Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By Jean
  • 1 Post By GeorgiaPeach
  • 1 Post By Goldendaze

Thread: Coulter Hates ‘the Browning of America’

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006

    Coulter Hates ‘the Browning of America’

    05.26.155:15 AM ET
    Lloyd Grove

    The motormouth claims the U.S. is being ruined by an influx of immigrants from Latin America, Asia, and Africa. Is this performance art or is she for real?

    When it comes to Ann Coulter—the conservative blonde avenger, the loud-mouthed provocateur, the human hot-button of mass-media notoriety who is forever tossing turds into liberals’ punch bowls—people always want to know: Is she for real?

    Even the title of her latest book, ¡Adios, America!: The Left’s Plan to Turn Our Country Into a Third World Hellhole, is guaranteed to raise many folks’ blood pressure and strain their credulity.

    Does Coulter actually believe the tendentious claim in that title or other incendiary things she has said in the past—for example, that the 9/11 widows are greedy, fame-obsessed “witches” and “harpies”; that the United States should invade Muslim countries, “kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity”; that her Christian co-religionists are “perfected Jews”; that she only wishes that Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh had targeted The New York Times instead?

    Or is she merely engaging in perverse, albeit attention-getting, performance art?

    Apparently the answer is: a bit of both.

    “I don’t know why liberals find this idea about me comfortable,” Coulter tells me over dinner, “but I just had lunch with a law school friend of mine, and I had forgotten—and he reminded me—that at law school I wore mink coats and took up smoking just to annoy liberals, so apparently I’d been like this for awhile. He said, ‘You’re exactly like you were in law school.’

    “But I have summer-camp friends—who, when they see people say ‘this is just an act, she doesn’t really believe it’—they would write indignant letters and say, ‘No. She would march up to me on the hiking trail and explain that Nixon was being lied about.’ ”

    We are sitting near the kitchen in a quiet Italian restaurant, a favorite haunt in the Upper East Side neighborhood in which she keeps an apartment; her other two homes are in Beverly Hills, Calif., and a wealthy enclave of Florida (unnamed here, at Coulter’s request, so as not to encourage stalkers), where she established official residence years ago in order to avoid state income taxes.

    She has done very well for herself; she gets seven-figure book advances, and while her lecture fees are not in the Hillary Clinton range, Coulter has little cause for complaint.

    She has arrived for dinner with the panache of a prom queen, making a grand entrance, graciously accepting the elaborate greeting of the maître d’ and stopping by a front table to trade kisses with talk radio host Mark Simone and Fox Business Network personality Charlie Gasparino on the way to her interview with The Daily Beast.

    She is, as usual, dressed against type—that is, if one thinks her type is “matronly Republican Women’s Club activist from New Canaan,” Coulter’s gilded, suburban Connecticut hometown.

    Instead, she wears tight, seemingly painted-on jeans, a hint of midriff showing beneath her blouse; at 53, she still rocks that “Vixen of the Right” thing that once prompted Playboy to ask her to take it all off. In a rare display of caution, she declined.

    “I’m fanatical,” Coulter confides—describing not her ideology but her work habits. “I have no life. No friends. No family. No vacations. Nobody has seen me.”

    She’s kidding, of course—Coulter has plenty of friends (including those, like Bill Maher, who find some of her political views objectionable; I’ve written about and occasionally socialized with her for years.) “I did take a break to watch Forensic Files,” she adds, mentioning the true crime television series for which she admits an obsession.

    Coulter has been a virtual shut-in, staring at her laptop, writing and Googling, Googling and writing, since the height of Florida’s hurricane season. The occasion for her reemergence in Manhattan—and her ramped-up appearances on Sean Hannity’s Fox News Channel program—is the publication of her 11th book (the previous 10 have made the New York Times best-seller list), an often-inflammatory, usually clever, sometimes laugh-out-loud funny screed against immigration, illegal and otherwise.

    Coulter’s near-life-size portrait gazes unsmilingly from the book jacket of ¡Adios America!—looking very much like a hard-eyed, flaxen-haired border guard getting ready to send an unfortunate family of refugees back to wherever they came from.

    “In order to change this country to one more favorable to crazy liberal policies, Democrats passed—and Republicans were hoodwinked into passing—this crazy 1965 immigration law that has changed the country in shocking and dramatic ways,” Coulter says, explaining her book’s premise and referring to legislation—sponsored by the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy—that abolished long-implemented preferences for immigrants from northern and western Europe over Africans, Asians and other third-world natives.

    “This has been our law for 50 years now, and I blame the Republicans for idiotically continuing it,” she continues. “The Simpson-Mazzoli Act of 1986 [creating an easier path to citizenship for foreigners who illegally entered and settled in the United States] was a mistake. As for these idiot Tea Partiers or whichever conservatives are idol-worshipping Ronald Reagan, he was great for his time, but it was a different world. I don’t think he’s going down as the greatest president when he signed an amnesty law.”

