Quote Originally Posted by Judy View Post
Either you didn't read the ruling or you missed the fact that Plyler vs Doe only applies to state funded elementary schools not being allowed to charge illegal aliens tuition.

Wow, MW, how you get from a case that only applies to state school districts charging illegal aliens tuition to attend elementary schools to the federal government being unable to enforce US immigration law is a leap so giant and wrong you'd think a liberal Democrat wrote those posts.

And yes, any federal authority or state authority enforcing federal law can go into schools or anywhere for that matter and round them up, load them up on buses or in vans and haul them to a detention center for deportation hearings and removal.
Geez, I'm tired of going in circles with you. Either I'm not making myself clear or you're just having a difficult time comprehending what I'm saying. Maybe you're not even reading what I'm saying. Regardless of the reason behind your failure to understand what I'm saying, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Plyler v. Doe (1982) is very clear in its meaning.

All children, regardless of immigration status, are entitled to a free public education, as required under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

It is the law. Whether you or I agree with it, which I don't, is irrelevant. Being entitled means federal law enforcement can't go in and yank the illegal children from their classrooms just for being illegal. I don't know how to be anymore clearer than that. If you have a problem with it, I suggest you petition your congress critter to file an amendment to change the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (good luck with that). It is the U.S. Supreme Courts job to interrupt the law and in my opinion this wouldn't be the first time they got it wrong, however, we're stuck with it unless, under a new challenge, they admit their error and reverse their original ruling (not likely).