military I agree with him on pretty much nothing.

Theoretical Ideal Candidate (100%)
2. John McCain (67%) Information link
3. Tom Tancredo (64%) Information link
4. Duncan Hunter (61%) Information link
5. Mitt Romney (57%) Information link
6. Rudolph Giuliani (56%) Information link
7. Fred Thompson (not announced) (53%) Information link
8. Sam Brownback (50%) Information link
9. Jim Gilmore (withdrawn) (48%) Information link
10. Chuck Hagel (not announced) (45%) Information link
11. Ron Paul (45%) Information link
12. Newt Gingrich (not announced) (44%) Information link
13. Tommy Thompson (41%) Information link
14. John Edwards (38%) Information link
15. Mike Huckabee (37%) Information link
16. Al Gore (not announced) (36%) Information link
17. Hillary Clinton (36%) Information link
18. Michael Bloomberg (not announced) (36%) Information link
19. Joseph Biden (33%) Information link
20. Bill Richardson (32%) Information link
21. Kent McManigal (campaign suspended) (32%) Information link
22. Dennis Kucinich (31%) Information link
23. Christopher Dodd (27%) Information link
24. Wesley Clark (not announced) (27%) Information link
25. Barack Obama (26%) Information link
26. Mike Gravel (23%) Information link
27. Alan Augustson (campaign suspended) (23%) Information link
28. Elaine Brown (16%) Information link

McCain? No way. It had to be the age and war stances that pushed him up. I found several of the questions unanswerable and certainly concur with the list of ones that were not included.

I got Kunich (spelling?), and then Obama. I'm surprised that I agree with Obama most of the time, EXCEPT on immigration!

I'm very liberal otherwise - want stem cell research to expand, want gay marriage, no death penalty, gun control, pro-choice, etc.

Immigration is the big issue, and if I vote for JUST that, I'd get nothing else. I still might do it.

Originally Posted by cousinsal

I got Kunich (spelling?), and then Obama. I'm surprised that I agree with Obama most of the time, EXCEPT on immigration!

I'm very liberal otherwise - want stem cell research to expand, want gay marriage, no death penalty, gun control, pro-choice, etc.

Immigration is the big issue, and if I vote for JUST that, I'd get nothing else. I still might do it.

In my opinion, it is really the only issue that matters. If this invasion is allowed to continue and we Americans lose all our rights to the invaders, we don't have a country anymore. Do any other issues matter?

I am a Tom Tancredo supporter. I wrote him in in 2004. However, I do not agree with him on everything. I am for stem cell research, he is not. There are other things I don't agree with him on. My point is that if we have no country left, does any of that really matter?

If this invasion is allowed to continue, we lose our country and we Americans probably won't have freedom of speech anymore to debate any issues.

If this invasion is allowed to continue, we lose our country and we Americans probably won't have freedom of speech anymore to debate any issues.

Yep. Stunts like the one in Hazelton with the nutso judge, the stolen vote perpetrated last week by our facist Democratic House of Reps will be de rigeur. That will be our country. We will have no voice -- it will be all about voting in whatever benefits Hispanics, al la Raza.

Heck, I doubt it will even be about voting for anything anymore .. ..it will be all about violence and mob rule, just as it is in Mexico.

Sad to say, many Americans just don't realize it. They are in love with the idea of Hitlary as our first woman president, or Obama as the first black. I say who cares what sex, race, religion you are -- just be for AMERICANS first -- and the rest will follow. But people are just so snowed . . . I hope to God it is changing ...I hope. I do think many are waking up to the fact that our government does not represent us. That is common across both parties. Hopefully it bodes well for change.

If this invasion is allowed to continue, we lose our country and we Americans probably won't have freedom of speech anymore to debate any issues.[/quote]

You're right - it does make me sick to think of voting for Obama or Hilary.

I have given my support to Tancredo, too. I just gave him a monthly donation - small, but if we all did it.......

cousinsal wrote:

I'm very liberal otherwise - want stem cell research to expand, want gay marriage, no death penalty, gun control, pro-choice, etc.

You and I are certainly worlds apart in our ideology, but I'm with you on this - all the other issues are secondary when compared to illegal immigration and border security. However, I say that knowing the other things that are important to me have to be figured into the equation in some small way.