    Coulter—whose own ancestors arrived here from the Netherlands, England, Ireland and Germany starting in the 17th century, she says—argues that teeming hordes of new immigrants, especially from Mexico, vote overwhelmingly Democratic, so current immigration policy is really “an evil-genius plan to change the country. That’s what the Democrats get out of it. Obama never could have been elected in this country but for Teddy Kennedy’s immigration act. Never, never, ever, ever!”

    Coulter’s politically quixotic prescription: a 10-year moratorium on all legal immigration; a complete dismantling of the immigration bureaucracy, not only government agencies and sympathetic elected officials but also outside advocacy groups; the erection of an impassable fence along the entire U.S.-Mexican border (in her book, she praises the Communist East Germans for effectively, sometimes lethally, preventing their citizens from breaching the Berlin Wall); and a return to pre-1965 policies that give preference to highly-educated, usually white Europeans.

    “I wouldn’t care if they were white or not; I’m talking about peasants who come from backward cultures,” she says, although she expresses alarm at predictions that by 2050 Caucasians in this country will be a minority. “There are white people from backward cultures. They just don’t happen to come from a country contiguous to the United States. It’s backward cultures that are providing cheap labor and Democratic votes.” (Coulter, however, is unfailingly friendly to our waiter, who identifies himself as “Luis,” an immigrant from Ecuador who came here 10 years ago and is working his way toward U.S. Citizenship.)

    Coulter argues that U.S. immigration policies were demonstrably better a hundred years ago. “There was no mollycoddling of immigrants back then. With the Irish and the Italians, and even the Germans—especially the Germans—we were allowed to boss them around,” she says. “We could say, ‘No. No. You can’t do this anymore. You are an American now. Knock it off!’ The only problem with the fact that they [recent immigrants] are brown—well, you’re saying they’re brown, I’m saying they’re peasants—is that they’re piggy-backing on the black experience, and saying ‘that’s racist’ if you tell them to do things our way, and ‘you can just assimilate to us,’ not the other way around.

    "Can you imagine the Irish or Italians or Germans saying that to our country back at the turn of the century? ‘No! **** you! You came to our country. Learn our ways!’ ”

    Using language that many doubtless will find hair-raising if not downright offensive, Coulter speaks of the “browning of America”—a term she says she adopted as a negative after seeing it bandied favorably on MSNBC—and how the country is being ruined by an influx from Latin America, the Indian subcontinent, Vietnam, Nigeria, and other benighted locales.

    “In Nigeria, everyone is a criminal,” Coulter claims. “But we take more immigrants from Nigeria than we do from Britain. Don’t react casually to that! That’s madness. The British are just going to other countries. And a lot of these countries, like Spain, are just shitholes now. Young, smart people are emigrating to Germany and they won’t be collecting Social Security immediately. Perhaps we should consider them rather than a Nigerian terrorist.”

    Coulter adds that among the victims of Latino immigration, especially, are African-Americans. “Hispanic groups will move into neighborhoods and say, ‘we don’t want any blacks here,’ and start physically attacking blacks,” she says. “It’s kind of wild. In most race relations, it’s never blacks who are victims of terror, it’s whites. Now blacks are being terrorized.”

    So Ann Coulter is the voice of African-Americans now?

    “I know they’re never going to adopt me, so you don’t have to say it in that sarcastic way,” she parries. “If they still hate me, I don’t care. They’re being totally screwed by this whole diversity and integration imperative, and they really are part of America. They are so important culturally in America—I mean the humor, the actors...they have the comedians and the music. I love Dave Chapelle, and my close personal friend Sherrod Small. I love Eddie Murphy, although he doesn’t do anything anymore. And Chris Rock.”

    In ¡Adios, America! and over dinner, Coulter expands on her belief that when new arrivals from foreign climes are not busying themselves with “browning” the country, collecting welfare payments and swarming to the polls to vote Democrats into office, they are committing Medicare fraud, child rape, gang rape, honor killings and a host of other un-American activities.

    She blames politically correct U.S. government census-taking and crime statistic policies—and the media establishment’s reluctance to identify the countries of origin of the alleged perpetrators--on the fact that she doesn’t have generally accepted stats to back up her assertions, merely horrific anecdotes and back-of-the-envelope guesses.

    In her assertions about the allegedly low average intelligence of various “undesirable” immigrant groups, she relies on the studies of Jason Richwine, whose work on IQ and immigration was too controversial even for the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation, which dismissed him from his staff job there after his Harvard doctoral dissertation came to light.

    Meanwhile, Coulter blasts the current crop of Republican presidential hopefuls—with the exception of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker—as “bozos” and “morons,” and heaps special contempt on Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul (whom she accuses of favoring amnesty) and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who lately pays lip-service to tough policies, Coulter says, “but I don’t trust him.”

