Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Coulrophobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    96

    Dems to use lame duck session to push DREAM Act

    Democrats are considering cramming as many as 20 pieces of legislation into the lame-duck session they plan to hold after the Nov. 2 election.

    The array of bills competing for floor time shows the sense of urgency among Democratic lawmakers to act before the start of the 112th Congress, when Republicans are expected to control more seats in the Senate and House.

    But, given the slow pace of the Senate, it also all but guarantees that Democrats will be hard-pressed to pass even a small part of their lame-duck agenda.

    The highest-profile item for November and December is the tax cuts of 2001 and 2003, passed under President George W. Bush, which expire at year’s end.

    Democrats have promised they will not allow tax rates to rise for families making less than $250,000 a year.

    Democratic leaders have also prioritized the defense authorization bill, which includes a repeal of the “Don’t ask, don’t tellâ€

  2. #2
    Senior Member PaulRevere9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,032

    D C

    I Wish Washington DC would shut down for a month after the Nov elections. The more the Dems do the more damage occurs to the U S.

  3. #3
    Senior Member lccat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,584
    Not very many comments if any on the source article addressing the DREAM AMNESTY ACT.

  4. #4
    Senior Member ReggieMay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,527
    Cowards! They don't want to vote on the Dream Act before the election because they know it's unpopular among the voters.
    "A Nation of sheep will beget a government of Wolves" -Edward R. Murrow

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member florgal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,386
    I saw Brian Bilbray on America's Newsroom this morning and he said Mexico had been promised 'something' before the end of the year, not just for illegals already here, but for those who want to come.
    The progressives have nothing to lose. We are on to them now and they know it. NOTHING they do will surprise me.

  6. #6
    Senior Member lccat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,584
    "Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) says he intends to hold Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to a promise to schedule a vote on legislation that would bar the Environmental Protection Agency from taking action to curb carbon gas emissions for two years. "

    Rockefeller may be willing to trade his vote on the DREAM AMNESTY ACT for some support for his delay in the "curb of carbon gas emissions".

  7. #7
    Senior Member USPatriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    SW Florida
    Posts
    3,827
    I think it is important to get a commitment from each Senator BEFORE the election on how they will vote on the Dream Act in the lame duck session if brought to the floor for a vote.
    "A Government big enough to give you everything you want,is strong enough to take everything you have"* Thomas Jefferson

  8. #8
    Senior Member lccat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,584
    ILLEGALS’ invading our Nation is not a partisan issue; there are Politicians in both major Political Parties who are against Amnesty, for Enforcement, and Securing our Borders. However, during the last few years I have learned that many Politicians that you vote for under a set of parameters much as CHILDREN always test the limits of how far they go and to see what they can get away with in office. They have a lot of pressure from Special Interest Groups and Elitist Political Contributors and we have to continue to remind the Politicians that we will remove them from office if they want to serve the Special Interest Groups and not the Citizens. If the Elitist Politicians refuse their Citizens and only serve their Special Interest Groups our Nation will be lost so we must continue to REMIND!

    HOWEVER A LAME-DUCK CONGRESSMAN ONLY HAS HIS ELITIST POLITICAL CONTRIBUTORS TO ANSWER. What recourse do United States Citizens have when the LAME-DUCKS only serve their ELITIST SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS?????

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •