Thread: Asylum Rules Would Allow Migrating Foreign Populations to Fill Half of Midwest

Originally Posted by Judy

LOL!! Well, maam or sir, or whatever you are

She's dressing you down now.

Originally Posted by jtdc

He just proved all the talk was only that, "TALK"!

What "TALK" are you talking about?

Originally Posted by Judy

You claim you're a life-long Republican, why are you asking me? Why don't you already know the answer to your own questions about your own party?

It's you who doesn't seem to get it. The fact that there was a Republican majority did not stop the Democrats and Republicans from pushing together for amnesty and no wall. President Trump should have called their bluff. But instead he put his signature on that piece of crap bill, meaning it has his endorsement. If he was against it, he should have Vetoed it and let them override his veto!

Originally Posted by jtdc

Plagiarism? I already made that accusation!

LOL!! There's nothing wrong with being a Democrat or an Independent or something else. It's just odd for people who claim they're Republicans to hate President Trump when if they're Republican they're the same people who voted for Ronald Reagan, 2 Bushes, John McCain and Mitt Romney, but ... they hate Donald Trump. It's wacko!!

Originally Posted by Judy

A political party has one purpose and that is to elect candidates for public office and re-elect them when they've done a good job and elect more legislators from the same party to get more votes to allow the legislatures the ability to pass the laws people of the party claim they want

That may be what you want and what the party leaders want, but I don't think that is what the Founders had in mind when they set up "representatives". Those people were not to represent political parties, they were to represent their constituency, regardless of political views. We have lost that today! You seem to endorse what England has where the party in power designates who the leader of the country will be.

Originally Posted by Judy

so I don't understand why members of the same party would differ so wildly on their party's President of the United States. It's mind-boggling actually.

THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENCY, NOT POLITICAL PARTIES. HAVING POLITICIANS WITH ALLEGIANCE TO THEIR PARTIES LEADS TO BLOCK VOTING RATHER THAN REPRESENTATIVES VOTING INDIVIDUALLY FOR WHAT THEIR CONSTITUENCY WANTS THEM TO VOTE FOR.

Originally Posted by Judy

And then for those mind-bogglers to call someone who supports the candidate who won the election and who is doing a good job a "cult" member or a "blind cheerleader" is crazy!!

No, it seems to be accurate!

Originally Posted by jtdc

It's you who doesn't seem to get it. The fact that there was a Republican majority did not stop the Democrats and Republicans from pushing together for amnesty and no wall. President Trump should have called their bluff. But instead he put his signature on that piece of crap bill, meaning it has his endorsement. If he was against it, he should have Vetoed it and let them override his veto!

There was no amnesty in the spending bill. What are you talking about??!! The purpose of government is to run, not shut down. I did not want a government shut down, if you did, then you were disappointed, I didn't, so I'm happy camper. I've never wanted or supported these stupid government shut downs, because they're .... STUPID.

Two asylum rules pushed by Rep. David Price (D-NC) as well as Rep. Kevin Yoder (R-KS) and approved by the GOP-majority House Appropriations Committee would allow foreign nationals seeking refuge in the U.S. to migrate based on claims that they are fleeing domestic abuse or gang violence.

How do you prove you are a victim of domestic abuse or gang violence?? You can't.

There should be no asylum granted at all. It's turned into a giant scam.

Originally Posted by Judy

What "TALK" are you talking about?

Don't you remember anything? Candidate Trump promised that on day one he would end DACA and OBAMACARE!

Originally Posted by Judy

LOL!! There's nothing wrong with being a Democrat or an Independent or something else. It's just odd for people who claim they're Republicans to hate President Trump when if they're Republican they're the same people who voted for Ronald Reagan, 2 Bushes, John McCain and Mitt Romney, but ... they hate Donald Trump. It's wacko!!

It is one thing to be critical of some decisions the President makes, but when the criticism is consistently against him with never an acknowledgement of the accomplishments, I see RINO!

Originally Posted by jtdc

That may be what you want and what the party leaders want, but I don't think that is what the Founders had in mind when they set up "representatives". Those people were not to represent political parties, they were to represent their constituency, regardless of political views. We have lost that today! You seem to endorse what England has where the party in power designates who the leader of the country will be.

THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENCY, NOT POLITICAL PARTIES. HAVING POLITICIANS WITH ALLEGIANCE TO THEIR PARTIES LEADS TO BLOCK VOTING RATHER THAN REPRESENTATIVES VOTING INDIVIDUALLY FOR WHAT THEIR CONSTITUENCY WANTS THEM TO VOTE FOR.

No, it seems to be accurate!

Then don't worry about Yoder, he's just doing his job for his district like you claim he should.

VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2018!!!