    Coulter’s beau ideal is a two-time presidential candidate who insists he isn’t running this time around: 2012 Republican standard-bearer Mitt Romney.

    He is the only politician whose immigration policies—including his much-derided notion from the 2012 campaign that illegal residents should be incentivized to “self-deport”—are closely aligned with Coulter’s, and she hopes that GOP primary voters will ultimately beg him to get into the 2016 race.

    Calling herself a “one-issue” voter, Coulter excuses Romney’s flip-flopping on abortion rights (from pro-choice to pro-life) because “he flipped on it our way” and when he was pro-choice, it was 1994 and “he was trying to take out Teddy Kennedy” in the Massachusetts Senate race.

    “Look,” Coulter tells me, “if he had to be Adolf Hitler but managed to take out Teddy, I would salute him to end that menace.”
    Newmexican likes this.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  2. #2
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Ann Coulter should run for President! Seriously!

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    She said the truth about the damage from former Senator Ted Kennedy's immigration meddling in 1965 and how Mexico is effectively the winner and Americans and the United States have been and continue to be the losers. We keep allowing poverty, illiteracy, crime with non-stop illegal immigration. We keep allowing billions in dollars to leave in the form of remittances to corrupt nations.

    We will be the terrible places these individuals leave as their populations increase within our own nation.

    We know the numbers are closer to 30 million plus illegal aliens. You cannot keep saying 10-12 million for a decade or more.
    Last edited by GeorgiaPeach; 05-27-2015 at 10:00 PM.
    kevinssdad likes this.
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member Goldendaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    I just love Coulter and most everything she says. I agree that Ted Kennedy's immigration policy contributed to the demise of this country and its traditional pre-1965 culture. I agree that once large numbers of Latinos invade an area, they do indeed push whites and blacks (and anything not Spanish speaking South/Central) out of their homes and jobs. Make no mistake. If you don't speak Spanish and you're not brown, they HATE you. They even hate brown people that do not speak Spanish. My statement does not derive from an isolated point of view. I experience it daily in my personal life. Ann is 100% right that the Latinos are piggy backing off the blacks. The Latinos have a full deck of race cards they are not shy to deal out.

    Coulter claims that the 1965 immigration alterations were established in order to give the Democratic party a leg up in elections. Did she forget that a democrat was overwhelmingly elected to the presidency in 1960? This land slide victory had nothing to do with immigration and everything to do with segregation. In 1954 Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Overturning the 1896 ruling "separate but equal", Warren declared that segregation in schools was a violation of the 14th amendment. Warren's actions eventually resulted in "forced" integration in 1957 Little Rock Arkansas. Please note that during Eisenhower's 1st term, he essentially laid low on issues of de-segregation. IKE was re-elected in 1956.

    From the view point of many American people, IKE was held responsible for turning this country into a police state where the armed military was called out to enforce laws that the public did not agree to! So in 1960 the voters turned to a Southern Democrat. A young Senator whose voting record was consistently in line with segregationists. In fact, Hubert Humphrey's platform in favor of civil rights for black America cost him the nomination. Despite the best efforts by voters to keep the status quo, JFK was shot, LBJ took office and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, coupled with Affirmative action, laid the ground work for Ted Kennedy's immigration policy, the death of the Southern Democratic party and the rise of a new liberal Democratic party. Americans had one last chance with Goldwater. Ironically though, LBJs campaign propaganda claimed that Goldwater would start WWIII. Of course after LBJ won against Goldwater, he sent over 1/2 million troops to Vietnam. I would like to comment that Goldwater was not a racist. He believed in integration through peaceful social change.
    LBJ's forceful tactics resulted in driving a wedge between the races causing more animosity than ever before. LBJ is ultimately responsible for today's overly sensitive political correctness and the mentality of all non-white males sense of "you owe me".

    In conclusion, Ted Kennedy's immigration is not the largest contributor to what is "wrong" with America today. Warren started the ball rolling and LBJ ultimately knocked down all the pins. And let us not forget, the original responsibility for Obama being elected lies with Lincoln. If it wasn't for Lincoln, Obama would not be president, "never, never, ever, ever".
    csarbww likes this.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Quote Originally Posted by ALIPAC View Post
    Ann Coulter should run for President! Seriously!

    I would vote for her in a heart beat.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    I don't know if Ann is a voice for African Americans but I know she was a "mouthpiece" for one African American.

    (I'm really jealous, Ann!)

Similar Threads

  1. Ann Coulter: I've Never Seen Evidence GOP Hates Black People Until I Read Rubio's 'Am
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-09-2014, 12:20 AM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-20-2012, 10:55 AM
  3. How We Know Obama Hates America
    By OneNationUnderGod in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-21-2011, 09:45 PM
  4. IL:the browning of America has occurred
    By MadInChicago in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-27-2008, 03:58 PM
  5. Why the world hates America
    By ruthiela in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-29-2006, 08:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts